Venkat TL

Discuss article content on Article talk page, and ping me from there.

If you post about article content here, you will be reverted.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aakar Patel has been accepted

Aakar Patel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 13:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For Aakar Patel's page. RPSkokie (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @RPSkokie. I am honored with your appreciation. Venkat TL (talk) 13:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Good catch!

You nailed it. Striking similarities, indeed. Bishonen | tålk 14:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC).

@Bishonen thank you. I had received two mass-pings in a day. Excessive even by his own standards. Venkat TL (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Price of the Modi Years

On 14 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Price of the Modi Years, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to the book Price of the Modi Years, the popularity of Indian prime minister Narendra Modi does not depend on his performance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Price of the Modi Years. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Price of the Modi Years), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

I am not an expert in navy problems

Recent Russian and Ukrainian references are censored.Xx236 (talk) 08:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

OK, Replied on your talk page. --Venkat TL (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Russian cruiser Moskva

On 15 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Russian cruiser Moskva, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, Venkat TL. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 22:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Teyora - Development first look!

Hi! I'm Ed6767, the original creator of RedWarn, now one of the most popular tools on the English Wikipedia that's been used by over 1,000 Wikimedians to make over 300,000 edits since mid-2020 that's been praised for its user friendliness and ease of use, but criticised for its limited functionality. I'm leaving this message as I think it may be of interest here - I left the RedWarn project in November to develop Teyora, my successor to RedWarn (alongside Chlod's UltraViolet). It's a new in development web app that uses some of the latest web technologies to create a highly extendable all in one editing tool with a focus on administration, counter vandalism and general patrolling - not to mention, it'll work on every Wikimedia project without any prior configuration and can be used by any user with at least auto-confirmed rights*. Now, I'm ready to give the Wikimedia community a first look at what I've been doing over the past six months and what to expect going forward.

You can check out the 20 minute first look at the in development version on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzlpnzXdLP4.

There's lots more to expect too! Why not read the full details page at meta:Teyora and leave any feedback, comments or wishes at meta:Talk:Teyora (please leave any correspondence there to keep discussion centralised). If you're interested, you can leave your signature

*with basic features, advanced features require configuration. To prevent abuse, auto-confirmed users will be in a restricted mode until approved by an admin or via rollback rights.

All the best, ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 23:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Renaming constituency articles

I see you've finished the TN ones. Please remember to correct the AC nav template as well. If you want, we can coordinate on this. That way, you can do the page moves, since you have the rights, and i can do minor cleanup. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Never mind about the TN nav template. I've done it. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, replied at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions Indian constituencies Venkat TL (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Done things differently?

I haven't been too active recently, but I saw the thread on ANI against you. Do you think you could have done anything differently? I think this comment is in a good direction, but I urge you to review things you should have done differently. For example, consider this comment you made at a DYK where I was involved. In hindsight do you think you should not have said some of the things you said in that comment? VR _talk 13:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

@Vice regent, there was a context to that comment, that is being ignored at ANI. My observations for which they are taking an offence were made more than a month ago, when I was upset that my DYKs was being closed without getting proper 'review-and-fix-cycles' as is expected with DYK nominations. Looking at the hindsight, I think I shouldn't have made it, I have not made any such comments since, and I will never make such comments again. It is probably a massive over reaction to use the incident about moving comment to article-talk-page, to ask for blocks and bans on what admin Maile66 called "a prolific editor". In summary, I have moved on from what has happened in past, and I dont expect those things that they found offensive to be repeated. I have already apologized. Venkat TL (talk) 19:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Annadale

Notifying you about the recent changes at Annadale, Shimla, possibly they've reverted your cleanup/copyedit. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk I am afraid I will no longer be able to update those pages as I am getting banned at ANI. Venkat TL (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK topic ban isn't it? I believe you can work other stuff. Anyway sorry to hear that. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Those are old incidents being recycled. Regardless I apologized. If the community believes I am an undesirable threat to Wikipedia and a ban is needed then I believe it is not appropriate for me to continue editing here. I wish you well. Venkat TL (talk) 19:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Don't let this discourage you. You are a good editor. It will be fine - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the appreciation Fylindfotberserk. Happy to know that you found my edits helpful. Sadly that does not appear to be the widely held opinion among the people that are supporting the bans. My contributions here were not made with intentions of troubling others. I fully understand scope of the ban, but the feeling of being an unwanted threat is too stressful for me to bear and continue as a volunteer contributor. --Venkat TL (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

News article about Uday Mandal.

