(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
On-road Stress Analysis for In-car Interventions During the Commute | Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3312824acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

On-road Stress Analysis for In-car Interventions During the Commute

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on the larger question of when to administer in-car just-in-time stress management interventions. We look at the influence of driving-related stress to find the right time to provide personalized and contextually-aware interventions. We address this challenge with a data driven approach that takes into consideration driving-induced stress, driver (cognitive) availability, and indicators of risky driving behavior such as lane departures and high steering reversal rates. We ran a study with sixteen commuters during morning and evening traffic while applying an in-situ experience sampling. During 45 minutes of driving through various scenarios including city, highway, and neighborhood roads we captured physiological measurements, video of participants and surroundings, and CAN bus driving data. Initial review of the data shows that stress levels changed greatly between 2 and 9 (out of a 0-min to 10-max scale). We conclude with a discussion on how to prepare the data to train supervised algorithms to find the right time to intervene stress while driving.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw2110p.mp4

mp4

6.8 MB

References

  1. Stephanie Balters, Elizabeth Murnane, James A. Landay, and Pablo E. Paredes. 2018. Breath Booster! Exploring In-car, Fast-paced Breathing Interventions to Enhance Driver Arousal State. Proceedings of the PervasiveHealth Conference (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sonia Baltodano, Jesus Garcia-Mancilla, and Wendy Ju. 2018. Eliciting Driver Stress Using Naturalistic Driving Scenarios on Real Roads. In Proceedings of Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 298--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Reed Larson. 2014. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Springer, 35--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lex Fridman, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, and William T. Freeman. 2018. Cognitive Load Estimation in the Wild. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Javier Hernandez, Daniel McDuff, Xavier Benavides, Judith Amores, Pattie Maes, and Rosalind Picard. 2014. AutoEmotive: bringing empathy to the driving experience to manage stress. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Robert R. McCrae. 1984. Situational determinants of coping responses: Loss, threat, and challenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 4 (1984), 919.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brian McKenzie. 2015. Who drives to work? Commuting by automobile in the United States: 2013. American Community Survey Reports (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pablo E. Paredes, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Mary Czerwinski, Asta Roseway, Kael Rowan, and Javier Hernandez. 2014. PopTherapy: coping with stress through pop-culture. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 109--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Pablo E. Paredes, Nur Hamdan, Dav Clark, Carrie Cai, Wendy Ju, and James A. Landay. 2017. Evaluating in-car movements in the design of mindful commute interventions: exploratory study. Journal of medical Internet research 19, 12 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Pablo E. Paredes, Francisco Ordonez, Wendy Ju, and James A. Landay. 2018. Fast & Furious: Detecting Stress with a Car Steering Wheel. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Pablo E. Paredes, Yijun Zhou, Nur Al-Huda Hamdan, Stephanie Balters, Elizabeth Murnane, Wendy Ju, and James A. Landay. 2018. Just Breathe: In-Car Interventions for Guided Slow Breathing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018), 28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Matthew P. Reed and Paul A. Green. 1999. Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics 42, 8 (1999), 1015--1037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jonathan W. Roberti, Lisa N. Harrington, and Eric A. Storch. 2006. Further psychometric support for the 10-item version of the perceived stress scale. Journal of College Counseling 9, 2 (2006), 135--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. James A. Russell, Anna Weiss, and Gerald A. Mendelsohn. 1989. Affect grid: a single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 3 (1989), 493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. SAE ISO Standards. 2015. Operational Definitions of Driving Performance Measures and Statistics. Society of Automotive Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mark Vollrath, Tobias Meilinger, and Hans-Peter Krüger. 2002. How the presence of passengers influences the risk of a collision with another vehicle. Accident Analysis & Prevention 34, 5 (2002), 649--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On-road Stress Analysis for In-car Interventions During the Commute

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      3673 pages
      ISBN:9781450359719
      DOI:10.1145/3290607

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format