(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Mana (Oceanian cultures): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Mana (Oceanian cultures): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎{{anchor|In Hawaiian and Tahitian culture}}Hawaiian and Tahitian culture: Removing wikilink, which goes to an African name, obviously unrelated to Polynesian mana.
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Life force energy, power, effectiveness, and prestige in Pacific Island culture}}
{{other uses}}
{{Italic title}}
{{EngvarB|date=October 2015}}
Line 7 ⟶ 6:
{{Paranormal}}
 
According toIn [[MelanesiansMelanesian mythology|Melanesian]] and [[PolynesiansPolynesian culture|Polynesian]] mythologycultures, '''''mana''''' is thea spiritual life[[supernatural]] force energy or healing power that permeates the universe.<ref name="britannica">{{Cite web |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/mana-Polynesian-and-Melanesian-religion |title=Mana (Polynesian and Melanesian religion) |website=[[Encyclopedia Britannica]] |language=en|access-date=28 November 2019}}</ref> Anyone or anything can have ''mana''. They believed it to be a cultivation or possession of energy and power, rather than being a source of power.<ref name="britannica" /> It is an intentional force.<ref name="britannica" />
 
''Mana'' has been discussed mostly in relation to cultures of [[Polynesian mythology|Polynesia]], but also of [[Melanesia]], notably the [[Solomon Islands]]<ref>{{Cite book| publisher = Columbia University Press| last = Keesing| first = Roger| title = Kwaio Religion: The Living and the Dead in a Solomon Island Society| location = New York| date = 1982}}</ref>{{sfn|Keesing|1984}} and [[Vanuatu]].<ref name="Codrington">{{harvcoltxt|Codrington|1891|p=118 ff.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.2307/2843828| issn = 0307-3114| volume = 61| pages = 157–166| last = Ivens| first = W. G.| title = The Place of Vui and Tamate in the Religion of Mota.| journal = The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland | date = 1931| jstor = 2843828}}</ref>{{sfn|Mondragón|2004}}<ref>{{Citation
In the 19th century, scholars compared ''mana'' to similar concepts such as the ''[[orenda]]'' of the [[Iroquois Indian]]s and theorized that ''mana'' was a universal phenomenon that explained the [[origin of religion]]s.<ref name="britannica" />
| last = François
| first = Alexandre
| author-link =Alexandre François
| contribution = Shadows of bygone lives: The histories of spiritual words in northern Vanuatu
| editor1-last = Mailhammer
| editor1-first = Robert
| title = Lexical and structural etymology: Beyond word histories
| volume = 11
| pages = 185–244
| publisher = DeGruyter Mouton
| place = Berlin
| year = 2013
| series = Studies in Language Change
| isbn =
| contribution-url = https://marama.huma-num.fr/data/AlexFrancois_2013_Shadows-of-bygone-lives-The-histories-of-spiritual-words-in-northern-Vanuatu.pdf
| chapter-format =
| url=
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1353/ol.2022.0017| volume = 61| issue = 1| pages = 212–255| last = François| first = Alexandre | title = Awesome forces and warning signs: Charting the semantic history of *tabu words in Vanuatu| journal = Oceanic Linguistics| access-date = 2022-07-11| date = 2022| url = https://marama.huma-num.fr/data/AlexFrancois_2022_Awesome-Forces_Tabu_Vanuatu_OceanicLinguistics.pdf |ref=tabu}}</ref>
 
In the 19th century, scholars compared ''mana'' to similar concepts such as the ''[[orenda]]'' of the [[Iroquois Indian]]s Indians and theorized that ''mana'' was a universal phenomenon that explained the [[origin of religion]]s.<ref name="britannica" />
''Mana'' is not universal to all of [[Melanesia]].<ref name="britannica" />
 
==Etymology==
The [[Linguistic reconstruction|reconstructed]] [[Proto-Oceanic language|Proto-Oceanic]] word "*mana" is thought to have referred to "powerful forces of nature such as thunder and storm winds" rather than supernatural power.<ref name="Blust">{{cite journal |last1=Blust|first1=Robert|author-link=Robert Blust |date=2007 |title=Proto-Oceanic *mana Revisited |url=https://www.academia.edu/21896750 |journal=[[Oceanic Linguistics]] |volume=46 |issue=2|pages=404–423|doi=10.1353/ol.2008.0005|s2cid=144945623}}</ref> That meaning became detached asAs the [[Oceanic languages|Oceanic-speaking]] peoples [[Austronesian expansion|spread eastward]] and, the word started to refer instead to unseen supernatural powers.<ref name="Blust"/>
 
