User talk:PereslavlFoto

Сообщения о QI:

2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, — 2017

Сообщения о VI

Никитский монастырь

Здравствуйте. Для статьи Никитский мужской монастырь не могу найти хорошей фотографии с общим видом. Нет ли у Вас такой в архиве? Например такой: http://temples.ru/show_picture.php?PictureID=7184 А если нет, то можно ли такую сделать? А то фото в статье 363×263 пикселов. --Lodo27 (talk) 20:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Вот такая халтура есть, а другого нет. Однако вполне может быть, что появится, почему бы нет? Я запомнил задачу.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Graves in Moscow

Получается двойная категоризация. С одной стороны, Category:Cemeteries in Moscow, в которой уже под тысячу фото, уже есть внучка Category:Graves in Russia (спорно - но соответствует глобальной схеме). С другой стороны, фотографии могил c московских кладбищ (всех или выборочно?) вы кодируете на Category:Graves in Moscow. Но, если Cemeteries = подмножество Graves, то Category:Cemeteries in Moscow должна включаться в Category:Graves in Moscow - NVO (talk) 13:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Вы совершенно правы. Моя логика гораздо проще: вижу переполненную муторную категорию "в России", делю её на "в местах России". Я согласен с вами, что могилы не должны дублировать кладбища. Когда вы станете реформировать это дерево, прошу вас помнить про тонкость: могилы != кладбища. Есть могилы вне кладбищ, например, братские могилы-памятники или могилы священников при церквях. Затем, кладбища != могилы, потому что есть единичные могилы в масштабах города или села, когда не хватает материала для категории "кладбище". А какова же глобальная схема-то? Мне надо присобачить Category:Graves in Pereslavl. Это будут могилы ВНЕ кладбищ.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Глобальная схема такая:

Category:Death

Category:Burials (обряды и места)

Category:Graves (места захоронений)

Category:Burial grounds (места захоронений с более чем одним похороненным - всё, кроме одиночных могил)

Category:Cemeteries (организованные кладбища в отличие, скажем, от семейных (закрытых публике) захоронений)

Category:Grave markers (могильные знаки любого вида - надгробия, кресты, курганы, бакены в море...)

Category:Gravestones, Category:Grave sculptures ... - по видам надгробий

Т.е. graves - именно место захоронения в самом широком смысле, а не осязаемое надгробие. Поэтому graves включает в себя кладбища, а не наоборот. Такая (спорная) подчинённость появилась 2 года назад (см. историю Category:Burial grounds). Чего-то пытались обсуждать, но устаканилось именно так. NVO (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Чудесно. Ясно, что кладбища входят в могилы. Теперь расскажите, как это сочетается с географией? Вот у меня есть могила в Переславле и есть могила на кладбище в Переславле. Как их раскладывать?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Если таких фото немного, полагаю что Category:Graves in Pereslavl вполне достаточно (сделайте ее подкатегорией Category:Pereslavl-Zalessky и Category:Cemeteries in Yaroslavl Oblast - неидеально, но полное дерево незачем развертывать). NVO (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

В ближайшие пятьдесят лет таких фотографий будет очень много. Поэтому нужно полное дерево. Однако я воспринимаю Переславль как часть России, а не часть области, так как область пока не особо представлена могилками. Тем более я не буду делать graves подкатегорией для cemeteries, потому что эти могилки сами по себе, не кладбищенские.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Originl photo was overexposed and colors were splashed. I did lower ligthness and change color tonality to more natural ones. If You want You can click on Yours first upload and change it back to 1st version by clicking REVERT on left side of your photo. But i dont find original version any good. --Mile (talk) 08:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peresecenie2011-expo-2076.jpg

