(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Tampon tax: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Tampon tax: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)
→‎United States: the Sales taxes in the United States article goes into more depth about taxable goods, and has a table of goods by state, with feminine hygiene products on there. We could link directly to the table come to think of it
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 2:
{{Use American English|date=October 2017}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2017}}
[[File:Feminine Hygiene Products in a Walmart.png|thumb|[[Feminine hygiene]] products are subject to tax in a number of countries.]]
{{Feminism sidebar|state=collapsed}}
 
'''Tampon tax''' (or '''period tax''') is a popular term used to call attention to [[tampons]], and other [[feminine hygiene]] products, being subject to [[value-added tax]] (VAT) or [[sales tax]], unlike the [[tax exemption]] status granted to other products considered basic necessities. Proponents of tax exemption argue that tampons, [[sanitary napkins]], [[menstrual cups]] and comparable products constitute basic, unavoidable necessities for women, and any additional taxes constitute a [[pink tax]].
 
Proponents of tax exemption argue that tampons, [[sanitary napkins]], [[menstrual cups]] and other products which serve the basic menstrual cycle constitute unavoidable necessities for women and should be classified alongside other unavoidable, tax-exempt necessities, such as groceries and personal medical items.<ref name="WaPo: Garcia"/><ref name="USAT: NY"/> The [[BBC]] estimates that women need to use [[feminine hygiene]] products for about a week each month for about 3050 years.<ref name="BBC: international"/> According to the [[American Medical Association]] over 17,000 menstrual hygiene items are needed in a user's lifetime amounting to a cost of around 2,000 dollars.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Why stigma prevents treating menstrual hygiene as essential |url=https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/population-care/why-stigma-prevents-treating-menstrual-hygiene-essential |access-date=2023-05-02 |website=American Medical Association |date=December 16, 2020 |language=en}}</ref> While [[sales tax]] policy varies across jurisdictions, these products were typically taxed at the same rate as non-essential goods, such as in the United States, while other countries, such as the United Kingdom and Ireland, reduced or eliminated their general [[consumption tax]] on sanitary products.<ref name="USAT: NY"/><ref name="BBC: international"/> When asked about equivalent exemptions for men, proponents argue that no male products, [[condoms]] included, are comparable to feminine hygiene products, since menstruation is biological and "[[feminine hygiene]] is not a choice".<ref name="WaPo: Garcia"/> However, others argue that other basic necessities such as [[toilet paper]] are still taxed in many countries, for example in the UK at 20%.<ref name="Robertson2015"/> As the vast majority of consumers of feminine hygiene products are women, the increased cost has been criticized as being discriminatory against women.<ref name="Hinckley Journal of Politics:Public Discourse of Policies Concerning Menstrual Taboo"/> The tampon tax is not a special tax levied directly on feminine hygiene products.<ref name="USAT: NY"/>
 