=={{anchor|In Polynesian culture}}Polynesian culture==
''Mana'' is a foundation of [[Polynesian culture|Polynesian theology]], a spiritual quality with a supernatural origin and a sacred, impersonal force. To have ''mana'' implies influence, [[authority]], and [[efficacy]]: the ability to perform in a given situation. The quality of ''mana'' is not limited to individuals; peoples, governments, places and inanimate objects may also possess ''mana'', and its possessors are accorded respect. ''Mana'' protects its protector and they depend on each other for growth both positive and negative. It depends on the person where he takes his ''mana''.{{cn|date=May 2023}}
 
In Polynesia, ''mana'' was traditionally seen as a "[[Transcendence (philosophy)|transcendent]] power that [[Blessing|blesses]]" that can "express itself directly" through various ways, but most often shows itself through the [[speech]], movement, or [[Tradition|traditional]] [[ritual]] of a "[[prophet]], [[priest]], or [[king]]."<ref name=":3">{{Cite book |last1=Carlson |first1=Kathie |title=The Book of Symbols: Reflections on Archetypal Images |last2=Flanagin |first2=Michael N. |last3=Martin |first3=Kathleen |last4=Martin |first4=Mary E. |last5=Mendelsohn |first5=John |last6=Rodgers |first6=Priscilla Young |last7=Ronnberg |first7=Ami |last8=Salman |first8=Sherry |last9=Wesley |first9=Deborah A. |publisher=[[Taschen]] |year=2010 |isbn=978-3-8365-1448-4 |editor-last=Arm |editor-first=Karen |location=Köln |page=730 |editor-last2=Ueda |editor-first2=Kako |editor-last3=Thulin |editor-first3=Anne |editor-last4=Langerak |editor-first4=Allison |editor-last5=Kiley |editor-first5=Timothy Gus |editor-last6=Wolff |editor-first6=Mary}}</ref>
 
==={{anchor|In Hawaiian and Tahitian culture}}Hawaiian and Tahitian culture===
In [[Hawaii]]an and [[Tahiti]]an mythologyculture, ''mana'' is a [[Energy (esotericism)|spiritual energy]] and healing power which can exist in places, objects and persons. Hawaiians believe that ''mana'' may be gained or lost by actions, and Hawaiians and Tahitians believe that ''mana'' is both external and internal. Sites on the [[Hawaiian Islands]] and in [[French Polynesia]] are believed to possess ''mana''—for example, the top rim of the [[Haleakalā]] volcano on the island of [[Maui]] and the [[Taputapuatea marae]] on the island of [[Raiatea]] in the [[Society Islands]].{{cn|date=May 2023}}
 
Ancient Hawaiians also believed that the island of [[Molokaʻi]] possessed ''mana'', compared with its neighboring islands. Before the unification of the [[Kingdom of Hawaii]] by [[Kamehameha I|King Kamehameha I]], battles were fought for possession of the island and its south-shore fish ponds which existed until the late 19th century.{{cn|date=May 2023}}
 
A person may gain ''mana'' by ''[[Pono (word)|pono]]'' (right actions). In ancient Hawaii, there were two paths to ''mana'': sexual means or violence. In at least this tradition, nature is seen as dualistic, and everything has a counterpart. A balance between the gods [[Kū]] and [[Lono]] formed, through whom are the two paths to ''mana'' (''ʻimihaku'', or the search for ''mana''). Kū, the god of war and politics, offers ''mana'' through violence; this was how Kamehameha gained his ''mana''. Lono, the god of peace and fertility, offers ''mana'' through sexuality.{{citation needed|date=September 2017}}
Prayers were believed to have mana, which was sent to the akua at the end when the priest usually said "amama ua noa," meaning "the prayer is now free or flown."<ref>{{Cite book|author=Cunningham, Scott|url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/663898381|title=Hawaiian religion and magic|date=1995|publisher=Llewellyn Publications|isbn=1-56718-199-6|pagespage=15|oclc=663898381}}</ref>
 