Hi ! First of all, not everything can be a QI, because it might be very difficult to have the main subject of the picture without disturbing elements. It is especially true in museums, which are full of interesting elements ;) In the case of this picture, I think a tighter crop would have done the trick (wouldn't thus be a 2/3 ratio, but really sometimes I think it is better to sacrifice this "golden rule" for better compo), but wouldn't have solved the "cut blue thing" on top. So in this case, my only advise would be "look carefully at the border of your pictures". Maybe try also some different points of view, like taking pictures while sitting / being on your kneels. Good luck :) Léna (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос 2

Но жаль только я не знаю все наименования предметов изображенных на фото. Alexxx1979 (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Собираетесь ещё побывать в музее? Фотографировали ярлыки на витрине?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Вряд ли получится, если и побываю то не в ближайшее время. К сожалению ярлыки не фотографировал. Не подскажите есть ли в вики статья или описание как правильно получать разрешение на публикацию работ от авторов, и в каком виде должно быть это разрешение? Alexxx1979 (talk) 18:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Никакого "правильного" получения нет. Это обычный договор между правообладателем и фотографом, фотограф просит передать ему неисключительное право использовать производную фотографию, а автор исходного произведения соглашается или не соглашается. Если автор продвинутый, он пишет разрешение по электронной почте в службу OTRS. Если автор не особо продвинутый, надо приехать к нему и написать на бумаге. Есть шаблон, который можно взять за основу, например, так:

To: permissions-commonswikimedia.org

Настоящим я заявляю, что являюсь автором и/или единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на произведение такое-то (названия или список или описание).

Я разрешаю использование (воспроизведение, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю) изображений этого произведения (или этих произведений) на условиях свободной лицензии такой-то (здесь вставить лицензию) в том числе и для случаев, когда оно является основным объектом этого воспроизведения, сообщения в эфир или по кабелю либо когда изображение произведения используется в коммерческих целях.

Я понимаю, что тем самым даю право любому лицу распространять, изменять и использовать изображение произведения в любых законных целях (в том числе связанных с извлечением коммерческой выгоды) при условии соблюдения указанных лицензий.

Я уведомлён, что я сохраняю исключительные авторские права на это произведение вне условий указанных лицензий и что я всегда сохраняю право на упоминание меня как автора в соответствии с выбранными лицензиями. Модификации, которые сделают другие люди, не будут приписаны мне.

Данное разрешение затрагивает только мои исключительные авторские права, и я оставляю за собой право предпринимать действия против использования моей работы с нарушением закона — в частности, для клеветы, унижения чести и достоинства, нарушения правил использования торговых марок, нарушения права на охрану изображения гражданина и т. д.

Я понимаю, что я не могу отозвать данное разрешение и что изображения произведений могут размещаться в проектах Фонда Викимедиа в течение неограниченного времени либо быть удалённой оттуда.

ДАТА, ИМЯ АВТОРА

--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. Alexxx1979 (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:H-chka-52-5038.jpg

I want to discuss your critics. Maybe I understand it wrong, so you may give me some advice. "Unbalanced composition" means the house takes half an image, and another half is about empty? "Avoidable lamp", how can it be avoided? Next trouble, is there anything remarkable in a small town with 50 000 inhabitants? What can I search for, what notabile items may I find out? Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Hi! It's like there is too much stuff on one side under a diagonal. A more balanced image with such a pronounced perspective could have had for example some trees on the right, or a nice clouds+moon area on the sky on the right. That's what I meant. But sometimes balancing is very subjective, it seems very unbalanced for my taste, but maybe somebody else considers it to be fine, don't worry. Second, avoidable lamp means it is very disturbing, very near, covering an important part of the details of building. By moving some steps to a side, it could have been avoided by taking the picture form another angle. About the third thing, I usually don't take important pictures in my city, even if I live in a huge Metropolis (Caracas), because it is very dangerous to go out with the camera (they may steal it from you). I take pictures on nearby mountains, lakes, do trips and go away from town. Otherwise look for macrophotography, nature, animals, churches ect etc. Just be creative and think a little bit. Wonderful stuff is always around the corner. Hope it helps, regards my friend. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh, by the way, by lamp I meant the lamp post, which is also inclined, disturbing the verticality of the lines of the buildings. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Many thanks!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 05:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pz-elections-2011-gok-4399.jpg

