(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Heritability of IQ: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Talk:Heritability of IQ: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 199:
:::::::::Those citations are also in this article (in the first paragraph of the "Heritability and caveats" section). Did you miss that? [[WP:LEADCITE]] tells us that if something is cited in the article body it is not necessary to cite it in the lead. And yes, the definition of heritability that's been present on the main article [[Heritability]] should be understood to have [[WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS]]. We cannot create a new definition here, per [[WP:LOCALCON]]. Rather, if you disagree with the established definition, you need to state your case at the main article. If you have additional concerns and would like to bring in a wider group of science-literate editors, I'd suggest posting at [[WP:FT/N]] –– but in terms of process they will tell you the same thing that I'm telling you now. [[User:Generalrelative|Generalrelative]] ([[User talk:Generalrelative|talk]]) 22:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 
::::::::::Are you referring to Delvin or Rose.? Those are the two citation attached to the first two sentences of the lede?. I guessing it's not Rose, since that's the reference which was just discarded. If you are referring to Delvin, that is not a textbook. Instead of incorrectly citing policy ("... consensus until it is disputed or reverted") it would help if you could just surface the textbook you are referring to. [[Special:Contributions/99.152.115.208|99.152.115.208]] ([[User talk:99.152.115.208|talk]]) 00:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 
{{hat|Refs}}