=== {{anchor|In New Zealand culture}}Māori (New Zealand) culture ===
 
===={{anchor|In Māori usage}}Māori use====
In [[Māori language|Māori]], a tribe with ''mana whenua'' must have demonstrated their authority over a territory. In [[Māori culture|Maori mythology]], there are two essential aspects of a person's ''mana'': ''mana [[tangata whenua|tangata]]'', authority derived from [[whakapapa]] ([[genealogy]]) and ''mana [[huaanga]]'', defined as "authority derived from having a wealth of resources to [[gift economy|gift to others to bind them into reciprocal obligations]]".<ref>{{cite book|title=The Whanganui River report (Wai 167).|date=1999|publisher=GP Publications|location=Wellington, New Zealand|isbn=186956250X1-86956-250-X|page=35 |url=https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68450539/Whanganui%20River%20Report%201999.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160914150131/https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68450539/Whanganui%20River%20Report%201999.pdf |archive-date=2016-09-14 |url-status=live|access-date=31 December 2016}}</ref> [[Hemopereki Simon]], from [[Ngāti Tūwharetoa]], asserts that there are many forms of ''mana'' in Maori beliefs.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal|url=https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/te-kaharoa/index.php/tekaharoa/article/view/6/4 |title=View of Te Arewhana Kei Roto i Te Rūma: An Indigenous Neo-Disputatio on Settler Society, Nullifying Te Tiriti, 'Natural Resources' and Our Collective Future in New Zealand|journal=Te Kaharoa|date=2 February 2016 |volume=9|issue=1 |doi=10.24135/tekaharoa.v9i1.6|access-date=11 October 2018|doi-access=free}}</ref> The indigenous word reflects a non-Western view of reality, complicating translation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.waitangi-tribunal.govt.nz/reports/viewchapter.asp?reportID=469d396b-ce85-4e30-b04f-a39dc8d03f38&chapter=36 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071020102335/http://www.waitangi-tribunal.govt.nz/reports/viewchapter.asp?reportID=469D396B-CE85-4E30-B04F-A39DC8D03F38&chapter=36 |url-status=dead |archive-date=20 October 2007 |title=WaitangiThe TribunalNgāi Tahu Sea Fisheries Report 1992 |publisher=Waitangi Tribunal |access-date=26 January 2015}}</ref> This is confirmed by the definition of ''mana'' provided by [[MaoriMāori Marsden]] who states that ''mana'' is:<blockquote>Spiritual power and authority as opposed to the purely psychic and natural force — ihi.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Te Ao Hurihuri: The World Moves|last=Marsden|first=Māori|publisher=Hicks Smith|year=1975|editor-last=King|editor-first=Micheal|location=Wellington|page=145|chapter=God, Man, and the Universe}}</ref></blockquote>According to [[Margaret Mutu]], ''mana'' in its traditional sense means:<blockquote>Power, authority, ownership, status, influence, dignity, respect derived from the [[atua]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=State of Māori Rights|last=Mutu|first=Margaret|publisher=Huia|year=2011|location=Wellington|page=213}}</ref><ref name=":0" /></blockquote>In terms of leadership, [[Ngāti Kahungunu]] legal scholar Dr. Carwyn Jones comments: "Mana is the central concept that underlies Māori leadership and accountability." He also considers ''mana'' as a fundamental aspect of the [[Māori politics#Māori and colonial politics|constitutional traditions of Māori society]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jones|first=Carwyn|date=2014|title=A Māori Constitutional Tradition|url=https://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/centres/nzcpl/publications/nz-journal-of-public-and-international-law/previous-issues/volume-121,-september-2014/Jones.pdf|journal=New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law|volume=11:3|pages=187–204}}</ref>
 