Since about 2004, many countries have abolished or reduced sales taxes for tampons and pads, including Kenya, Canada, India, Colombia, Australia, Germany, and Rwanda.
Line 16:
Below are examples of countries that have or used to have a tampon tax (ordered by most recent changes to the country's tax system first):
* Belize will eliminate the General Sales Tax on feminine hygiene products on April 1, 2023. They will also no longer be subject to importation duties.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gonzalez |first1=Zoila Palma |title=Belize becomes 2nd country in region to eliminate taxes from women's sanitary products |url=https://www.breakingbelizenews.com/2023/03/04/belize-becomes-2nd-country-in-region-to-eliminate-taxes-from-womens-sanitary-products/ |access-date=5 March 2023 |work=Breaking Belize News |date=4 March 2023}}</ref>
* The tampon tax was abolished in Britain on 1 January 1, 2021, following Britain's departure from the EU, meaning there is now a zero rate of VAT applying to women's sanitary products.<ref name="tampon-tax-abolished">{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/01/01/tampon-tax-abolished-brexit-allows-treasury-scrap-vat-sanitary/|title=Tampon tax abolished as Brexit allows Treasury to scrap VAT on sanitary products|newspaper=The Telegraph|first=Amy|last=Jones|date=1 January 2021|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref name=":8">{{Cite news|date=1 January 2021|title=Activists cheer as 'sexist' tampon tax is scrapped|language=en-gb|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-55502252|first=Mary-Ann|last=Russon}}</ref>
* Rwanda removed their VAT on all sanitary products on 10 December 10, 2019. The change was made in response to school absence and dropouts caused by 18% of Rwandan women and girls being unable to attend school or work due to not being able to afford feminine hygiene products.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/internationaldevelopment/2020/01/17/rwanda-removes-vat-on-sanitary-products-as-the-fight-to-end-period-poverty-continues/|title=Rwanda removes VAT on sanitary products, as the fight to end period poverty continues|last=Isimbi|first=Ynis|date=2020-01-17|website=LSE International Development|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-16}}</ref>
*Australia repealed the 10% tax on tampons and pads on 1 January 1, 2019, after an 18-year campaign, after all states and territories agreed to make sanitary products explicitly exempt from the GST.<ref name="BBC: international" /><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/law/2018/dec/31/australias-new-laws-taking-effect-on-1-january-from-axed-tampon-tax-to-credit-card-changes|title=Australia's new laws taking effect on 1 January: From axed tampon tax to credit card changes|last1=Davidson|first1=Helen|date=December 31, 2018|newspaper=The Guardian}}</ref>
* In Colombia, on 14 November 2018, the Constitutional Court unanimously ruled to strike down a 5 per cent tax on tampons and pads on [[gender equality]] grounds.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/cortes/corte-constitucional-tumba-iva-a-toallas-higienicas-y-tampones-293498|title=Corte Constitucional tumba IVA del 5 % a toallas higiénicas y tampones|work= El Tiempo|date=November 14, 2018|language =es}}</ref>
* India eliminated its 12% tax on feminine hygiene products in 2018.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-44912742|title=India scraps tampon tax after campaign|date=2018-07-21|work=BBC News|access-date=2018-11-20|language=en-GB}}</ref> This was after a year of lobbying by advocacy groups and celebrities.<ref>{{cite web|last=Iyengar |first=Rishi |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/22/health/india-tampon-tax-intl/index.html |title=India scraps controversial tax on sanitary pads - CNN |publisher=Edition.cnn.com |date=2018-07-22 |accessdate=2018-11-08}}</ref> Actor [[Akshay Kumar]] featured as the lead male actor in [[Pad Man (film)|''Pad Man'']] and raised awareness about the taboo on menstruation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/akshay-kumar-change-can-be-implemented-only-once-we-initiate-discussions/articleshow/64300733.cms|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180918013940/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/akshay-kumar-change-can-be-implemented-only-once-we-initiate-discussions/articleshow/64300733.cms|archive-date=18 September 2018|title=Akshay Kumar: Change can be implemented only once we initiate discussions|newspaper=The Times of India|date=24 May 2018|access-date=2 November 2018}}</ref>
* Mauritius eradicated its tampon tax in 2017 following a popular online petition initiated and led by gender consultant and feminist Trisha Gukhool.{{citation needed|date=September 2021}}
* Canada removed its tampon tax in mid-2015 following an online petition signed by thousands.<ref name="WaPo: Garcia"/>
* In 2004, Kenya was the first country to abolish sales tax for [[menstrual hygiene management|menstrual products]].<ref name="Newsweek: Jones"/>
 
=== European Union ===
In 2016, the United Kingdom proposed that member states should be allowed to decide whether to continue to apply VAT to menstrual hygiene products. This led to the introduction of Directive 2022/542/EC. This modified Annex III of Directive 2006/112/EC allowing "pharmaceutical products used for medical and veterinary purposes, including products used for contraception and female sanitary protection, and absorbent hygiene products" to be zero rated.<ref>{{CELEX|32022L0542|text=Council Directive (EU) 2022/542 of 5 April 2022 amending Directives 2006/112/EC and (EU) 2020/285 as regards rates of value added tax}}</ref>
The parliament of the European Union voted in favour of a proposal in March 2016 to allow member states to decide whether to continue to apply VAT to menstrual hygiene products.<ref>{{cite news|title=The EU will finally allow member states to scrap their tampon tax|url=https://qz.com/642811/the-eu-will-finally-allow-member-states-to-scrap-their-tampon-tax|first=Annalisa|last=Merelli|date=19 March 2016|website=Quartz}}</ref> However, legislation allowing this was never brought forward by the EU commission and as such the rules remain unchanged, though some EU countries have made use of their limited number of reduced rate items to decrease taxes on sanitary items in recent years.
 
In the time between the proposal and the legislation, some EU countries made use of their limited number of reduced rate items to decrease taxes on sanitary items.
 