Hello, please have a look at the straight vertical lines on both sides of the image. In full resolution, when moving the image towards the (vertical) margin of the screen, you will see that those lines are inclined towards the right (at left) and to the left (at right)... and it's easy to correct with the help of an image processer (Gimp, Photoshop, or the like). The image is otherwise very good, and I'll promote it once this will be done. Best regards, --Cayambe (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gm-belltower-4018.jpg

Hi! Strong noise reduction has washed out many details. Especially trees are looking very unnatural. Regards, --Ivar (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok, if old lenses caused the problem, then imo it will be difficult to fix it. --Ivar (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Уважаемый участник, обращаю Ваше внимание, что данный проект не предназначен для пропаганды теорий заговора и предупреждаю Вас, что при дальнейшем педалировании заведомо ложных утверждений [1] и продолжении нарушений COM:AGF [2] [3] Ваш доступ к редактированию может быть технически ограничен. Спасибо за понимание. Sealle (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Цензуру хотите делать? Делайте, я же не могу вас удержать. Неужели вы сами не видите, что в названиях категорий есть очевидный bias в сторону англо-французских языков? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Загранпаспорт у Вас есть? А во времена СССР был? «Засилье англо-французских языков» на первой странице - тоже заговор? P. S. Ещё одна такая реплика, как выше - и будет блокировка. Sealle (talk) 10:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Во времена СССР у меня не было загранпаспорта, и сейчас нет. Вы собираетесь блокировать меня за то, что вы делаете на моей странице обсуждения. Просто здорово, чего уж там. Это такая месть?
  - Аргумент про первую страницу не годится, потому что в обсуждении мы говорили про категории. Первая страница тут вообще ни при чём, потому что на первой странице всё по-русски. А вы во времена СССР, наверное, работали в партийной цензуре и всё запрещали? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Не смог предположить, что фразу о первой странице паспорта можно не понять. Речь была о том, что в международном документообороте традиционно используются широко распространённые языки. Так принято и здесь. Sealle (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - Спасибо, теперь я понимаю, при чём тут загранпаспорт. Но тут-то дело совсем иное. Сначала для категорий было принято правило, по которому разрешены все языки. Потом на деле (против правила) были запрещены все языки, кроме английского. Потом явочно были разрешены французский и немецкий. Потом вы блокируете меня за то, что я смею не соглашаться с вами.
      - Я понял, что причина блокировки -- месть за мои слова. Поэтому у меня и возник вопрос о том, куда обращаться, чтобы проверить ваши действия. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: intimidation/harassment: + vandalism:insertion of deliberately false information.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語にほんご ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（简体）‎ ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（繁しげる體からだ）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sealle (talk) 11:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Как здесь возражают на такие действия? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

События

Вы выбрали крайне необычный способ категоризации событий в Переславле - по дням (Events in Pereslavl on June 21), но при этом почему-то не используете куда более распространенный и логичный критерий - Events by year с подкатегориями - который бы попадал хотя бы в материнскую категорию Events in Russia by year. Я делал нечто подобное для Москвы (Category:Events in Moscow by year), может есть смысл взять за образец, иначе ваши категории просто напросто теряются где-то среди Переславских категорий.ю --Stolbovsky (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Мне не нужно знать, в каком году они произошли. Напротив, мне нужно знать, что произошло в этот день в разные годы. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- что ж, тогда я сам проставлю годы. На текущий момент все эти фото зарыты в категориях Переславля, что не правильно. Stolbovsky (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Если вы ДОБАВИТЕ к ним категории по годам, это будет очень хорошо. Благодарю вас. Однако знайте, что категории по дням и месяцам отдельно необходимы, чтобы знать, что происходило в этот день в разные годы. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Смотрите, Events in Pereslavl day by day это вечный календарь! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ну безусловно, я не буду мешать мандарины с кошками. Дни отдельно, года отдельно.Stolbovsky (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語にほんご ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

You are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. If your behaviour is not moderated, you may be blocked from further editing.

