(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Opera buffa: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Talk:Opera buffa: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
5,518,786 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Opera}}.
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Educational assignment}}
: It is sometimes affirmed that in Opera buffa musical content is often simpler, maybe poorer, limited in length and in fantasy, and these would be sufficient reasons not to include it in the higher genres. Nevertheless, the (now) not discussed genius of Mozart didn't miss the chance of giving us a masterpiece (''Le nozze di Figaro'' - in Italian), or perhaps two (with ''Don Giovanni'') and was followed by pretty all the major composers.
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Music/Music genres task force}}
{{WikiProject Opera}}
}}
{{Archives|search=yes}}
==Section: Mozart's Opera Buffa==
The Opera Buffa article is brief and concise; as it should be for an opening definition.
 
However, I feel that Mozart has made an incredibly important effort to the rise and progress of Opera Buffa. Mozart's operas embodied the social constructs of the day and catapulted them into the future. It is important to recognize these traditional views and how Mozart's operas reformed these ideas. Specifically I am looking at Don Giovanni, Le Nozze di Figaro, and Cosi Fan Tutte which challenged the ideas of hierarchy and the role of women. These three operas are 3 of the most recognizable operas in the style of buffa and it would be a shame not to focus on them and how they changed society. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Klai01|Klai01]] ([[User talk:Klai01|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Klai01|contribs]]) 23:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I suggest rewriting this paragraph entirely. Discussions about what is a 'higher' genre and what is or is not a 'masterpiece', and whether Mozart is a 'genius' or not, are not encyclopedic. Trying to determine which pieces of Mozart are masterpieces is certainly not encyclopedic. Any objections? [[User:Victor Gijsbers|Victor Gijsbers]] 15:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 
:[[User:Klai01|Klai01]]: Much of this new section (that you have just written) needs editing (lots of wrong capitalization, typos, English problems etc.) but much of it is also of limited relevance to this article (Mary Wollstonecraft etc.). I suggest moving usable material to the articles about the specific operas, where general discussions about social significance etc. are appropriate. --''[[User:Kleinzach|<span style="color:#FF4500;letter-spacing:2px;">Klein</span>]][[User talk:Kleinzach|<span style="padding:0px 0px 1px 2px;color:white; background-color:#ACE1AF;letter-spacing:2px;">zach</span>]]'' 05:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
----
Thought I'd put up a real article here to foil the useless content vandals. Needs a lookover by someone more knowledgeable in such matters. Then again, I learn the most by doing such articles, heck I even learned a little Italian as the opera names were in Italian on the sites I found. Am trying to look up Verdi via search so I can wikify him correctly, but seems to be taking forever so I'll clean up a bit later tonight if it doesn't clear up. [[user:Rgamble|Rgamble]]
 
: I put up an alternate article under [[Comic opera]]. There doesn't seem to be too much overlap, so I don't see a need to merge. [[User:Jeffmatt|Jeffmatt]] 08:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 
----
Just wanted to thank Gianfranco for majorly fleshing out the stub making it a very interesting read, and Vicki for copyediting it. Oh and April for finding the link for an Italian phrase. Nice job so far! [[user:Rgamble|Rgamble]]
:Thank you for reading it - go on with your Italian, there's so much to write about opera! :-)) --[[user:Gianfranco|Gianfranco]]
 
-----
What is correct: Dramma giocoso, or Dramma giocosa?<br>
S.
 
: Dramma '''giocoso'''. "Dramma" is one of those nouns in Italian that is grammatically masculine in spite of the -a at the end. Thus, the adjective takes the masculine -o ending. [[User:Jeffmatt|Jeffmatt]] 08:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 
== weird vandalism ==
 
http://listproc.ucdavis.edu/archives/mlist/log0402/0004.html
 
Referring to this website, which makes claims to Florence Foster Jenkins who was actually the official founder of Opera Buffa, since leading founders of the music such as Mozat-Garden had failed to copyright the style with 'first rights'.
 
She has certainly made Opera Buffa her own with contentious notes and stretched pitches that create the airy atmosphere composers have lacked when writing for this form of high-brow intellectual opera.
 