* Ireland levies no value-added tax on tampons, panty liners, and sanitary towels. Ireland is the only EU country to have a zero tax rate on sanitary goods.<ref name=":4" /> The rate predates legislation restricting zero-rating (a [[grandfather clause]]).<ref name="BBC: international"/>
* In Germany, the amount of tax on sanitary items was cut from 19% (the basic rate) to 7% (the reduced rate) as of 1 January 1, 2020.<ref name=":4">{{Cite news|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/08/europe/tampon-tax-germany-luxury-item-grm-intl/|title=Tampons will no longer be taxed as luxury items, after landmark German vote|date=8 November 2019|work=CNN, Nadine Schmidt and Sheena McKenzie|access-date=11 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.dw.com/en/tampon-tax-germany-menstruation/a-51154597|title=Germany scraps 'tampon tax,' as menstrual products not a 'luxury'|date=7 November 2019|work=DW (Deutsche Welle)|access-date=11 November 2019}}</ref> This is said to be a step toward a tax system that does not discriminate against women.<ref name=":4" />
* Other European countries France, Spain, Portugal, and the Netherlands either plan to, or have already, slashed their taxes in recent years.<ref name=":4" />
 
=== United Kingdom ===
There is a zero rate of VAT applyingapplied to most women's sanitary products in the UK.<ref name="tampon-tax-abolished"/><ref name=":8"/> The United Kingdom had levied a [[value-added tax (United Kingdom)|value-added tax]] on sanitary products since it joined the [[European Economic Community]] in 1973. This rate was reduced to 5% specifically for sanitary products in 2000 with lobbying from [[Member of Parliament]] [[Dawn Primarolo]] saying that this reduction was "about fairness, and doing what we can to lower the cost of a necessity."<ref name="theweek: UK News"/> This is the lowest rate possible under the [[European Union]]'s [[European Union value added tax|value added tax law]], which {{as of|2016|lc=y}} does not allow a reduction to zero rates. The only goods that can be zero rated are those with historic zero rates that have been applied continually since before 1991.<ref>{{cite news|title=Reality Check: Does the EU control UK VAT rates?|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36430504|work=BBC News|date=3 June 2016}}</ref> The [[UK Independence Party]] raised the issue in the [[2015 United Kingdom general election|2015 general election]] with promised to withdraw from the European Union and allow the zero rate. Prime Minister [[David Cameron]] commented, when prompted, that the tampon tax campaign was "long-standing" and a complicated issue within the European Union.<ref name="BBC: international"/> In England, one in ten women between 14 and 21 cannot afford menstrual management products.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://plan-uk.org/media-centre/plan-international-uks-research-on-period-poverty-and-stigma|title=Plan International UK's Research on Period Poverty and Stigma|date=December 20, 2017|website=Plan International UK|access-date=May 27, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/one-in-10-young-women-struggle-to-afford-pads-and-tampons-a8008671.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220526/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/one-in-10-young-women-struggle-to-afford-pads-and-tampons-a8008671.html |archive-date=May 26, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Period Poverty: Why One in 10 Young Women Struggle to Afford Pads and Tampons|last=Rowlingson|first=Karen|date=October 21, 2017|website=The Independent|access-date=May 27, 2018}}</ref>
 