Sealle (talk) 08:45, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый участник, впредь, пытаясь вступать в обсуждения, в которые Вас никто не приглашал, попытайтесь сначала понять, какой именно вопрос в них обсуждается. К сожалению для Вашей теории заговора, никто и не заявлял, что РИА Новости нарушает чьё-либо авторское право. Дальнейшие же инсинуации на тему зловредных администраторов незамедлительно приведут Вашу учётную запись к новой блокировке со сроком, соответствующим журналу предыдущих. Sealle (talk) 08:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Насколько я понимаю, там обсуждается вопрос о том, есть ли у РИАН права на их фотографии, или среди снимков РИАН есть нарушения авторских прав. Зная, что среди снимков, сделанных сотрудниками РИАН, нет ни одного нарушения авторских прав, я и пишу об этом. Никакой теории заговора у меня нет. А вот ваша борьба со мной просто удивляет. Будьте добры, расскажите, что именно в моих действиях вас задевает? Вам не нравится число сделанных мною качественных изображений? Вам не нравится моя работа на Викиновости? В чём проблема, которая заставляет вас угрожать мне? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Нет, Вы понимаете совершенно неправильно. Речь шла исключительно о том, что некоторые участники пытаются загружать изображения, правообладателем которых является РИА Новости, под подложными лицензиями, пытаясь выдать их за предоставленные в рамках проекта COM:RIA Novosti. Остальные Ваши домыслы в комментариях не нуждаются. Sealle (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Вот оно что! Ясно, спасибо. Однако меня по-прежнему удивляет, что вы ополчились против меня. Что же вынудило вас угрожать мне ограничениями, когда можно обойтись пояснениями? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P-stepanenko-sa-6642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK for me but on the image is a person, not a forum. So, could you try to add some person-related category, more Stepanenko-related or something out of the People of... type of categories? --Basotxerri 17:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Done. --PereslavlFoto 17:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilya-ilf-pasternak-1.jpg

Hi PereslavlFoto, today I learned that apparently the above photo does not depict Pasternak, but Аркадий Шайхет. Please check this article to see for yourself. A person from Pasternak house in Peredelkino started removing the image from de.wp so it came to my attention (see de:Benutzer Diskussion:Galka1961, in German). Could you help removing the image from the multiple Wikipedia versions? Thanks a lot! --Elya (talk) 21:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Please ping me for an answer, my Commons watchlist is a mess. --Elya (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ips-nscf-2018-laureates-2367.jpg

File:Ips-nscf-2018-laureates-2367.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語にほんご ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（简体） ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（繁しげる體からだ） ∙ +/−

188.103.21.101 18:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2016-9709.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語にほんご ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（简体） ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（繁しげる體からだ） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2016-9709.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2016-9709.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

188.103.21.101 18:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2018-6226.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語にほんご ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（简体） ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（繁しげる體からだ） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2018-6226.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2018-6226.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

188.103.21.101 18:32, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Davy-lamp-0462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For File:Департамент-транспорта-москвы-письмо-2019-10-28.jpg. Very well done. GRuban (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilya-ilf-pasternak-1.jpg

File:Ilya-ilf-pasternak-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語にほんご ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（简体） ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（繁しげる體からだ） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Australia and the UK" section in the Commons:Publication article

Hello PereslavlFoto,

I have been examining the Publication article and would like to ask a couple of questions about what you meant when you wrote this on 29 August 2012 (which remains in the current article):

Australia and the UK (as the U.S.) do not have this exception and generally require the distribution of copies necessary for publication. In the case of sculptures, the copies must be even three-dimensional.^[1]^[2]

These are my questions:

What were you referring to when you wrote "this exception"?
What did you mean by "In the case of sculptures, the copies must be even three-dimensional"? (You have cited section 29 of the Copyright Act 1968 but section 29 does not cover that topic. Therefore, I have not been able to find the source in order to clarify this sentence.)

