Illogicopedia:Votes for Feature

This is for articles; see also: Illogicopedia:Featured images

This section is Logical; it is meant to be so. Prepare to get bored!

Sensible Section

This page displays all of the current votes. See Forum:Department of Limelight for a summary index of nominated articles and the other non-article-vote-related things handled there.

Previous article nominations can be found here - or separately, the featured, the ones waiting to be featured and the ones that failed. This category tree also contains all nominated pages and their votes. (Useful for checking that the VFF template has been added/removed correctly.)

For how to feature or fail an article, see here.

Nomination

Enter the full name of the article below (Make sure to use proper capitalization.) and then click "Nominate", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry. If the page already exists, you can either try to fix the "Revoting" option or give up.

Revolting

If you think a previously failed nomination has a chance at winning a revote, you can re-nominate it below. (note that repeated renomination of a page without good reason is frowned upon – a review of the article is recommended) Once again, enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Revote", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry.

Current votes

VOTING REGULATIONS

There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics: Users are permitted one vote each. Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment. Remember to sign and to update the vote count. Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against". Take care not to overdo self-nomination. If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags. Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged. Click here for more details

Alcoholic monkeys (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0)	Nomination by Fenris2010 (talk) 02:12, 19 Ergust 2024 (UTC)
For:	For.  Fenris2010 Tell Fenris2010 to stop stealing monkeys. 02:12, 19 Ergust 2024 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Crigmas (vote)

Score: -2 (0-2)	Nomination by That1Gato (talk) 03:37, 8 Ditzimber 2023 (UTC)
For:
Against:	Against An average article, nothing special about it. --toxw@rmtalk 06:52, 18 Ditzimber 2023 (UTC) Against It's not a good enough monkey. Fenris2010 (talk) 18:47, 14 Ergust 2024 (UTC)
Comments:

Year of creation of the toaster (vote)

Score: -1 (0-1)	Nomination by Emicraft (talk) 22:33, 16 Arply 2024 (UTC)
For:
Against:	Against Too short.  Fenris2010 Tell Fenris2010 to stop stealing monkeys.
Comments:	Useful information Emicraft (talk) 22:33, 16 Arply 2024 (UTC)

Sayings (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0)	Nomination by Fredisfredisfred (talk) 14:42, 27 Octodest 2023 (UTC)
For:	For. I like the way he/she incorporates the sayings into it.
Against:
Comments:

! (video game) (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0)	Nomination by Fluffalizer 16:28, 20 Serpeniver 2023 (UTC)
For:	Well played. --Fluffalizer 16:28, 20 Serpeniver 2023 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	The images don't show for me, looking blank, but the smaller thumbnails on the file pages work. It would be better with unbroken images. --Fluffalizer 16:28, 20 Serpeniver 2023 (UTC)

UR MOM (vote)

Score: -1 (1-2)	Nomination by 162.233.177.60 17:17, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
For:	epic -162.233.177.60 17:17, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Against:	Fail. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 19:52, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC) it could be longer Taxworm (talk) 20:54, 9 Novelniver 2022 (UTC) i expand it for no reason now --Doctor DUuH 23:27, 17 Novelniver 2022 (UTC)
Comments:	Personally, I think it needs a little more content. Sylvester Gold is a Fruity Little Fairy! 19:01, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)

Nerds (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1)	Nomination by 2600:4040:937B:1B00:6D4A:20F6:688C:374D 22:16, 5 Arply 2023 (UTC)
For:
Against:	No. Too tedious. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 15:55, 6 Arply 2023 (UTC)
Comments:

butter (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Rrrrrrmf kjfrjnf (talk) 15:11, 29 Arche 2022 (UTC)
For:	Haha yes Doctor DUuH 03:54, 11 Ditzimber 2022 (UTC) Absolute yes Taxworm (talk) 09:58, 11 Ditzimber 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

ISO (vote)

