User talk:Mewtow

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mewtow!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語にほんご | ちゅうぶん | ちゅうぶん台灣たいわん)‎ | ちゅうぶん(简体)‎ | ちゅうぶんしげるからだ)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arrondis.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear Mewtow,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Fonctionnement d'une file - 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   18:15, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Processus de reconnaissance.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   14:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Post-normalisation.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   20:21, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pre-normalisation.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   19:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai l'intention d'utiliser ce fichier sur Vikidia, mais j'ai corrigé le texte concernant l'émetteur : le fil étant commun aux circuits base - émetteur et collecteur - émetteur, je trouve logique d'indiquer que c'est les 2 courants qui passent par l'émetteur. Si toutefois, tu avais une raison de préférer tes légendes, tu peux annuler cette modif en me le signalant et je mettrai cette version modifiée sous un autre nom. Bech (talk) 21:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A priori, ce petit changement ne m'arrange pas trop et je préférerais que tu mettes la nouvelle version dans un autre fichier. Le truc, c'est que j'utilise ce schéma dans mon cours d'architectures des ordinateurs, dans des sections où je n'ai pas besoin de détailler précisément le fonctionnement exact d'un BJT. J'ai juste besoin de dire que le BJT est un amplificateur, pas plus. Et je me contente de dire qu'il prend un courant en entrée sur la base, sort un courant amplifié (ce qui n'est pas faux : le courant sur l'émetteur est égal à , ce qui correspond bien à un courant amplifié) et que le courant sur le collecteur sert d'alimentation. Dire ce qui se passe dans le transistor en disant qu'il y a deux courants Ic et Ib, qu'on trouve leur somme sur l'émetteur, comment s'effectue l'amplification et autre, ça passe à la trappe. Le but est vraiment de faire au plus simple. Si je n'avais pas ce contexte un peu particulier, j'aurais laissé ta version, qui aurait clairement sa place pour illustrer un cours d'électronique. Mais le problème est que je n'écrit pas un cours d'électronique proprement dit.
Je vais donc malheureusement remettre l'ancienne version du schéma, je te laisse mettre la version modifiée sous un autre nom. Merci d'avoir prévenu, en tout cas, tu as bien fait.
Cordialement. Mewtow (talk) 22:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lorsque je me contente de corriger la luminosité ou les couleurs d'une photo publiée sur wikimedia, je ne juge pas utile de le signaler. Mais là, un changement de légende pouvait avoir de l'importance. Donc, je t'ai prévenu. Du coup, la version modifiée que je mets dans un autre fichier s'écarte de ta légende pour le collecteur pour parler encore mieux des courants qui passent dans les 3 fils (lorsque le transistor est utilisé en émetteur commun). Il se trouve aussi que des images de wikimedia peuvent être sur d'autres wikis (parmi lesquels vikidia) sans être répertoriés dans la liste Utilisations du fichier sur d’autres wikis. Je ne sais pas si c'est le cas pour tes fichiers ou s'ils se limitent à une utilisation sur wikibooks.org. Bech (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]