(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Dynamic provisioning in next-generation data centers with on-site power production | Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Future energy systems skip to main content
10.1145/2487166.2487182acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic provisioning in next-generation data centers with on-site power production

Published: 21 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The critical need for clean and economical sources of energy is transforming data centers that are primarily energy consumers to also energy producers. We focus on minimizing the operating costs of next-generation data centers that can jointly optimize the energy supply from on-site generators and the power grid, and the energy demand from servers as well as power conditioning and cooling systems. We formulate the cost minimization problem and present an offline optimal algorithm. For "on-grid" data centers that use only the grid, we devise a deterministic online algorithm that achieves the best possible competitive ratio of 2αあるふぁs, where αあるふぁs is a normalized look-ahead window size. The competitive ratio of an online algorithm is defined as the maximum ratio (over all possible inputs) between the algorithm's cost (with no or limited look-ahead) and the offline optimal assuming complete future information. We remark that the results hold as long as the overall energy demand (including server, cooling, and power conditioning) is a convex and increasing function in the total number of active servers and also in the total server load. For "hybrid" data centers that have on-site power generation in addition to the grid, we develop an online algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of at most Pmax(2--αあるふぁs)/co+cm/L [1+2 Pmax--co/Pmax(1+αあるふぁg], where αあるふぁs and αあるふぁg are normalized look-ahead window sizes, Pmax is the maximum grid power price, and L, co, and cm are parameters of an on-site generator.
Using extensive workload traces from Akamai with the corresponding grid power prices, we simulate our offline and online algorithms in a realistic setting. Our offline (resp., online) algorithm achieves a cost reduction of 25.8% (resp., 20.7%) for a hybrid data center and 12.3% (resp., 7.3%) for an on-grid data center. The cost reductions are quite significant and make a strong case for a joint optimization of energy supply and energy demand in a data center. A hybrid data center provides about 13% additional cost reduction over an on-grid data center representing the additional cost benefits that on-site power generation provides over using the grid alone.

