(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
User talk:Doug Coldwell: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 900:
 
{{ping|Etriusus}} This is first book published in 2015 by the college professor of '''''[https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/justus-s-stearns-michael-w-nagle/1121212651?ean=9780814341278&allFormats=true Michigan Pine King and Kentucky Coal Baron]''''' <br>
and was from a Good Article I created in 2010 on '''[[Justus S. Stearns]].''' --[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] ([[User talk:Doug Coldwell#top|talk]]) 20:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 
{{ping|Etriusus}} Since you are a medical student you would appreciate what a recent young doctor has said. ''I am feeling disillusioned with our community over their treatment of Doug. Dozens of "respected editors", including admins, reviewed his articles and most of them failed to see ''any'' major problems. For years. And Doug is singularly bearing the wrath of this lynch mob for the mess. Sure, he was in the wrong, but what about those dozens of well-established editors who looked at those articles over all these years and claimed there was nothing wrong. Does that not say a lot about competence of those "respected editors"? Who now have the audacity to throw him under the bus without taking accountability or at the very least acknowledging a critically flawed system of content review? If the people over at the kangaroo court had half the competence they pretend to have, this problem would have been noticed and dealt with years ago, without having to ban one of the more prolific (however flawed) editors of Wikipedia in this manner. I am sorry for my rant but I wanted someone to hear me out before I stopped editing. It was a pleasure knowing you and I hope you take care.'' --[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] ([[User talk:Doug Coldwell#top|talk]]) 12:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)