Score: 3 (3-0)	Nomination by Taxworm (talk) 09:18, 19 Novelniver 2022 (UTC)
For:	Om nom nom and For. Dr. DUuH suggested this. Taxworm (talk) 09:18, 19 Novelniver 2022 (UTC) For. #ISO. Doctor DUuH For. Per Dr. DUuH. Tails6000D (T C E) 01:45, 3 Ditzimber 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Idk (vote)

Score: 1 (2-1)	Nomination by 49.245.121.193 15:24, 8 Arche 2020 (UTC)
For:	░██. Taxworm (talk) 14:36, 21 Novelniver 2022 (UTC)
Against:	Nah CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 20:11, 8 Arche 2020 (UTC)
Comments:

Mort (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Bobo Monkey
For:	Bobo Monkey --Bobo (talk / stalk) This is great. Taxworm (talk) 20:57, 9 Novelniver 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

69 (vote)

Score: 1 (2-1)	Nomination by (A) *user who# couldn't decide o^n a username (or signature) (talk) 15:44, 25 Arche 2021 (UTC)
For:	Ok, final self-nomination. plz make featured. -15:44, 25 Arche 2021 (UTC) "HELP!!! HE'S APART OF THE CABAL!!!!!!!" really got me. I think it deserves it. --Doctor DUuH 23:26, 17 Novelniver 2022 (UTC)
Against:	Nowhere near feature quality CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 15:10, 26 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Comments:	why no where near -(A) *user who# couldn't decide o^n a username (or signature) (talk) 17:09, 26 Arche 2021 (UTC) Because I don't think it is. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 17:48, 26 Arche 2021 (UTC)

Not so Fairy Tales (vote)

Score: 1.5 (2.5-1)	Nomination by Fiery Meme (talk) 02:01, 22 Farbleum 2018 (UTC)
For:	Yes. Because this article exists. I need no other reason--The preceding unsigned comment was left by Fiery Meme (talk | stalk), see the past frenzies page for posting time Miniature-for It's a solid article, but it could do with a picture or two. XY007 (talk - contribs - business) 04:23, 22 Farbleum 2018 (UTC) For. How many?--The preceding unsigned comment was left by Sophia (talk | stalk), see the past frenzies page for posting time
Against:	On rereading this, I'd rather not. It gets off to a good start, but a lot of it seems to consist of a poop joke. I might add images later. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:50, 10 Arche 2019 (UTC)
Comments:	Sitting on the fence. It's pointy. I edited it a bit. The article, not the fence. How do you edit a fence? ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:34, 8 Jumbly 2018 (UTC)

Good electricity and bad electricity (vote)

Score: 2.5 (2.5-0)	Nomination by (kaizum me) 15:40, 4 Jeremy 2016 (UTC)
For:	For - A dazzling surreal dip into the story of elextrikity. (kaizum me) 15:40, 4 Jeremy 2016 (UTC) Decent enough. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 04:03, 8 Jumbly 2018 (UTC) Half-For: i'm not sure why but this one vibes with me. something feels off though :: Felis Lupis (talk) 19:53, 28 Arply 2021 (UTC) For. Niece one :) Taxworm (talk) 09:33, 29 Octodest 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	Ehm... abstain for now. I don't see the relative merits of THIS article, but it's OK. Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 00:34, 6 Jeremy 2016 (UTC)

Pasta (vote)

Score: 0 (0-0)	Nomination by 216.125.34.183 14:37, 14 Arply 2022 (UTC)
For:	216.125.34.183 14:37, 14 Arply 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Avril Lavigne Reference Desk (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 01:00, 6 Arche 2016 (UTC)
For:	Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri I quite like this article. Though it'd be best served renaming it to Avril Lavigne and Summer Glau Reference Desk. This ends the pre-recorded message by Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 01:00, 6 Arche 2016 (UTC) OK, yeah. I remember this from a while back. :) -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:54, 11 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	This seems to be a parody of Wikipedia's reference desk. I'm not enough into pop culture to really appreciate this, I shouldn't think. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 00:15, 18 Yoon 2018 (UTC)

Less than three (vote)

