User talk:NaBUru38
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Rocket000 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:2009 Uruguayan primary elections - José Mujica lists.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:2009 Uruguayan primary elections - José Mujica lists.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Polarlys (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:2009 Uruguayan primary elections - Danilo Astori lists.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:2009 Uruguayan primary elections - Danilo Astori lists.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Polarlys (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Autódromo Víctor Borrat Fabini de El Pinar - 2011 Mercosur Superbikes Cup - Entrance.jpg was uncategorized on 19 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi NaBUru38, I saw no valid reason for undoing my last edit by you (here). Please note that Wikimedia Commons is a multilingual and international project. Compromise, reasonableness, and explanation are needed here, so take the time, explain why you did what you did. Thanks. AMERICOPHILE 03:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello NaBUru38
[edit]I just wanted to tell you how much I enjoy your photos of cars in Uruguay. I also have a request: If you happen to see a Ford Corcel II like the one pictured on the right, WP could use a rear view of one. Thanks again, I am going to try to edit the lighting of some of your shots from Montevideo and see if they can be improved. Cheers, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 18:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
|
File:Pintada de la fundación del Club Atlético Peñarol - Montevideo 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MauriManya (talk) 02:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
qqq messages
[edit]Hi! It looks like you've mistakenly translated a few of the documentation messages ("qqq") for the Illustrating Wikipedia brochure. Those messages are not intended to be translated; they provide a description of the corresponding English message to make it easier for translators to translate the actual content. Thanks for the Spanish translations you've been doing!--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 15:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. It looks like you're doing a great job with the translations.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 15:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/NaBUru38⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски,
日本語 , русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français,
日本語 , Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear NaBUru38,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Beer Consumption by Country.svg
[edit]
Done--Carnby (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
SCCA car categorizing
[edit]Would you please look through the images that I took in Category:2013 SCCA National Championship Runoffs? I don't understand enough to add the cars into the different classes under Category:Classes of sports car racing. I attended the runoffs at Road America from 2009 to 2013 so there's more to check there if you choose to accept my request. I have 18 more to upload to the 2012 category which I hope to work on soon. Thank you! Royalbroil 03:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Royal! I've categorized some photos of the 2013 SCCA Runoffs. God luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you! Royalbroil 22:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Categoría:Geología de España
[edit]Hola NaBUru38, estás categorizando la "Categoría:Geología de España" en "Geografía de España", sin embargo la geología NO es en absoluto una parte de la geografía, son disciplinas completamente distintas. Comparten algún aspecto en lo relativo al relieve, pero poco más, la geología abarca muchísimos aspectos totalmente ajenos a la geografía. La geología, junto a la flora y fauna, forma parte de la naturaleza de un país, pero no existe la categoría "Naturaleza de España". En geografía entran los accidentes geográficos y las divisiones administrativas, no la geología. Un saludo, --PePeEfe (talk) 10:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Perdona, sí existía la categoría "Naturaleza de España", pero también estaba bajo la categoría de "Geografía de España". He pasado la geología de España a la naturaleza de España y he he sacado ésta de geografía, pues, evidentemente, la naturaleza no es una parte de la geografía (en todo caso será la geografía física parte de la naturaleza). Un saludo, --PePeEfe (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- ¡Hola, PePeEfe! Si me pusiera a buscar imágenes del relieve terrestre, sería razonable encontrarlas en la categoría "Naturaleza".
- En todo caso, me confunde que haya categorías "Geografía", "Naturaleza" y "Ambiente", me cueesta entender qué fotos van dónde. Saludos, NaBUru38 (talk) 01:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sí es un poco lioso, mucha gente confunde esos conceptos. Lo de ambiente no tengo ni idea qué quiere decir, podría ser más o menos sinónimo de paisaje, que también existe; aquí creo que se mezcla el consevacionismo. Una rama de la geografía, la geografía física, que incluye la geomorfología, se estudia, con diferentes matices, desde ambas disciplinas, geografía y geología, pero es la única zona gris. Otra parte de la geografía, la geografía política, sin embargo, no forma parte en absoluto de la naturaleza o del medio natural, forma parte de las disciplinas sociales o humanidades, por lo que conceptualmente no pueden subordinarse una a otra o sinonimizarse.
- En cualquier caso la geografía incluye todas aquellas formas singulares descriptivas del relieve y las que tradicionalmente se han considerado parte de la geografía: mares, ríos, lagos, montes, penínsulas, desiertos, formaciones rocosas, paisajes, cuevas, etc. Mientras que geología incluye todo lo relacionado con origen, composición, y estructuras de las rocas (como litologías y formaciones geológicas, no como formas singulares del relieve), mapas geológicos, fósiles, minerales, estructuras geológicas y tectónica (pliegues, fallas, volcanes, estructuras sedimentarias, etc.), afloramientos, yacimientos, minería, procesos que dan lugar a los relieves, y un largo etc. (Puedes ver por ejemplo una diferencia entre w:es:Formación rocosa y w:es:Formación geológica). La geografía, además, no estudia los procesos geológicos como el metamorfismo o el magmatismo, que se producen en el interior de la tierra debidos a procesos geológicos internos, por lo que las rocas plutónicas y metamórficas, le son ajenas, solo las estudia desde el punto de vista geomorfológico cuando se meteorizan en superficie. Lo mismo con los procesos orogénicos de formación del relieve o cualquier fenómeno de origen interno o histórico (tectónica de placas, plumas del manto, estructura interna de la Tierra, sísmica, diagénesis, paleomagnetismo, extinción de los dinosaurios, etc.).
- Alguna foto o subcategoría podrá, por tanto, estar en ambas categorías. Los volcanes, por ejemplo, se han estudiado, como forma del relieve por la geografía, pero el vulcanismo, como tal, lo estudia la geología. Por ejemplo, en las tipologías de volcanes influye la composición de los magmas, más viscosos o fluidos según el contenido en gases, sílice, minerales máficos, etc., que no estudia la geografía, pero la geología sí estudia, además de las causas, modos, o el vulcanismo del pasado remoto, que no tiene porqué dejar formas especiales en el relieve (una formación volcánica interestratificada en una secuencia sedimentaria se escapa completamente a la geografía, pero sigue siendo evidencia de un volcán, aunque sea del pasado).
- Algo que confunde mucho son los Atlas geográficos, que suelen empezar hablando del medio físico, desde el origen del universo, la formación del sistema solar, la Tierra, la geología, e, introduciendo cada capítulo geográfico, de la etnografía, demografía y economía de cada región, pareciendo, por tanto, que todos estos aspectos forman parte de la geografía, cuando realmente son tomados prestados de las disciplinas que los estudian.
- Perdona la extensión, y quizá mi falta de claridad o precisión en las explicaciones, pero son aspectos que la mayor parte de la gente confunde. Espero haberte aclarado algo. Cualquier precisión o ampliación que necesites me lo dices. Un saludo, --PePeEfe (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear NaBUru38,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear NaBUru38,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
|
People associated with association football has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Mercosur
[edit]Hello. Sorry, I thought that it was a racing series and these was just one of the races. I will revert it right now. regards.--Montesita (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
CfD: College athletics programs
[edit]Hi, I have started a discussion to rename a large collection of categories, one or more of which you may have created or edited. Please see the discussion thread at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/College athletics programs for details. Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 04:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Hi NaBUru38. I noticed that you've made malformed deletion requests. When you want to delete a file with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Bob Wollek Zolder 1976 crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
RX-Guru (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Missvain (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