<blockquote>Spiritual power and authority as opposed to the purely psychic and natural force — ihi.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Te Ao Hurihuri: The World Moves |last=Marsden|first=Māori|publisher=Hicks Smith|year=1975|editor-last=King|editor-first=Michael |location=Wellington|page=145 |chapter=God, Man, and the Universe}}</ref></blockquote>
According to the [[New Zealand Ministry of Justice]]:
{{blockquote|Mana and [[Tapu (Polynesian culture)|tapu]] are concepts which have both been attributed single-worded definitions by contemporary writers. As concepts, especially Maori concepts they can not easily be translated into a single English definition. Both mana and tapu take on a whole range of related meanings depending on their association and the context in which they are being used.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/h/he-hinatore-ki-te-ao-maori-a-glimpse-into-the-maori-world/part-1-traditional-maori-concepts/mana-and-tapu |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100522222543/http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/h/he-hinatore-ki-te-ao-maori-a-glimpse-into-the-maori-world/part-1-traditional-maori-concepts/mana-and-tapu |url-status=dead |archive-date=2010-05-22 |title=Mana and Tapu |publisher=Ministry of Justice, New Zealand |access-date=2015-01-26}}</ref>}}
 
According to [[Margaret Mutu]], ''mana'' in its traditional sense means:
===={{anchor|General English usage}}General English usage====
In contemporary [[New Zealand English]], the word "mana" refers to a person or organization of people of great personal prestige and character.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newzealandatoz.com/index.php?pageid=357 |title=Kiwi (NZ) to English Dictionary |publisher=New Zealand A to Z |access-date=26 January 2015}}</ref> The increased use of the term ''mana'' in New Zealand society is the result of the politicization of Māori issues stemming from the [[Māori Renaissance]].
 
<blockquote>Power, authority, ownership, status, influence, dignity, respect derived from the [[atua]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=State of Māori Rights|last=Mutu|first=Margaret|publisher=Huia|year=2011|location=Wellington|page=213}}</ref><ref name=":0" /></blockquote>
=={{anchor|The academic study of mana}}Academic study==
[[File:StateLibQld 1 116272 Southern Cross (ship).jpg|thumb|275px|alt=Photo of a three-masted schooner|The 1891 ''[[Southern Cross (1891 Melanesian Mission ship)|Southern Cross]]'', one of the ships at [[Norfolk Island]]'s [[Melanesian Mission]] where Codrington taught and worked]]
 
In terms of leadership, [[Ngāti Kahungunu]] legal scholar Carwyn Jones comments: "Mana is the central concept that underlies Māori leadership and accountability." He also considers ''mana'' as a fundamental aspect of the [[Māori politics#Māori and colonial politics|constitutional traditions of Māori society]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jones|first=Carwyn|date=2014|title=A Māori Constitutional Tradition |url=https://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/centres/nzcpl/publications/nz-journal-of-public-and-international-law/previous-issues/volume-121,-september-2014/Jones.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180222085535/https://www.victoria.ac.nz/law/centres/nzcpl/publications/nz-journal-of-public-and-international-law/previous-issues/volume-121,-september-2014/Jones.pdf |archive-date=2018-02-22 |url-status=live|journal=New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law|volume=11|issue=3 |pages=187–204}}</ref>
Missionary [[Robert Henry Codrington]] traveled widely in [[Melanesia]], publishing several studies of its language and culture. His 1891 book ''The Melanesians: Studies in their Anthropology and Folk-Lore'' contains the first detailed description of ''mana'' in English.<ref name="Blust" /> Codrington defines it as "a force altogether distinct from physical power, which acts in all kinds of ways for good and evil, and which it is of the greatest advantage to possess or control".<ref name="Codrington">{{cite book|last1=Codrington|first1=Robert Henry|title=The Melanesians: Studies in Their Anthropology and Folk-lore|date=1891|publisher=Clarendon Press|location=New York|isbn=9780486202587|page=118|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xiMHAQAAIAAJ&q=The+Melanesians:+Studies+in+Their+Anthropology+and+Folklore.|language=en}}</ref>
 
According to the [[New Zealand Ministry of Justice]]:
His era had already defined [[animism]], the concept that the energy (or life) in an object derives from a spiritual component. [[Georg Ernst Stahl]]'s 18th-century animism was adopted by [[Edward Burnett Tylor]], the founder of [[cultural anthropology]], who presented his initial ideas about the history of religion in his 1865 ''Researches into the Early History of Mankind''<ref name="Tylor">{{cite book|last1=Tylor|first1=Edward B.|title=Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom|date=2010|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge, England|isbn=978-1108017510}}</ref>{{rp|vi}} and developed them in volumes one (1871) and two (1874) of ''Primitive Culture''.<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|1}}
 