Dear sir, Here is the news article about Uday Mandal and Samata Party in Hindustan Newspaper. Please review the link. Thank you https://www.livehindustan.com/bihar/patna/story-bihar-nitish-kumar-government-should-think-seriously-about-students-and-laborers-trapped-in-states-amid-corona-lockdown-samta-party-bihar-uday-mandal-3183331.amp.html समता1988 (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mann ministry

On 30 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mann ministry, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that eight of ten ministers in the Bhagwant Mann ministry are first-term members of the Punjab Legislative Assembly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mann ministry. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mann ministry), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Community topic ban

As a result of this discussion, you are indefinitely topic-banned from everything related to WP:DYK. Sandstein 08:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Attack on Arvind Kejriwal's residence

On 9 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Attack on Arvind Kejriwal's residence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the attack on the Delhi chief minister's residence, protesters painted the gate red and tried to scale it while police officers watched? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Attack on Delhi Chief Minister's house. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Attack on Arvind Kejriwal's residence), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

AutoPatroll

Hello,

I've noticed you recently received the page mover permission, congrats! You're very active in your duties and I've noticed that your pages are not autopatrolled, and I'd like to recommend you apply for the redirect autopatroll list. You've had a very busy day today and you're at over 300 links waiting for review at the moment (not your fault, you're doing great work). I wanted to suggest it because it would allow reviewers, like myself, to focus on the backlog that's been building up instead of pages like the ones you're dealing with, which are consistently legitimate and proper. No worries if you don't want to! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh where do I apply for the redirect autopatroll list. If it is something that you can request for me, (as written there) feel free. I have no objections. Sorry for the trouble if any. Venkat TL (talk) 17:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Venkat TL, no need to apologize, you are no trouble at all! You're doing great work and I'm sure myself and many others appreciate that. I'm just looking to start recommending it to users like yourself who make a large amount of contributions, just so that we can make a bigger dent in the new page receiver backlog. I've made the request here for you. Thanks for open and willing to it! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your tireless work in moving pages to make them fall in line with Wikipedia and WikiProject Indian politics standards. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @Hey man im josh. I am honored with your appreciation. Venkat TL (talk) 19:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Moving pages

Hello, Venkat TL,

When you are moving pages around, please consider whether there are redirects to the page that you are moving when you consider whether or not to leave a redirect behind. Not leaving redirects today caused there to be a lot of broken redirects (see here). If these were bad redirects or they worded poorly, then, no problem, they've been deleted. But if you are moving a page that has existed for a long time, there are likely some very useful redirects to it.

When you leave a redirect when moving a page, one of Wikipedia's helpful bots will fix the double redirect and point the old redirects to the new page location. When you choose not to leave a redirect, then the redirects are broken and they are either deleted by a bot or by an admin. So, before undertaking a big moving project, it can be helpful to check "What links here" for each page to see if there are a lot of redirects to the page you want to move. Then, you can either choose to leave a redirect, and the bot can correct them, or you can manually change all of the redirects yourself so they point to the correct, new page title.

Just a side note, if a vandal ever does a destructive page move, moving an article to a ludicrous new title, please, always leave a redirect even if the bad title is dumb. Because as soon as the vandal moved the page, the bots got to work and changed all of the redirects to point to the dumb title and if you don't leave a redirect when you correct the vandalism, those redirects will all be lost as broken redirects. It's tempting not to leave a redirect behind when you are correcting vandalism but the bots really need it to exist in order to fix the old redirects.

Thank you for all of your contributions to the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Liz, Only recently created typo were suppressed. After your comment and the link, I have gone through every entry on that page and retargetted wherever a suitable target exists. I hope this is resolved. In future for redirects that I supress, I will not leave the double redirects for the bot to fix, and I will fix it myself. (Since now I know that the bot cant do it). Venkat TL (talk) 06:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Aakar Patel

On 17 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aakar Patel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after activist Aakar Patel was prevented from travelling abroad, a court asked the director of India's Central Bureau of Investigation to apologise? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aakar Patel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aakar Patel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Venkat TL

Thank you for creating 15th Kerala Legislative Assembly.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Third Badal ministry moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Third Badal ministry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 13:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

2019 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election

Hi, I think you should have a look at these changes. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk I have raised it on the talk page. appears to be unintentional edits. Hope he responds. Venkat TL (talk) 16:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Saw that. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for your kind words. I would love to help and assist, if you enough worthy to add on. Cheers Love2read&write (talk) 11:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

if you *find* enough Love2read&write (talk) 11:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Duplicate fields in inboxes

Hello, thanks for all your work on infoboxes in constituency articles, but please have a look at Category:Pages_using_duplicate_arguments_in_template_calls. You might find User:Frietjes/findargdups useful during future edits. Thanks, Storchy (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

@Storchy Thanks for the links. I will fix them. Venkat TL (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Sidhu Moose Wala

On 29 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sidhu Moose Wala, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thryduulf (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Reliable and unreliable source over context