Score: 1 (2-1)	Nomination by Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 22:18, 26 Arche 2017 (UTC)
For:	This article proves that it doesn't need to be long to be good-quality. Also, it seems to lacks the 'new' steps to getting featured, because Awesomedecks didn't praise this article more than anything else, nor harass other people's talk pages, OR spam links to it on another website. Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 22:18, 26 Arche 2017 (UTC) GOD DAMMIT THAT ICE CREAM MADE ME VOTE 👈 lol 👉  lol w/ me●lawl Labzz History of lulzz 08:07, 6 Arply 2017 (UTC)
Against:	Clever but doesn't catch my interest enough. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:21, 10 Arche 2019 (UTC)
Comments:	I found it to be meh. It's OK, but I don't see a compelling reason to feature it. Convince me to vote one way or the other. (kaizum me) 03:50, 27 Arche 2017 (UTC) I just like it because it has a crescendo, and then shatters your expectations completely. Sort of like climbing a building, only to find that the observation deck has no floor. Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 04:00, 27 Arche 2017 (UTC)

magnetic trousers (vote)

{{VFH_vote.table|nominator=Japanese Cat (talk) 19:49, 18 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC) |for_count=1 |for=

• For. I kind of like this article. It's simple, elegant, and plenty illogical. Kow Tow to Mao (talk) 18:41, 5 Farbleum 2019 (UTC)

|against_count=1 |against=

• There's not enough in those three lines. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 02:55, 2 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)

|comments=*I think this user should make a comment why s/he has nominated it.--The Pioneer (A.K.A. 開ひらくかい拓たくたく者ものしゃ) 09:15, 19 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC)

• • Agreed. Also, maybe in the meantime more stuff will be added to the article? :-) -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:24, 9 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
    • I think this article is simple fun without being long or complex --User:Japanese Cat/sig

|Illogicopedia:VFH/magnetic trousers=Illogicopedia:VFH/magnetic trousers|magnetic trousers=VFH/magnetic trousers|2018-12-18=2018-12-18|Japanese Cat=Japanese Cat|%ARGS%=§nominator=User:Japanese Cat§Japanese Cat (User talk:Japanese Cat§talk) 19:49, 18 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC) §for_count=1 §for=

• For. I kind of like this article. It's simple, elegant, and plenty illogical. User:Kow Tow to Mao§Kow Tow to Mao (User talk:Kow Tow to Mao§talk) 18:41, 5 Farbleum 2019 (UTC)

§against_count=1 §against=

• There's not enough in those three lines. {:User:Flyingcat/sig} 02:55, 2 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)

§comments=*I think this user should make a comment why s/he has nominated it.--{User:The_Pioneer/Sig} 09:15, 19 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC)

• • Agreed. Also, maybe in the meantime more stuff will be added to the article? :-) -- {:User:Hindleyite/sig} 17:24, 9 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
    • I think this article is simple fun without being long or complex --{User:Japanese Cat/sig}

}}

Battle for Terraria (vote)

Score: 0 (0-0)	Nomination by 69.58.53.6 18:12, 6 Farbleum 2020 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:

The Stranger (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Nothinggetspastyou (talk) 06:59, 17 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC)
For:	self nom & for sure why not That's some white men all right. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 02:51, 2 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Captain Censor (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1)	Nomination by 162.233.177.60 22:15, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
For:	EPIC -162.233.177.60 22:15, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Against:	Just kinda meh. But that's just my opinion. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 01:26, 4 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Comments:

Cat (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by The most Awesome of Cats (talk) 14:24, 10 Novelniver 2020 (UTC)
For:	we need new featured content 104.225.183.70 14:35, 10 Novelniver 2020 (UTC) Simply because of the fact that nothing been refeatured before is enough for my vote. -(A) *user who# couldn't decide o^n a username (or signature) (talk) 21:24, 18 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	This NEEDS to be refeatured! IT IZ ABOOT KIIITEHZZ! The most Awesome of Cats (talk) 14:24, 10 Novelniver 2020 (UTC) I don't think we refeature articles. I'm not aware that we've ever done that before. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 17:26, 14 Ditzimber 2020 (UTC)

---