{{blockquote|Mana and [[Tapu (Polynesian culture)|tapu]] are concepts which have both been attributed single-worded definitions by contemporary writers. As concepts, especially Maori concepts they can not easily be translated into a single English definition. Both mana and tapu take on a whole range of related meanings depending on their association and the context in which they are being used.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/h/he-hinatore-ki-te-ao-maori-a-glimpse-into-the-maori-world/part-1-traditional-maori-concepts/mana-and-tapu |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100522222543/http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/h/he-hinatore-ki-te-ao-maori-a-glimpse-into-the-maori-world/part-1-traditional-maori-concepts/mana-and-tapu |url-status=dead |archive-date=2010-05-22 |title=Mana and Tapu |publisher=Ministry of Justice, New Zealand |access-date=2015-01-26}}</ref>}}
===Tylor's cultural evolution===
In Tylor's [[cultural anthropology]], other [[primates]] did not appear to possess culture.<ref group="note"> The argument that primates and other [[higher animals|high mammals]] [[animal culture|have some culture]], as defined by the practical knowledge taught by parents who learned it from their parents, does not substantially affect the argument, since humanity's characteristically complex learned behaviour is unique.</ref>
 
A tribe with ''mana whenua'' must have demonstrated their authority over a territory.
Tylor did not try to find evidence of a non-cultural human state because he considered it unreachable, "a condition not far removed from that of the lower animals" and "savage life as in some sort representing an early known state."<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|33}} He described such a hypothetical state as "the human savage naked in both mind and body, and destitute of laws, or arts, or ideas, and almost of language".<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|30}} According to Tylor, speculation about an acultural state is impossible. Using the method of [[Comparative cultural studies|comparative culture]], similar to [[comparative anatomy]] and the [[Comparative method (linguistics)|comparative method of historical linguistics]] and following [[John Lubbock, 1st Baron Avebury|John Lubbock]], he drew up a dual classification of cultural traits ([[meme]]s and [[memeplex]]es). His categories were "savage" and "civilised". Tylor wrote, "From an ideal point of view, civilization may be looked upon as the general improvement of mankind by higher organization of the individual and of society ... "<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|24}} and identified his model with the "progression-theory of civilization".<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|81}}
 
===={{anchor|General English usage}}General English usage====
===Evolution of religion===
In contemporary [[New Zealand English]], the word "mana" refers to a person or organizationorganisation of people of great personal prestige and character.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newzealandatoz.com/index.php?pageid=357 |title=Kiwi (NZ) to English Dictionary |publisher=New Zealand A to Z |access-date=26 January 2015}}</ref> The increased use of the term ''mana'' in New Zealand society is the result of the politicizationpoliticisation of Māori issues stemming from the [[Māori Renaissance]].{{cn|date=May 2023}}
Tylor cited a "minimum definition" of religion as "the belief in Spiritual Beings".<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|383}} Noting that no savage societies lack religion and that the initial state of a religious man is beyond reach, he enumerated two stages in the evolution of religion: a simple belief in individual [[animae]] (or Doctrine of Souls) and the elaboration of [[dogma]]. The dogmas are systems of higher spirits commanding phases of nature. In volume two of ''Primitive Culture'', Tylor called this stage the Doctrine of Spirits.<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|108–110}} He used the word "animism" in two different senses.<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|385}} The first is religion itself: a belief in the spiritual as an effective energy, shared by every specific religion. In his progression theory, an undogmatic version preceded rational theological systems. Animism is the simple [[Theory of the Soul]], which [[comparative religion]] attempts to reconstruct.
 