References

[1]
Akamai tech. http://www.akamai.com.
[2]
Nationalgrid. https://www.nationalgridus.com/.
[3]
Pacific gas and electric company. http://www.pge.com/nots/rates/tariffs/rateinfo.shtml.
[4]
Tecogen. http://www.tecogen.com.
[5]
The weather channal. http://www.weather.com/.
[6]
Apple's onsite renewable energy, 2012. http://www.apple.com/environment/renewable-energy/.
[7]
Distributed generation, 2012. http://www.bloomenergy.com/fuel-cell/distributed-generation/.
[8]
C. Baldwin, K. Dale, and R. Dittrich. A study of the economic shutdown of generating units in daily dispatch. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems, 1959.
[9]
L. Barroso and U. Holzle. The case for energy-proportional computing. IEEE Computer, 2007.
[10]
A. Beloglazov, R. Buyya, Y. Lee, and A. Zomaya. A taxonomy and survey of energy-efficient data centers and cloud computing systems. Advances in Computers, 2011.
[11]
A. Borbely and J. Kreider. Distributed generation: the power paradigm for the new millennium. CRC Press, 2001.
[12]
A. Borodin and R. El-Yaniv. Online computation and competitive analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[13]
J. Chase, D. Anderson, P. Thakar, A. Vahdat, and R. Doyle. Managing energy and server resources in hosting centers. In Proc. ACM SIGOPS, 2001.
[14]
A.J. Conejo, M.A. Plazas, R. Espinola, and A.B. Molina. Day-ahead electricity price forecasting using the wavelet transform and arima models. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2005.
[15]
E. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1959.
[16]
R. Doyle, J. Chase, O. Asad, W. Jin, and A. Vahdat. Model-based resource provisioning in a web service utility. In Proc. USITS, 2003.
[17]
K. Fehrenbacher. ebay to build huge bloom energy fuel cell farm at data center. 2012. http://gigaom.com/cleantech/ebay-to-build-huge-bloom-energy-fuel-cell-farm-at-data-center/.
[18]
K. Fehrenbacher. Is it time for more off-grid options for data centers?. 2012. http://gigaom.com/cleantech/is-it-time-for-more-off-grid-options-for-data-centers/.
[19]
Daniel Gmach, Jerry Rolia, Ludmila Cherkasova, and Alfons Kemper. Workload analysis and demand prediction of enterprise data center applications. In Workload Characterization, 2007. IISWC 2007. IEEE 10th International Symposium on, 2007.
[20]
S. Kazarlis, A. Bakirtzis, and V. Petridis. A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 1996.
[21]
J. Koomey. Growth in data center electricity use 2005 to 2010. Analytics Press, 2010.
[22]
M. Lin, Z. Liu, A. Wierman, and L. Andrew. Online algorithms for geographical load balancing. In Proc. IEEE IGCC, 2012.
[23]
M. Lin, A. Wierman, L. Andrew, and E. Thereska. Dynamic right-sizing for power-proportional data centers. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2011.
[24]
Z. Liu, Y. Chen, C. Bash, A. Wierman, D. Gmach, Z. Wang, M. Marwah, and C. Hyser. Renewable and cooling aware workload management for sustainable data centers. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, 2012.
[25]
J. Lowesohn. Apple's main data center to go fully renewable this year. 2012. http://news.cnet.com/8301--13579\textunderscore 3-57436553-37/apples-main-data-center-to-go-fully-renewable-this-year/.
[26]
L. Lu, J. Tu, C. Chau, M. Chen, and X. Lin. Online energy generation scheduling for microgrids with intermittent energy sources and co-generation. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, 2013.
[27]
T. Lu and Chen M. Simple and effective dynamic provisioning for power-proportional data centers. In Proc. IEEE CISS, 2012.
[28]
V. Mathew, R. Sitaraman, and P. Shenoy. Energy-aware load balancing in content delivery networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2012.
[29]
J. Muckstadt and R. Wilson. An application of mixed-integer programming duality to scheduling thermal generating systems. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems, 1968.
[30]
E. Nygren, R. Sitaraman, and J. Sun. The Akamai Network: A platform for high-performance Internet applications. 2010.
[31]
N. Padhy. Unit commitment-a bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 2004.
[32]
D. Palasamudram, R. Sitaraman, B. Urgaonkar, and R. Urgaonkar. Using batteries to reduce the power costs of internet-scale distributed networks. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, 2012.
[33]
S. Pelley, D. Meisner, T. Wenisch, and J. VanGilder. Understanding and abstracting total data center power. In Workshop on Energy-Efficient Design, 2009.
[34]
E. Pinheiro, R. Bianchini, E. Carrera, and T. Heath. Load balancing and unbalancing for power and performance in cluster-based systems. In Workshop on compilers and operating systems for low power, 2001.
[35]
A. Qureshi, R. Weber, H. Balakrishnan, J. Guttag, and B. Maggs. Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2009.
[36]
T. Shiina and J. Birge. Stochastic unit commitment problem. International Trans. Operational Research, 2004.
[37]
M. Stadler, H. Aki, R. Lai, C. Marnay, and A. Siddiqui. Distributed energy resources on-site optimization for commercial buildings with electric and thermal storage technologies. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2008.
[38]
R. Stanojevic and R. Shorten. Distributed dynamic speed scaling. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2010.
[39]
J. Tu, L. Lu, M. Chen, and R. Sitaraman. Dynamic provisioning in next-generation data centers with on-site power production. Technical report, Department of Information Engineering, CUHK, 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6775.
[40]
H. Xu, C. Feng, and B. Li. Temperature aware workload management in geo-distributed datacenters. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, extended abstract, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Combination optimization of green energy supply in data center based on simulated annealing particle swarm optimization algorithmFrontiers in Earth Science10.3389/feart.2023.113452311Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Battery-Assisted Online Operation of Distributed Data Centers With Uncertain Workload and Electricity PricesIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing10.1109/TCC.2021.313217411:2(1303-1314)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Competitive prediction-aware online algorithms for energy generation scheduling in microgridsProceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems10.1145/3538637.3538867(383-394)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
e-Energy '13: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Future energy systems
January 2013
306 pages
ISBN:9781450320528
DOI:10.1145/2487166
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data centers
  2. dynamic provisioning
  3. on-site power production
  4. online algorithm

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

e-Energy '13
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

e-Energy '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 76 submissions, 53%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 160 of 446 submissions, 36%

Upcoming Conference

E-Energy '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Combination optimization of green energy supply in data center based on simulated annealing particle swarm optimization algorithmFrontiers in Earth Science10.3389/feart.2023.113452311Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Battery-Assisted Online Operation of Distributed Data Centers With Uncertain Workload and Electricity PricesIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing10.1109/TCC.2021.313217411:2(1303-1314)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Competitive prediction-aware online algorithms for energy generation scheduling in microgridsProceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems10.1145/3538637.3538867(383-394)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Probability-Based Online Algorithm for Switch Operation of Energy Efficient Data CenterIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing10.1109/TCC.2019.293196110:1(608-618)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Encrypted Network Traffic Classification and Resource Allocation with Deep Learning in Software Defined NetworkWireless Personal Communications10.1007/s11277-021-08403-5127:1(749-765)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2021
  • (2020)Online Linear Optimization with Inventory Management ConstraintsProceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems10.1145/33794824:1(1-29)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2020
  • (2019)Online Linear Programming with Uncertain Constraints : (Invited Paper)2019 53rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)10.1109/CISS.2019.8693056(1-6)Online publication date: Mar-2019
  • (2018)Multiple Granularity Online Control of Cloudlet Networks for Edge Computing2018 15th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)10.1109/SAHCN.2018.8397141(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2018
  • (2018)Best Practices for Sustainable DatacentersIT Professional10.1109/MITP.2018.05389133820:5(57-67)Online publication date: Sep-2018
  • (2018)Online Control of Cloud and Edge Resources Using Inaccurate Predictions2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS)10.1109/IWQoS.2018.8624119(1-6)Online publication date: Jun-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media