User talk:Smb1001
Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another wikipedia user link his local user page.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Joolz 01:52, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Cam-ouse 19.3.05.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cam-ouse 19.3.05.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 20:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Now tagged SMB
Image:Anglesey Abbey - 4.9.05.jpg
[edit]Your image of Anglesey Abbey has been posted as her own work by this Flickr account holder http://www.flickr.com/photos/london_heiress86/842584854/
To complain about this copyright infringement please see http://docs.yahoo.com/info/copyright/copyright.html
Was already removed when I visited SMB (4.4.08)
Thankyou for donating File:St Etheldreda's Church, Reach.jpg. However, your photo does not resemble Historic England's description of St Etheldreda's Church, Reach, which is here:
This is a photo of listed building number 1162403. |
The church which does fit that discription is here: File:Holy Trinity church and war memorial at Reach - geograph.org.uk - 493247.jpg.
I apologise for asking you to cast your mind back more than six years, but please can you work out what church your photo really is? It's a good photo of an interesting church. I'd like to get it properly categorised so that people can find and use it!
Thankyou, Motacilla (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- I have now identified the church in your photo. It is in fact Category:Holy Trinity church, Bottisham. Sorry to have troubled you!
- Best wishes, Motacilla (talk) 11:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Smb1001,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Clare Memorial Court gate to UL
[edit]
Hello Smb1001 -- First, let me write a heartfelt thanks for your efforts at documenting listed buildings in Cambridge; your photos are excellent and truly much appreciated. I'm enquiring about your photo of the Clare Memorial Court gates to the UL; it's clearly a different gate from the one illustrated by the Images of England photograph in the listing [1], which I was very surprised was listed. If you are sure you are correct, should someone inform Historic England that their image is incorrect? Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 03:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- You're very welcome -- it's forced me to get out on my bike around the city on many a sunny day! When I'm taking the pictures I often rue that I'm doing them on my phone rather than with a decent SLR as they merit, so I'm glad you think they're not too bad.
- I remember noting their picture of Clare's gates on was wrong, very much not the first time I've spotted a wrong image on the Historic England pages. But my best guess is that their images all come from volunteers wandering around tracking down the listings, so they're no more or less likely to get them right than we are. In this case I'm sure my image is right as the listing talks of "vase finials", which rules out theirs. The Historic England image is the gate at the centre of the image here, though you can't see the gates as they're open. Very much not a gate "to the University Library". (My image is of the gates at the centre of [2].)
- I imagine you already know of it, but my driver for adding the images was the excellent wikishootme site which finds Wikidata entries with no image. I've eliminated as many of the reds as I can, with the remainder largely inside colleges (or randomly-positioned companies). All the best, Smb1001 (talk) 14:07, 21 December 2023 (UTC)