Content deleted Content added
→Relations with other families: Attempt 2 Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
I undid this revision again. I checked the reference you provided. It does not even MENTION Mayan languages. It doesn't even have any author attribution. It is utterly irrelevant to the topic of this page and attempts to inject pseudo-scientific fiction into the discussion of Mayan languages. Please stop vandalizing the page. |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 72:
Writing in 1997, [[Lyle Campbell]], an expert in Mayan languages and historical linguistics, argued that the most promising proposal is the "[[Macro-Mayan languages|Macro-Mayan]]" hypothesis, which posits links between Mayan, the [[Mixe–Zoque languages]] and the [[Totonacan languages]], but more research is needed to support or disprove this hypothesis.<ref name="Campbell 1997, p.165"/> In 2015, Campbell noted that recent evidence presented by David Mora-Marin makes the case for a relationship between Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages "much more plausible".{{sfn|Mora-Marín|2016}}{{sfn|Campbell|2015|p=54}}
===Subdivisions===
| |||