=={{anchor|The academic study of mana}}Academic study==
Tylor's work predated Codrington's, and he was unfamiliar with the latter. The concept of ''mana'' occasioned a revision of Tylor's view of the evolution of religion. The first anthropologist to formulate a revision (which he called "pre-animistic religion") was [[Robert Ranulph Marett]], in a series of papers collected and published as ''Threshold of Religion''. In its preface he takes credit for the adjective "[[Urreligion|pre-animistic]]" but not the noun "[[Urreligion|pre-animism]]", although he does not attribute it.<ref name="Marett">{{cite book|last1=Marett|first1=Robert Randolph|title=Threshold of Religion|date=2013|publisher=Hardpress Ltd|isbn=978-1313151962}}</ref>{{rp|xxi}}
[[File:StateLibQld 1 116272 Southern Cross (ship).jpg|thumb|275px|alt=Photo of a three-masted schooner|The 1891 ''[[Southern Cross (1891 Melanesian Mission ship)|Southern Cross]]'', one of the ships at [[Norfolk Island]]'s [[Melanesian Mission]] where Codrington taught and worked]]
 
Missionary [[Robert Henry Codrington]] traveled widely in [[Melanesia]], publishing several studies of its language and culture. His 1891 book ''The Melanesians: Studies in their Anthropology and Folk-Lore'' contains the first detailed description of ''mana'' in English.<ref name="Blust" /> Codrington defines it as "a force altogether distinct from physical power, which acts in all kinds of ways for good and evil, and which it is of the greatest advantage to possess or control".<ref name="Codrington">{{cite book|last1=Codrington|first1=Robert Henry|title=The Melanesians: Studies in Their Anthropology and Folk-lore|date=1891|publisher=Clarendon Press|location=New York|isbn=9780486202587|page=118|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xiMHAQAAIAAJ&q=The+Melanesians:+Studies+in+Their+Anthropology+and+Folklore.|language=en}}</ref>
According to Marett, "Animism will not suffice as a minimum definition of religion." Tylor had used the term "[[natural religion]]",<ref name="Tylor"/>{{rp|386}} consistent with Georg Ernst Stahl's concept of a natural spiritual energy. The soul of an animal, for example, is its vital principle. Marett wrote that "one must dig deeper" to find the "roots of religion".{{citation needed|date=September 2017}}
 
==={{anchor|Pre-animistic phase of religion}}Pre-animism===
Describing pre-animism, [[Robert Ranulph Marett]] cited the Melanesian ''mana'' (primarily with Codrington's work): "When the science of Comparative Religion employs a native expression such as mana, it is obliged to disregard to some extent its original or local meaning. Science, then, may adopt mana as a general category ... ".<ref name="Marett">{{cite book |last1=Marett |first1=Robert Randolph |title=Threshold of Religion |date=2013 |publisher=Hardpress Ltd |isbn=978-1-313-15196-2}}</ref>{{rp|99}} In Melanesia the ''[[animae]]'' are the souls of living men, the ghosts of deceased men, and spirits "of ghost-like appearance" or imitating living people. Spirits can inhabit other objects, such as animals or stones.<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|115–120}}
 
The most significant property of ''mana'' is that it is distinct from, and exists independently of, its source. ''Animae'' act only through ''mana''. It is impersonal, undistinguished, and (like energy) transmissible between objects, which can have more or less of it. ''Mana'' is perceptible, appearing as a "Power of awfulness" (in the sense of awe or wonder).<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|12–13}} Objects possessing it impress an observer with "respect, veneration, propitiation, service" emanating from the ''mana's'' power. Marett lists a number of objects habitually possessing ''mana'': "startling manifestations of nature", "curious stones", animals, "human remains", blood,<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|2}} thunderstorms, eclipses, eruptions, glaciers, and the sound of a [[bullroarer]].<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|14–17}}
 
If ''mana'' is a distinct power, it may be treated distinctly. Marett distinguishes [[Spell (paranormal)incantation|spellsspell]]s, which treat ''mana'' quasi-objectively, and [[prayer]]s (which address the ''anima''). An ''anima'' may have departed, leaving ''mana'' in the form of a spell which can be addressed by [[Magic (paranormalsupernatural)|magic]]. Although Marett postulates [[Urreligion|an earlier pre-animistic phase]], a "rudimentary religion" or "[[magico-religious]]" phase in which the ''mana'' figures without ''animae'', "no island of pure 'pre-animism' is to be found."<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|xxvi}} Like Tylor, he theorizes a thread of commonality between animism and pre-animism identified with the [[supernatural]]—the "mysterious", as opposed to the reasonable.<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|22}}
 