If you wish, you are welcome to tell me informally and I will be happy to express it in more formal language once I understand your intention.

References

↑ Australian Copyright Act, section 29: Publication.Template:Failed verification URL last accessed 2012-08-29.
↑ Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. 48), section 175, Copyright law of the United Kingdom. URL last accessed 2012-08-29.

— Best wishes, SCHolar44 (talk) 12:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- I did not change Australia section, only added Russia section. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mea culpa -- you had added, commendably, headings for other countries, not content. Sorry! — SCHolar44 (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khasan Battles 1938.jpg

File:Khasan Battles 1938.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語にほんご ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（简体） ∙ 中ちゅう文ぶん（繁しげる體からだ） ∙ +/−

Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос (просьба о помощи)

Доброго времени суток. Вы как-то отписывались в созданной мной теме о загрузке разрешенных фото[4]. Я начал потихоньку грузить в викимедию фотографии которые автор разрешил использовать. Как мне сделать так чтобы их не удалили? как сделать так чтобы они были помечены как фотографии на которые было получено разрешение? Буду вам признателен за совет :) Кертог (talk) 22:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Вы отправили авторское разрешение в службу VRT? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

автор отправлял, и ему номер тиккета сообщили. Вы это имеете ввиду?--Кертог (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

У вас два пути. С одной стороны, вы можете сделать общий лицензионный шаблон для таких фотографий, вот пример. С другой стороны, вы можете сообщать в VRT о каждой фотографии, загруженной под таким-то тикетом, чтобы агенты VRT добавили тикет к описанию фотоснимка. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 01:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо большое. Попытаюсь что-нибудь сделать:)--Кертог (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Хочу уточнить

Правильно ли я понимаю, что на музейные снимки, опубликованные через Госкаталог, распространяются авторские права? В таком случае кому они должны принадлежать - автору снимка или музею? Lishleb (talk) 20:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за вопрос. Авторские права (70 глава Гражданского кодекса РФ) распространяются на все фотографии. Вообще на все-все. Некоторые авторские права (1270 статья) со временем исчезают, а некоторые остаются навсегда. Получая фотографию, музей — как правило — не получал никаких авторских прав на неё, поэтому не может и давать разрешения по таким фотографиям. Следовательно, права принадлежат фотографу и его наследникам. Однако здесь я рассказываю вам только общий случай, а в конкретных случаях могут быть самые разные отличия.
Как же вам поступать? 1) Выяснить, когда был опубликован снимок, и сделать отюда вывод про срок охраны. Авторские права начинаются после публикации снимка. 2) Выяснить, кто его автор. 3) Выяснить, кому автор передал авторские права. 4) Из этого сделать вывод, кто может заключить лицензионный договор. 5) Найти владельца авторских прав и заключить лицензионный договор. 6) Опубликовать этот договор. 7) Опираясь на опубликованный договор, загружать сюда фотографии.
Вы, конечно, спросите меня, как же действуют музеи, архивы, институты при этих строгих условиях. У них есть четыре льготы.
1) Закон о музейном фонде делает особую льготу только для Госкаталога. 2) Институты на своих сайтах нарушают закон. 3) Институты на своих сайтах никому ничего не лицензируют, поэтому не вызывают к себе претензий. 4) Передавая снимок третьим лицам, они в договоре указывают, что не передают никакие права и что весь риск судебного преследования ложится на вторую сторону договора. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on user talkpage of another user

You asked me a question on user talkpage of another user here. Let me answer you here, because the answer does not touch others.

You asked: "What was the source for the knowledge about the goals?"

