Content deleted Content added
m →Authenticity: Missing word |
m →Authenticity: Corrected name |
||
Line 12:
==Authenticity==
The publication of traditional folk literature was controversial at this time because of the dispute about the most famous of such collections, [[James Macpherson]]'s ''[[Ossian|The Poems of Ossian]]'', which purported to be translated from ancient Celtic poetry, but was widely believed to have been largely written by MacPherson himself. After the publication of ''Barzaz Breiz'', [[François-Marie Luzel]] criticised the work at a scholarly conference in 1868. At the 1872 Congress of the Breton Association at [[Saint-Brieuc]], he argued that the songs had been completely manufactured in the manner of
The dispute continued into the twentieth century. In 1907 La Villemarque's son, Pierre de la Villemarqué, published a defence of his father's work. However, in 1960 Francis Gourvil argued in a PhD thesis that the ''Barzaz Breiz'' was a forgery. In 1974 Donatien Laurent partially rejected these accusations by demonstrating the authenticity of the material of the book thanks to the discovery in 1964 of Villemarqué's notebooks. Laurent's research was published in 1989.<ref>Laurent, Donatien, ''Aux sources du Barzaz Breiz: la mémoire d'un peuple'', ed. ArMen, Douarnenez, 1989.</ref> Laurent concluded that Villemarqué had rearranged the material he had collected in order to enliven and clean up the texts and music, but that this was common practice at the time, comparable to work of the [[Brothers Grimm]].{{citation needed|date=February 2021}} An assessment of the dispute is given in the chapter "Collectors and Singers" of Mary-Ann Constantine's 1996 study ''[[Breton Ballads]]''.<ref name=gowans>{{cite journal |title=Reviewed Work(s): ''Breton Ballads'' by Mary-Ann Constantine |first=Linda |last=Gowans |journal=[[Jahrbuch für Volksliedforschung]] |year=1997 |volume=42 |pages=189–90 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/848056}}</ref>
| |||