===Durkheim's totemism===
 
In 1912, French sociologist [[Émile Durkheim]] examined [[totemism (Durkheim)|totemism]], the religion of the Aboriginal Australians, from a sociological and theological point of view, describing [[collective effervescence]] as originating in the idea of the totemic principle or ''Mana''.{{cn|date=May 2023}}
 
==={{anchor|Criticisms}}Criticism===
In 1936, [[Ian Hogbin]] criticised the universality of Marett's pre-animism: "Mana is by no means universal and, consequently, to adopt it as a basis on which to build up a general theory of primitive religion is not only erroneous but indeed fallacious".<ref name="Mana">{{cite journal|last1=Hogbin|first1=H. Ian|title=MANAMana |journal=Oceania|date=March 1936|volume=6|issue=3|pages=241–274|doi=10.1002/j.1834-4461.1936.tb00187.x}}</ref> However, Marett intended the concept as an [[abstraction]].<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|99}} Spells, for example, may be found "from Central Australia to Scotland."<ref name="Marett"/>{{rp|55}}
 
Early 20th-century scholars also saw ''mana'' as a universal concept, found in all human cultures and expressing fundamental human awareness of a sacred life energy. In his 1904 essay, "Outline of a General Theory of Magic", [[Marcel Mauss]] drew on the writings of Codrington and others to paint a picture of ''mana'' as "power ''[[wikt:par excellence|par excellence]]'', the genuine effectiveness of things which corroborates their practical actions without annihilating them".<ref name="Mauss">{{cite book|last1=Mauss|first1=Marcel|title=A General Theory of Magic|date=2007|publisher=Routledge|location=London|isbn=9780415253963978-0-415-25396-3|edition=Reprint}}</ref>{{rp|111}} Mauss pointed out the similarity of ''mana'' to the [[Iroquois]] [[orenda]] and the [[Algonquian peoples|Algonquian]] [[manitou]], convinced of the "universality of the institution";<ref name="Mauss"/>{{rp|116}} "a concept, encompassing the idea of magical power, was once found everywhere".<ref name="Mauss"/>{{rp|117}}
 
Mauss and his collaborator, [[Henri Hubert]], were criticised for this position when their 1904 ''Outline of a General Theory of Magic'' was published. "No one questioned the existence of the notion of mana", wrote Mauss's biographer [[Marcel Fournier]], "but Hubert and Mauss were criticized for giving it a universal dimension".<ref name="Fournier">{{cite book|last1=Fournier|first1=Marcel|title=Marcel Mauss: A Biography|date=2006|publisher=Princeton University Press|location=Princeton, New Jersey|isbn=9780691117775978-0-691-11777-5|page=[https://archive.org/details/marcelmaussbiogr0000four/page/138 138]|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/marcelmaussbiogr0000four/page/138}}</ref> Criticism of ''mana'' as an archetype of life energy increased. According to [[Mircea Eliade]], the idea of ''mana'' is not universal; in places where it is believed, not everyone has it, and "even among the varying formulae (''mana'', ''wakan'', ''orenda'', etc.) there are, if not glaring differences, certainly nuances not sufficiently observed in the early studies".<ref name="Eliade">{{cite book|last1=Eliade|first1=Mircea|title=Patterns in Comparative Religion|date=1996|publisher=University of Nebraska Press|location=Lincoln|isbn=9780803267336978-0-8032-6733-6|page=22|edition=2nd}}</ref> "With regard to these theories founded upon the primordial and universal character of ''mana'', we must say without delay that they have been invalidated by later research".<ref name="Eliade2">{{cite book|last1=Eliade|first1=Mircea|title=Myths, Dreams and Mysteries: The Encounter Between Contemporary Faiths and Archaic Realities|date=1992|publisher=Peter Smith|location=Magnolia, Massachusetts|isbn=9780844666259978-0-8446-6625-9|page=127}}</ref>
 