[[Laura Coryton]] led a "Stop taxing periods, period" campaign with an online petition to have the European Union remove the value-added tax for sanitary products.<ref name="Coryton"/> Her petition was highlighted by a further protest in London led by Lucy Whitehill, <ref>{{Cite web |title=The Tab |url=https://thetab.com/2015/04/07/cambridge-grad-marches-downing-street-fight-tampon-tax-34766 |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=www.thetab.com|date=April 7, 2015 }}</ref> and a sister march in Bristol headed by the groups, No More Taboo and Period Watch.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Facebook |url=https://www.facebook.com/events/998921250121037/ |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=www.facebook.com}}</ref> The London march on 2 April 2, 2015, garnered support from 2,500 protesters, many wearing bloodied white pants, chanting outside Downing Street.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-04-07 |title=Cambridge grad marches on Downing Street to fight against the Tampon Tax |url=https://thetab.com/2015/04/07/cambridge-grad-marches-downing-street-fight-tampon-tax-34766 |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=The Tab |language=en-GB}}</ref> The slogan '"Tampons not a necessity? Then welcome to the world where we don't wear them'" made the headlines,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023 |title=Grazia |url=https://graziadaily.co.uk/ |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=Grazia |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |lastlast1=Jones |firstfirst1=Daisy |last2=Thomas |first2=Daisy Jones, Photos: Lily Rose |date=2015-04-03 |title=We Went to Yesterday’sYesterday's Tampon Tax March in London |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/nn9jvw/we-went-to-yesterdays-tampon-tax-march-on-downing-street |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=Vice |language=en}}</ref> with [[Russell Howard]] focusing on the viral placard, '"The Taxman can suck my cl*t",<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-11-07 |title=Russell Howard just nailed why the tampon tax is so ridiculous |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/russell-howard-just-nailed-why-the-tampon-tax-is-so-ridiculous-a6725331.html |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=Why cutting tax credits and taxing tampons is bullshit {{!}} Why cutting tax credits and taxing tampons is bullshit {{!}} By Russell Howard {{!}} Facebook |url=https://www.facebook.com/OfficialRussellHoward/videos/why-cutting-tax-credits-and-taxing-tampons-is-bullshit/10153159257103344/ |access-date=2023-11-14 |language=en}}</ref>', [[Ed Miliband|Ed Milliband]] called the tax ridiculous<ref>{{Cite journal |lastlast1=Flinders |firstfirst1=Matthew |last2=Lowery |first2=Gary |date=2023-04-03 |title=Period politics and policy change: the taxation of menstrual products in the United Kingdom, 1996–2021 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13619462.2023.2184804 |journal=Contemporary British History |language=en |volume=37 |issue=2 |pages=238–265 |doi=10.1080/13619462.2023.2184804 |issn=1361-9462|doi-access=free }}</ref> and [[Caroline Criado Perez]] demanded the tax to be abolished.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-04-28 |title=If I were Prime Minister: I'd introduce abortion on demand and abolish |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/if-i-were-prime-mininster-i-would-legislate-for-abortion-on-demand-and-abolish-vat-on-sanitary-products-10206740.html |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref> Following the protest the [[University of Sheffield]] were the first to cull the tax in their university shops.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-05-05 |title=The SU has scrapped tampon tax |url=https://thetab.com/uk/sheffield/2015/05/05/su-scrapped-tampon-tax-7196 |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=University of Sheffield |language=en-GB}}</ref> In November 2015 Charlie Edge and Ruth Howarth free-bled in front of Parliament to further drive awareness.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-11-10 |title=Does our period blood protest make you feel uncomfortable? That's the point |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/we-protested-outside-parliament-while-bleeding-without-tampons-because-a6728456.html |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Women Protesting the UK's Tampon Tax by Free-Bleeding in Front of Parliament |url=https://people.com/health/women-protesting-the-uks-tampon-tax-by-free-bleeding-in-front-of-parliament/ |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=Peoplemag |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-11-09 |title=These women free-bled outside the Houses of Parliament to protest the tampon tax |url=https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/news/a39564/these-women-free-bled-outside-the-houses-of-parliament-to-protest-the-tampon-tax/ |access-date=2023-11-14 |website=Cosmopolitan |language=en-GB}}</ref> [[George Osborne]] mentioned the petition by name in his 2015 [[Autumn Statement]] pledge to end the tampon tax at the European Union level. The petition platform's CEO cited the campaign as an example of successful [[clicktivism]],<ref name="Clicktivism"/> with over 320,000 signatures.<ref name="BBC: wiki"/><ref name="Ind_student"/> In March 2016, Parliament created legislation to eliminate the tampon VAT, following a budget amendment by opposition Labour MP [[Paula Sherriff]].<ref name=":7">{{Cite news|last=Collinson|first=Patrick|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/mar/06/budget-2020-chancellor-plans-to-finally-end-tampon-tax|title=Budget 2020: chancellor plans to finally end tampon tax|date=2020-03-06|work=The Guardian|access-date=2020-03-07|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref name="BBC: wiki"/><ref name="Ind_Cameron"/> It was expected to go into effect by April 2018 but did not do so; several British women protested for it publicly while displaying blood stains from their periods.<ref name="WaPo: Garcia"/> On 3 October 3, 2018, new EU VAT rules were put forward by the European Parliament which willto allow EU countries to stop taxing sanitary products, but these willdid not come into effect until 2022.<ref>{{cite news|title=Germany scraps 'tampon tax,' as menstrual products not a 'luxury'|url=https://www.dw.com/en/tampon-tax-germany-menstruation/a-51154597|website=Deutsche Welle|date=7 November 2019|quote=Starting in 2022, the 5% threshold will be eliminated, and then all EU members could get rid of the tampon tax completely.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/01/18/eu-rules-forcing-britain-keep-tampon-tax-will-apply-years-brexit/|title=EU rules forcing Britain to keep tampon tax will apply for years after Brexit|last=Crisp|first=James|date=2018|work=The Telegraph|access-date=2018-09-28|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235|url-access=subscription}}</ref> The [[Brexit|UK left the EU]] in January 2020, and following the end of the transition period (at the beginning of 2021) the tampon tax was abolished in the UK, meaning there is now a zero rate of VAT applying to women's sanitary products.<ref name="tampon-tax-abolished"/><ref name=":8"/> Research published by [[Tax Policy Associates]] in November 2022 suggested that savings resulting from the abolition of the tax had been retained by retailers, rather than passed onto women.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/nov/10/uk-retailers-not-passing-on-tampon-tax-savings-to-women-report-says|title=UK retailers not passing on tampon tax savings to women, report says|date=2022-10-11|work=The Guardian|access-date=2022-10-11|language=en-GB}}</ref> {{As[[Period of|2023}},underwear]] campaignersremained are attemptingsubject to getthe reusabletax [[perioduntil underwear]]2024<ref>{{cite zeronews|title=Period ratedpants forcould get cheaper after VAT purposesis removed|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67855869|website=BBC TheNews|date=1 garmentsJanuary are2024}}</ref> subjectand towas VATincluded despitein reusablethe menstrualexemption cupsafter beingcampaigners zeroraised ratedthe issue.<ref>{{cite news|title=John Lewis and Waitrose join drive to make reusable period products cheaper|url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/aug/26/john-lewis-waitrose-join-drive-make-reusable-period-products-cheaper|newspaper=The Guardian|first=Clea|last=Skopeliti|date=26 August 2023}}</ref>
 