On the basis that composers in Opera Buffa have to achieve a whole range of chromatic chords to outway the low-class diatonic melodies that play havoc with the decibel limits of Opera Buffa's audience.
 
Due to Florence Foster Jenkins talents in establishing such a concept has led to composers writing such classics like Titty Titty Bang Bang and Mary Popouts. The form has really shot its load in popular culture and its parody nature certainly stir the loins of its higher class listeners.
 
Though this vandalism should be preserved on the talk page due to its clever use of double entendres.
[[User:Tmorrisey|Tmorrisey]] 04:57, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 
==Suggestion of a merger under 'Comic Opera'==
 
I am strongly against merging this with ''Comic Opera'', A merger would imply that ''opera buffa'' is sub-genre of ''comic opera''. I don't agree with this. in my view, ''opera buffa'' is a genre but ''comic opera'' is merely the qualification of opera by an adjective. (We can substitute ''long'', ''tragic'', ''boring'' or whatever for comic.)
 
My proof of argument would be that comic operas include works like ''[[Die Meistersinger]]'' and ''[[Falstaff]]'' all the way across the opera spectrum to Gilbert and Sullivan. Clearly these works do not belong together in a single genre.
 
How about removing the merger banner?
 
[[User:Kleinzach|Kleinzach]] 13:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 
:I agree strongly with Kleinzach. Opere buffe, operas comiques, and comic operas are all different entities, and the terms mean different things.
 
:[[User:Buondelmonte|Buondelmonte]]
 
:::As there have been no dissenting voices on this, i will remove the merger suggestion flag. Thanks. - [[User:Kleinzach|Kleinzach]] 16:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 
:::I agree with the above action and am glad to see that Kleinzach has gone ahead.
 
:::[[User:Vivaverdi|Vivaverdi]] 23:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 
::::I'm the person who added the merge tag. The problem with the article as it stands is that the only relationship described between this and [[comic opera]] is a parenthetical in the intro. This implies that they are the same thing, but does not explain why they have different articles. Can we do one of:
::::* Merge the two articles (opera buffa could be a section in comic opera, describing the nature of the relationship clearly)
::::* Change both articles to refernece each other more constructively, explaining their relationship.
::::* Or, just do the least work by placing the link to each other in a see also section on both.
::::IMHO, those are listed in descending order of value to both topics, but I'm willing to bow to consensus. The fact that this article is linked to from the front page today, and is in the shape that it's in is sort of embarassing.... -[[User:Harmil|Harmil]] 15:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 
:::::Thank you for your message to my user page. Have you also notified [[User:Vivaverdi|Vivaverdi]] and [[User:Buondelmonte|Buondelmonte]] ? I don't regard [[opera buffa]] and [[Comic opera]] as the same thing as I explained above. I'd prefer to have this discussion on the [[Comic opera]] page as I think the problem is there not here. How about it? (Meanwhile I have done links between the pages as an interim measure as per your suggestion above.) - [[User:Kleinzach|Kleinzach]] 20:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 
== So what is it? ==
 
The article lacks to tell the characteristics that make opera buffa recognizable among other genres of opera. I don't care about its history if I really haven't learned what is it... --[[User:Euyyn|euyyn]] 22:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 
:This is an encyclopedia. It is here to provide factual information. I would recommend getting hold of a recording of either [[Il barbiere di Siviglia]] or [[Le nozze di Figaro]] and having a good listen. Incidentally few of the earlier [[opera buffa]] are performed these days. - [[User:Kleinzach|Kleinzach]] 15:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 
I'll try to explain better:
 
- So what's that "Opera Buffa"?
 
- Look it up in the encyclopaedia.
 
- Yeah... It's... "El barbero de Sevilla" and "Las bodas de Figaro" and (continue enumerating). And why these? And why no other operas?
 
- Well... Don't really know... That wouldn't be "factual information"... Maybe some random guy selected them randomly, then selected a name randomly, and...
 
C'mon... I don't want to know those operas, I'm curious about why there's a subset of all operas called this way --[[User:Euyyn|euyyn]] 16:02, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 
:It's a genre. Opera is divided into genre. Other art forms are also divided into genre. See [[Genre]]. - [[User:Kleinzach|Kleinzach]] 16:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Opera_buffa"