Actually you know that yourself. You said: "published goals were totally different". That means: you know published goals of ru.ruwiki.ru. Still you say: "As soon as noone knows about the goals, we cannot discuss this." Although you know published goals of ru.ruwiki.ru, you still do not believe them. Even more, you do not say "I do not know the goals", but "Noone knows the goals". That means, in your opinion almost nobody believes published goals of ru.ruwiki.ru. Why do you not believe published goals of ru.ruwiki.ru? Answer that to yourself, I do not want to know your answer. But why ru.ruwiki.ru claims goals, which almost nobody believes? Why ru.ruwiki.ru lies about his goals? This is possible, when real goals are either illegal or shameful. But knowing situation in Russia, goals of ru.ruwiki.ru cannot be illegal. This leads us to last question: which shameful goals ru.ruwiki.ru has? There are very few options. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe in the published goals, I like the published goals and I want them to be achieved. My option about their goals is like that: the goal is to transfer all the contents of governmental mass media, and governmental universities, and governmental archives and museums, and other governmental structures under the free license, so to make that contents available for any business usage. If the government does not want to work with Wikimedia Commons, there must be another free-licensed site for that. Some local branch of Wikimedia Commons that works for the free content.
As soon as I do not know about other goals, I cannot say there are ones. My words about «noone knows the goals» meant that noone here knows any other goals but published ones, so we cannot discuss this theme. I am sorry to confuse you with my poor speech, for I am not fluent in English language.
Looks like our positions are clear now. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

План по переводу сайтов

Добрый вечер! На прошлой неделе была инаугурация Владимира Путина и сегодня он завершил первый день своего госвизита в Китай. У меня есть вопросы по поводу того, какие российские госсайты следует перевести на свободные лицензии? Минюст уже перешёл на свободную лицензию после моего письма, в то время как МИД России постарается учесть мои претензии, а Минтранс, Минздрав, Минцифры и МВД написали мне отказы. Сейчас в очереди у меня Минприроды и несколько российских регионов - Вологодская область, Чечня и Удмуртия, а также сегодня Псковская область перешла на свободную лицензию (письмо было зарегистрировано 14 мая и отправлено на минувших выходных).

Также у меня в планах работа с организациями и странами СНГ - здесь поле деятельности обширнее российских госорганов. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[au-1] Australian Copyright Act, section 29: Publication.Template:Failed verification URL last accessed 2012-08-29.

[2] Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. 48), section 175, Copyright law of the United Kingdom. URL last accessed 2012-08-29.

[1]

[2]

User talk:PereslavlFoto

Contents

Никитский монастырь

Category:Graves in Moscow

File:Peresecenie2011-expo-2076.jpg

Вопрос 2

File:H-chka-52-5038.jpg

File:Pz-elections-2011-gok-4399.jpg

File:Gm-belltower-4018.jpg

Warning

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week

События

Please be civil

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ilya-ilf-pasternak-1.jpg

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

File:Ips-nscf-2018-laureates-2367.jpg

File tagging File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2016-9709.jpg

File tagging File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2018-6226.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

A barnstar for you!

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

File:Ilya-ilf-pasternak-1.jpg

"Australia and the UK" section in the Commons:Publication article

File:Khasan Battles 1938.jpg

Вопрос (просьба о помощи)

Хочу уточнить

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Your question on user talkpage of another user

План по переводу сайтов

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Navigation menu

User talk:PereslavlFoto

Никитский монастырь

Вопрос 2

Warning

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week

События

Please be civil

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ilya-ilf-pasternak-1.jpg

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

File tagging File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2016-9709.jpg

File tagging File:Spbpu-supercomputer-2018-6226.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

A barnstar for you!

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

"Australia and the UK" section in the Commons:Publication article

Вопрос (просьба о помощи)

Хочу уточнить

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Your question on user talkpage of another user

План по переводу сайтов

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Navigation menu

Search