====Scotland====
Line 42 ⟶ 44:
A study by the WHO and UNICEF showed that one out of five women in Scotland have been forced to improvise with items including toilet paper and old clothes because of the high cost of commercial products.
 
The [[Scottish Government|Scottish government]] in 2019 began providing free sanitary products for poorer students at schools, with hopes that this would be rolled out across the entire nation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/24/scotland-to-offer-free-sanitary-products-to-all-students-in-world-first|title=Scotland to offer free sanitary products to all students in world first|last=Khomami|first=Nadia|date=2018-08-24|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-04-27|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/mar/09/period-poverty-english-schools-philip-hammond|title=Hammond to promise funds to end period poverty in English schools|last=Stewart|first=Heather|date=2019-03-09|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-04-27|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>
 
A bill to make period products available for free to everyone who needs them received preliminary approval in the Scottish Parliament in February 2020<ref>{{Cite news|title=Scotland Poised To Become 1st Country To Make Period Products Free|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/02/27/809990550/scotland-poised-to-become-1st-country-to-make-period-products-free|access-date=2021-01-01|website=npr.org|date=February 27, 2020|language=en|last1=Wamsley|first1=Laurel}}</ref> and Members for the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) approved [[The Period Products (Free Provision) (Scotland) Act]] on Tuesday 24 November 2020. Local authorities in Scotland now have a legal duty to ensure that tampons and sanitary pads are available freely to "anyone who needs them". The bill was introduced by Labour MSP [[Monica Lennon]] who began campaigning to end period poverty in 2016. She stated that "Periods don't stop for pandemics and the work to improve access to essential tampons, pads and reusables has never been more important".<ref>{{Cite news|date=2020-11-24|title=Period poverty: Scotland first in world to make period products free|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-51629880|access-date=2021-01-01}}</ref><ref name=":8" /> The measure requires the provision of free period products in schools, colleges, and universities, as well as football clubs, restaurants, pubs, and public concert halls.<ref name="yourperiodcalled.com">{{cite web |last1=Forrest |first1=Jennifer |title=Scotland: First Country to Provide Free Menstrual Products to All|url=https://yourperiodcalled.com/2020/11/25/scotland-first-nation-to-provide-free-menstrual-products-to-all/|website=Your Period Called |access-date=10 January 2021}}</ref>
Line 54 ⟶ 56:
{{Legend|#377EB8|Tampons not taxed|outline=#377EB8}}
{{Legend|#D3D3D3|No state sales tax|outline=#D3D3D3}}]]
{{See also|Sales taxes in the United States}}
 