Hoolbrad Holbraad<ref>Holbraad, M. (2007). "The Powerpower of Powderpowder: Multiplicitymultiplicity and Motionmotion in the Divinatorydivinatory Cosmologycosmology of Cuban ifaIfá (or mana again)" In ''Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically'', Henare, A. Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. London: Routledge. pp. 199-235199–235</ref> argued in a paper included in the seminal volume “Thinking"Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically”,Ethnographically" that the concept of mana highlights a significant theoretical assumption in [[Anthropologyanthropology]] : that matter, and meaning are separate. A hotly debated issue, HoolbradHolbraad suggests that mana provides motive to re-evaluate the division assumed between matter and meaning in social research. His work is part of the [[ontological turn]] in Anthropologyanthropology, a [[paradigm]] shift that aims to take seriously the [[ontology]] of other cultures .<ref>Heywood, P. (2017). "[https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn Ontological Turn, The]" in ''The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Anthropology, Available at: https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn''. (Accessed: 7/11/2021)</ref>
 
==See also==
{{columns-list|colwidth=15em|
* ''[[MannaAṣẹ]]''
* ''[[Barakah]]''
* ''[[Chakra]]''
* [[Magic charm|Charm]]
*''[[The Force]]''
* ''[[Guṇa]]''
* [[Kami]] in [[ShintoismShinto]]
* ''[[Manitou]]''
* [[Magic (Paranormal)|Magic]]
* [[ManaMelanesian (Mandaeism)mythology]]
* ''[[Manas (early Buddhism)|Manas]]'' in early Buddhism
* ''[[Manna]]''
* [[Mysticism]]
* [[Occult]]
Line 91 ⟶ 112:
* [[Ritual]]
* [[Scientific skepticism]]
* [[Spell (magic)|Spell]]
* [[Supernatural]]
* [[Taboo]]
* [[Talisman]]
* [[Väki]]
* ''[[Yorishiro]]'' in Shintoism
* [[Wind Horse]]
* ''[[Yorishiro]]'' in ShintoismShinto
}}
 
==Notes==
Line 104 ⟶ 126:
 
==Further reading==
* {{cite book|last1=Codrington|first1=Robert Henry|author-link=Robert Henry Codrington|title=The Melanesians: Studies in Their Anthropology and Folk-lore|date=1891|publisher=Clarendon Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-486-20258-7|page=118|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xiMHAQAAIAAJ&dq=%22The+Melanesians%22+%22Studies+in+Their+Anthropology+and+Folklore%22&pg=PA119|language=en}}
* Keesing, Roger. 1984. "Rethinking mana". ''Journal of Anthropological Research'' 40:137–156.
* {{Cite journal| last = Keesing| first = Roger|author-link=Roger Keesing| title = Rethinking mana| journal = Journal of Anthropological Research| volume = 40| pages = 137–156| date = 1984| issue = 1| doi = 10.1086/jar.40.1.3629696| jstor = 3629696| s2cid = 224832247}}
* [[Claude Lévi-Strauss|Lévi-Strauss, Claude]]; Baker, Felicity (translator). 1987. ''Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss''. {{ISBN|0-415-15158-9}}.
* [[Marcel Mauss|Mauss, Marcel]]. 1924. ''Essai sur le don''.
* Meylan, Nicolas, ''Mana: A History of a Western Category'', Leiden, Brill, 2017.
* {{cite journal|last=Mondragón|first=Carlos|title=Of Winds, Worms and Mana: The Traditionaltraditional Calendarcalendar of the Torres Islands, Vanuatu|journal=Oceania |date=June 2004|volume=74|issue=4|pages=289–308|doi=10.1002/j.1834-4461.2004.tb02856.x|jstor=40332069}}
* van der Grijp, Paul. 2014. ''Manifestations of Mana: Power and Divine Inspiration in the Pacific''. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
 
==External links==
Line 132 ⟶ 155:
[[Category:Society of Samoa]]
[[Category:Spirituality]]
[[Category:TahitianCulture cultureof Tahiti]]
[[Category:Vitalism]]
[[Category:Austronesian spirituality]]
[[Category:Social concepts]]
[[Category:Social status]]
[[Category:Vanuatu mythology]]
[[Category:Culture of Vanuatu]]
[[Category:Words and phrases with no direct English translation]]