User talk:Rangasyd
|
File tagging File:Hobart BK117 1 27022006.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hobart BK117 1 27022006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hobart BK117 1 27022006.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bidgee (talk) 01:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hobart BK117 1b 27022006.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hobart BK117 1b 27022006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hobart BK117 1b 27022006.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bidgee (talk) 01:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hobart BK117 2 27022006.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hobart BK117 2 27022006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hobart BK117 2 27022006.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bidgee (talk) 01:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:VH-HRSResized.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:VH-HRSResized.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Bidgee (talk) 01:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bathurst rail bridge over Macquarie River.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bathurst rail bridge over Macquarie River.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bathurst rail bridge over Macquarie River.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bidgee (talk) 01:58, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Not all bank branches are "bank buildings"
[edit]I'd be careful using the term "building", when it comes to banks that are just branches. Category:Commonwealth Bank branch, Wagga Wagga is just that (reason why I created another category, as you lumped them into single category linked below), a branch (the building itself was never built for the Commonwealth Bank, it was originally built for a real estate agent), while Category:Commonwealth Bank building, Wagga Wagga was built for the Commonwealth Bank. Bidgee (talk) 01:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I hear you; and thanks for your local knowledge. It's interesting that the Commonwealth Bank branch, Wagga Wagga is a sub-category of Bank buildings in Wagga Wagga, Commonwealth Bank of Australia buildings in New South Wales, and Buildings in Wagga Wagga (suburb). And the same categories apply for Commonwealth Bank building, Wagga Wagga. My efforts in recent days were focused on the four major banks nationally to create consistent sub-categories across each state/territory. Keep up the great work in the Riverina. BTW, are you interested in helping with the NSW State Heritage Register rollout. Your local knowledge south of West Wyalong and west of Yass, would be appreciated Rangasyd (talk) 12:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]Take care in not to over categorise, subcats Category:Greenway Wing (Supreme Court of New South Wales) and Category:Old Registry Wing (Supreme Court of New South Wales) had the very same categories as the parent Category:Supreme Court of New South Wales. I have removed them for now but thinking the whole structure will need to change but at least addressed one issue.
That being, Category:Supreme Court of New South Wales having the "Courthouses in Sydney", "Buildings in the Sydney Central Business District", "Supreme courts by country", and "Buildings in the Sydney Central Business District". The streets "Queen's Square, Sydney", "Phillip Street, Sydney" and "Elizabeth Street, Sydney" being more related to the building (since which the two historic and single modern buildings are on some of the streets. Two historic categories would have "Sydney CBD buildings on the New South Wales State Heritage Register", the architect(s), date built (if known) and the architectural style. This would mostly resolve the over categorisation issue (some would argue that the streets would be over cat). Hope that makes sense. Bidgee (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. Point taken and understood. I was getting tired. The SCNSW hasn’t always and won’t always sit in the buildings surrounding Queens Square; so there is some risk with the approach adopted. My thoughts are the SCNSW needs to be a holding category for SCNSW buildings, people, by decade, etc. Then for the buildings (my current focus), we should use the existing categories for location, architect, style, year completed/demolished, heritage status, materials, etc. Thoughts? Rangasyd (talk) 19:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Category: St Andrew's Cathedral School
[edit]Can you explain this edit? I don't see Category:Private schools in Sydney (or even "private schools") anywhere up the remaining hierarchy, but certainly it applies. - Jmabel ! talk 16:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Howdy. Thanks for your message. The old debate between independent school and private school. I’m trying to reclassify all schools in Australia that have been classified in their hierarchy as private schools to independent schools; across both Wikipedia and Wikimedia. SACS is just of those schools impacted. I’m slowly getting there. Cheers Rangasyd (talk) 16:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)