User talk:TornadoLGS
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 22:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
About the copyright of the Hackleburg EF5 image
[edit]https://i.imgur.com/5vtoslO.png
I gave alot of source of where I got the image from, the literal video where I took the screenshot from, and even named it's video's maker the artist not myself, I just can't give more credit that that
It's from a public video
[edit]I'm pretty sure the video's maker would be pretty pleased if he saw the tornado's main image made from his video. Sadly I can't ask the author since this video was made 9 years ago and he's not using youtube anymore as I see. If it's gonna be deleted then how can I add an image of the actual tornado as the front image and not some debris? The sole reason I made a wiki is to add this and the Tuscaloosa tornado wikipage an actual image of their very iconic tornadoes
About the images
[edit]Oh alright, I'm very new to wikipedia page editing but then I just let it be, sadly I can't get permission from him, there are no answer, also I have no idea where to find publicly copyright free images, hope someone will still replace the debris image, becouse that is not the tornado, and me myself loves seeing the actual tornado as the front image rather than the damage it done. Sorry for the problem. Also I removed the delete thing on the tuscaloosa image by an accident, tried to add the link where I got the image from
![]() |
File:2019 Allen, SD tornado.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Commons_Autopatrolled.svg/50px-Commons_Autopatrolled.svg.png)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. GPSLeo (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service
[edit]I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.
The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.
Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).
Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)