In previous edit here, this edit you provided references for what's reliable and unreliable. But here issue is lacking of information that sheds light on the context. On another hand, like tribune which has just one line which justifies the fact of "was facing four criminal cases, including two for obscene scenes". Isn't wrong to use mere a reference in the name of reliability? Shouldn't we use our consciences to judge worthy or unworthy? I am not against of anything, just curious to know about it. Thanks for stating what's written and good to know. It's really helpful and i appreciate it. Also how you memorize it or is there any way to get it during the course? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Love2read&write (talk • contribs) 04:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Love2read&write, thanks for your comment. Please note that any discussion related to the contents of the article Sidhu Moose Wala should happen at the page Talk:Sidhu Moose Wala, not here. Please see WP:TOI. Tribune is a reliable source, Times of India is not. You replaced a reliable source with a non reliable source, so your edit was reverted. Tribune is used to back up the contents of the article. Whatever was in the article was sourced to the given references. I dont know what you mean by "But here issue is lacking of information that sheds light on the context". Are you saying that was something in the Wikipedia article that was lacking a reliable source? We need to follow WP:Verifiability and WP:RS. Please read the last three blue links I posted before responding. I also find Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset to be very helpful summary of main points. Memorize what? --Venkat TL (talk) 09:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment, rest i'll discuss on concerned page. This is also very helpful. Love2read&write (talk) 09:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Tek Fog

On 3 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tek Fog, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to The Wire, the web application Tek Fog was used to "amplify right-wing propaganda" among Indians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tek Fog. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tek Fog), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for KK (singer)

On 4 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article KK (singer), which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 14:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Requesting article protection

Hello, Venkat. I see that your persistent requests for semi-protection of the article 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy have now been turned down three times in three days by three different administrators. Please get the message. There is simply not a big enough problem at the article to call for protection. See Wikipedia:Protection policy. At this article there are very, very few edits of any kind by IPs or new editors. There is virtually no vandalism. Some of the edits you have reverted, such as the one you mentioned here, look more like someone adding cited material that you disagree with, rather than disruption or vandalism; in such cases consider starting a discussion on the talk page. Bottom line, please do not request protection again unless something drastically changes at that article - that is, if there start to be repeated (multiple times in a day) vandalism edits by new users. Your repeated RFPP requests are on the verge of becoming disruptive. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

@MelanieN thank you for the note. I was not pinged first and second time, so I had no idea what happened to those requests. Only today I saw the response and got to know that both were denied as being not meeting the level of disruption. Normally they are approved but this time it was not. Thanks for explaining. Venkat TL (talk) 17:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Glad to help and thanks for understanding. Just so you know: if a protection request gets declined, it usually stays "live" on the protection page for a while, rather than being immediately archived like the ones that are protected. So if you request protection, you might want to check back on the RFPP page after 12 hours or so. If protection was declined it will probably still be visible. The admin who declines does not usually ping the person who requested protection. In any case, all requests get archived. The archives are at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, and can be searched for keywords using the archive box, just to the right of the "contents" list. -- MelanieN (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

@MelanieN got it. I assure you next time I will check the archives for the fate of the earlier request before making a second request. Venkat TL (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

The disruption crossed the threshold and the article was protected today. Venkat TL (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Venkat TL

Thank you for creating Punjab Assembly Committee on Public Accounts.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Maybe add some information on what this committee usually does

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Venkat TL

Thank you for creating Punjab Assembly Committee on Welfare of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Punjab Assembly Committee on Public Accounts

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://punjabassembly.nic.in/index.php/component/content/article?Itemid=119&id=35, which is not released under a compatible license. The page is marked as © Punjab Vidhan Sabha, All Rights Reserved. "open data" is not the same thing as "public domain". Open data only applies to numerical statistics and the like,and is typically machine readable. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the text had to be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 19:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Punjab Assembly Committee on Local Bodies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punjab Assembly Committee on Local Bodies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab Assembly Committee on Local Bodies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

User

HI, it is regarding this. The user is not a newcomer. First edit in October 2006. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk yes, but with only 150 edits, I doubt they know the rules properly, so I considered them for softer note. No harm done. Venkat TL (talk) 15:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

OK. They do it again, I'll report. I wonder why they can't understand the fact that their changes are affecting the syntax of images and at other places. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk Probably they are doing Copy and replace without previewing the changes before publishing. I have pinged 3-4 times already, so not seeing the pings also. Venkat TL (talk) 15:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

But they seem to clearly understand our edit summaries, since their replies are based on those. And their reverts were coming fast, means they are getting the notifications. May be WP:LISTEN or WP:CIR or both. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

sounds like an angry fan. I will stay away for now. Venkat TL (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Venkat TL

Thank you for creating Punjab Assembly Committee on Panchayati Raj Institutions.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

List of Hindi songs recorded by Asha Bhosle

This article has been proposed for deletion by same user. Can you please share your views on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hindi songs recorded by Asha Bhosle. Abbasulu (talk) 00:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

@Abbasulu I believe the AfD will be better served by your post on WT:IN and WT:ICTF Venkat TL (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Stop

Nominators are allowed to withdraw their AfDs. You have no right to object, even less so when you've been following me around AfDs and copy-pasting the same nonsensical arguments. Leave me alone. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)