Content deleted Content added
→Name: Please fix the intro paragraph and the citation, both of which incorrectly suggest that anyone involved with the film said that the name of the creature was Cloverfield |
→Name: followup with respect to what WAS said. |
||
Line 388:
To call something "case designate" implies that this is a name assigned temporarily to the case, but that it is not final. At no point in the film or interviews has anyone in a position to know stated that this is the name assigned to the ''creature''. Never. Not once that I've seen. Wikipedia has created this idea, as far as I can tell, from whole cloth and one interviewer's speculation. -[[User:Harmil|Harmil]] ([[User talk:Harmil|talk]]) 20:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:Further note: in fact, the interviewee responded to that sentence, and clarified: "In the way that the Manhattan Project was the name of that program, that's what this is. [...] It's the way that this case has been designated. That's why that is on the trailer, and it becomes clearer in the film. It's how they refer to this phenomenon [or] this case."
:So the event – the phenomenon – is referred to as "Cloverfield", but just as the name of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was not "Manhattan," so too the name of this creature is not "Cloverfield"... at least not as far as we know or have been told. -[[User:Harmil|Harmil]] ([[User talk:Harmil|talk]]) 20:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
== SIZE ONE MORE TIME!!!! ==
| |||