Menstrual hygiene products are considered by many states within the United States as "tangible individual property" resulting in additional sales tax. This additional tax increases the overall price and further limits accessibility to menstrual hygiene products to lower-income women. These products are classified as medical devices but are not eligible for purchase through government funded assistance programs.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Rozema|first1=Kyle|last2=Cotropia|first2=Christopher Anthony|date=2018-03-29|title=Who Benefits from Repealing Tampon Taxes? Empirical Evidence from New Jersey|journal=Journal of Empirical Legal Studies|language=en|location=Rochester, NY|volume=15|issue=3|pages=620–647|doi=10.1111/jels.12188|ssrn=3233238|s2cid=158145756}}</ref>
 
In the United States, almost all states tax "tangible individual property" but exempt non-luxury "necessities": groceries, [[medical prescription|prescriptions]], [[prosthetics]], agriculture supplies, and sometimes clothes—the exemptions vary between states.<ref name="WaPo: Garcia"/> Most states charge sales tax for women's pads and tampons.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/04/18/scotland-end-period-poverty-tampon-tax/502020002/|title=Women get their periods every month – and it's incredibly expensive|work=USA TODAY|access-date=2018-10-15|language=en}}</ref> Five states do not have a state sales tax (Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon), and {{As of|2019|6|lc=yes|df=}}, thirteen US states specifically exempted essential hygiene products: Utah,<ref name="auto1">{{Cite web | url=https://www.newsweek.com/even-utah-ending-discriminatory-tampon-tax-whos-next-opinion-1477143 |title = Even Utah is ending the discriminatory tampon tax. Who's next? &#124; Opinion|website = [[Newsweek]]|date = 2019-12-13}}</ref> Ohio,<ref name=Fox19>{{Cite news | url=https://www.fox19.com/2019/11/07/ohios-tampon-tax-is-no-more/ | title=Ohio's 'tampon tax' is no more | website=Fox 19 Now | date=7 November 2019 | agency=Associated Press }}</ref> California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island.<ref name="WaPo: Garcia"/><ref name="USAT: NY"/><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://splinternews.com/these-are-the-u-s-states-that-tax-women-for-having-per-1793848102|title=These are the U.S. states that tax women for having periods|last=Hillin|first=Taryn|work=Splinter|access-date=2017-12-15|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.ktnv.com/news/national/democracy-2018/election-results-2018-nevada-ballot-questions-1-6|title=Election Results 2018: Nevada Ballot Questions 1–6|work=KNTV|access-date=2018-11-07|language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/us/tampon-tax.html|title=22 States Considered Eliminating the 'Tampon Tax' This Year. Here's What Happened.|last=Zraick|first=Karen|date=2019-07-12|work=The New York Times|access-date=2019-07-21|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> California repealed the tax in its 2019 state budget, but only for the two-year duration of the budget. Seven other states have introduced such legislation, most recently Nebraska, Virginia, and Arizona.{{citation needed|date=November 2019}} In November 2021, Michigan ended its tampon tax.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Whitmer - Gov. Whitmer Signs First Bill Repealing Tampon Tax, Drives Down Costs for Families|url=https://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/0,9309,7-387-90499-571973--,00.html|access-date=2021-12-29|website=www.michigan.gov}}</ref>
 
Many federal assistance programs such as [[Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program|SNAP]] (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and [[WIC program|WIC]] (Women, Infants and Children) do not allow the use of those funds for products such as pads or tampons despite the products' classification as medical devices. The IRS does not classify female products as medical devices, thus blocking women from buying them with pre-tax dollars in both flexible spending accounts and health savings accounts.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/education/2018/08/14/lack-feminine-hygiene-products-keeps-girls-out-school/948313002/|title=Teen girls are missing school because they don't have access to feminine hygiene products|work=The Tennessean|access-date=2018-11-02|language=en}}</ref>
 
Recently, there is a movement to ensure access to the basic necessity of menstrual products for women.
Line 70 ⟶ 72:
 
==== California ====
California Assemblywoman [[Cristina Garcia (politician)|Cristina Garcia]] reported that California women each pay roughly [[US$]]7 per month over 40 years, constituting US$20 &nbsp;million in annual taxes. Garcia and [[Ling Ling Chang]] proposed a bill to remove the tampon tax in early 2016. At this time, only a handful of the country's states exempted tampons, and several others had no state sales tax. Garcia held that women were taxed "for being women" and bore an economic burden for having no other choice but to buy these products. Garcia and Chang added that the tax was "regulatory discrimination" that disproportionately affected poor women and women of color, and that it likely persisted due to [[taboo|social taboos]] against discussing menstruation.<ref name="WaPo: Garcia"/> Both houses of the [[California State Legislature]] voted to exempt tampons from taxation in June 2016,<ref name="USAT: NY"/> but the bill was vetoed by the state's governor, [[Jerry Brown]], three months later.<ref name="Reuters: Cali veto"/>
 
California Governor Jerry Brown vetoed AB-1561 due to the potential loss of money in taxing feminine hygiene products. In response, Cristina Garcia co-authored AB-0479: Common Cents Tax Reform Act with Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, which is a new measure outlining a solution to offset the feminine product and diaper tax exemption by increasing the tax on hard liquor. This bill was ultimately gutted and amended with provisions on workers' compensation.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/03/13/theres-no-happy-hour-for-menstruation-tax-liquor-instead-of-tampons-lawmakers-say/|title='There's no happy hour for menstruation': Tax liquor instead of tampons, lawmakers say|last=Phillips|first=Kristine|date=March 13, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref>
Line 85 ⟶ 87:
 
==== New York ====
In July 2016, New York State exempted feminine hygiene products from taxation, reducing the state's tax revenue by an estimated US$10 &nbsp;million annually.<ref name="USAT: NY" /> In the court case of the "Tampon Tax", attorney Zoe Salzman defended the movement of repealing the taxes on feminine menstrual products.<ref name="Crawford">{{Cite web|url=http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2016/07/interview-zoe-salzman-new-york-attorney-challenging-tampon-tax/|title=Interview with Zoe Salzman, New York Attorney Challenging the 'Tampon Tax'|last=Crawford|first=Bridget|date=2016-07-28|website=Feminist Law Professors|language=en-US|access-date=2019-04-03}}</ref> Part of the case was also a plea for refunding the women for all of the taxes that they had to pay on feminine menstrual products in the past.<ref name="Crawford"/> Ultimately the case ruled to repeal the taxes on feminine menstrual products, but not to refund the women of New York the previous taxes. Connecticut and Illinois also removed their tax in 2016, with Florida following suit in 2017.<ref name="BBC_Why" /><ref name="Huff_Florida" />
 
==== New Jersey ====
Line 94 ⟶ 96:
 
==== Michigan ====
On November 5, 2021, Michigan Governor [[Gretchen Whitmer]] signed into law bill SB 153<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/0,9309,7-387-90499_90640-572045--,00.html#:~:text=%2D%20Today%2C%20Governor%20Gretchen%20Whitmer%20signed,the%20course%20of%20a%20lifetime. |title = Gov. Whitmer Signs Second Bill Repealing Tampon Tax, Drives Down Costs for Families |date = 2021-11-05}}</ref> repealing the tax on feminine hygiene products. The bill went into effect 90 days later on February 3, 2022.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.wzzm13.com/article/news/local/michigan/tampon-tax-bill-in-effect/69-11b7bcbf-48a6-4176-8d11-4e35ea766e8f |title = 'Tampon tax' in Michigan ends Thursday |date = 2022-02-03}}</ref>
 
====Other states====
Many states that have tampon taxes have tried to repeal or eliminate the tax via legislation and have been denied. US states such as Tennessee, Arizona, and Virginia have introduced legislation.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal|last=Durkin|first=Abigail|date=Spring 2017|title=Profitable Menstruation: How the Cost of Feminine Hygiene Products is a Battle against Reproductive Justice|url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/grggenl18&i=135|journal=Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law|volume=18|pages=131–172|via=EBSCO Academic Search Complete}}</ref><ref name=":12">{{Cite journal|last=Bennett|first=Jennifer|date=Spring 2017|title=The Tampon Tax: Sales Tax, Menstrual Hygiene Products, and Necessity Exemptions|url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/betr1&i=191|journal=Business, Entrepreneurship & Tax Law Review|volume=1|pages=183–215|via=EBSCO Academic Search Complete}}</ref> In Utah, Representative [[Susan Duckworth]] introduced a bill that would have exempted menstrual hygiene products from sales tax, titled "Hygiene Tax Act".<ref name=":02" /> Products exempted included such items as tampons and disposable diapers.<ref name=":02" /> Legal scholars point out that when the bill was sent to the Utah taxation committee to be voted on, eight of the eleven men voted against the bill.<ref name=":02" /> In November 2019, during a “special legislative session” and a Governor's signature, Utah became the thirteenth US state to abolish the tampon tax., Effectiveeffective from January 1, 2020.<ref name="auto1"/>
 
In November 2019, Ohio became the 12th US state to repeal the pink or tampon tax.<ref name=Fox19/> Both Representatives [[Greta Johnson]] and [[Brigid Kelly]] introduced the bills for years and finally became law in November 2019 – that would exempt feminine menstrual products from the state's sales tax.<ref name=":02" /> Legal scholars note that Ohio women still have to pay around four million dollars each year due to taxes on these items as they are not exempt from local taxes.<ref name=":02" />
Line 122 ⟶ 124:
In China, menstrual products are subject to a 13% sales tax, the same as for most consumer items.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://supchina.com/2020/08/28/online-campaign-for-cheaper-menstrual-products-emerges-in-china/|title= Online campaign for cheaper menstrual products emerges in China|work=SupChina|date=August 27, 2020}}</ref>
 
=== India ===
=== Indian Population and Menstruation ===
With a population of 355 &nbsp;million, India has approximately 88% of women who are unable to acquire safe menstrual products because of a lack of capital access. The menstrual products are not thought to be essential, therefore overpriced, and out of reach for over 70% of Indian women who menstruate.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Garg |first=Suneela |date=April 2015 |title=Menstruation related myths in India: strategies for combating it |journal= Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care|volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=184–186 |doi=10.4103/2249-4863.154627 |pmid=25949964 |pmc=4408698 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
 
== Activism ==
Line 130 ⟶ 132:
Free the Tampon, an advocate for free menstrual products estimates that it would cost less than $5 a year per user to provide tampons and pads in restrooms at schools and businesses.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/21/new-york-city-bill-to-call-for-free-tampons-in-public-restrooms-shelters-and-jails/|title=New York City Bill to Call for Free Tampons in Public School Restrooms, Shelters and Jails|last=Rabin|first=Roni Caryn|work=Well|date=March 21, 2016 |access-date=2018-11-18|language=en}}</ref>
 
Activists with [https://www.shethinx.com/pages/thinx-menstrual-equity United for Access] organized a petition and march<ref>{{cite news|title=Activists call on Education Department to take action for ‘menstrual'menstrual equity’equity'|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/activists-call-on-education-department-to-take-action-for-menstrual-equity/2019/01/28/815c6d08-2349-11e9-90cd-dedb0c92dc17_story.html|date=28 January 2019|first1=Morgan|last1=Smith|first2=Valerie|last2=Strauss|newspaper=Washington Post}}</ref> to put pressure on the US Department of Education to eradicate period poverty in the US. They called on the government to treat period products as health necessities, support policies that protect students who menstruate, and fund period products in school bathrooms. The campaign was built in partnership with the period poverty-focused nonprofit founded by social entrepreneur, [[Nadya Okamoto]].<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Smith|first1=Morgan|last2=Strauss|first2=Valerie|title=Activists call on Education Department to take action for 'menstrual equity'|language=en-US|newspaper=Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/activists-call-on-education-department-to-take-action-for-menstrual-equity/2019/01/28/815c6d08-2349-11e9-90cd-dedb0c92dc17_story.html|access-date=2020-10-22|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> Okamoto is also the author of the book, ''Period Power: a Manifesto for the Menstrual Movement,'' which focuses heavily on advocating against the "tampon tax."<ref>{{Cite web|last=Wischhover|first=Cheryl|date=2018-10-18|title=How one woman is trying to end period stigma and the "tampon tax"|url=https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/10/18/17994380/nadya-okamoto-period-power|access-date=2020-10-22|website=Vox|language=en}}</ref> When Okamoto was 21- years- old, she led her organization to host the first-ever National Period Day on October 19, 2019, which focused on pushing legislators to eliminate the "tampon tax."<ref>{{Cite web|last=America|first=Good Morning|title=On 1st National Period Day, youth group shines spotlight on 'tampon tax'|url=https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/living/story/1st-national-period-day-youth-group-shines-spotlight-66354429|access-date=2020-10-22|website=Good Morning America|language=en}}</ref> On National Period Day 2019, the organization supported local organizers to host 60 rallies in all 50 states.<ref>{{Cite web|title=National Period Day {{!}} Menstrual Equity {{!}} Seventh Generation|url=https://www.seventhgeneration.com/blog/first-ever-national-period-day|access-date=2020-10-22|website=www.seventhgeneration.com|language=en-US}}</ref>
 
Slovakia levies a 20% tax on sanitary products—the basic goods rate. A Slovakian film director commented that there are no plans to change the law and that east Europe missed elements of feminist change while living under communist government.<ref name="BBC: international"/>
Line 185 ⟶ 187:
* [https://www.periodtax.org/ Period tax website]
 
<br />{{Portal bar|Feminism|Government|Politics}}
{{Discrimination}}
{{Feminism}}