(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Liouville function - Wikipedia

The Liouville lambda function, denoted by λらむだ(n) and named after Joseph Liouville, is an important arithmetic function. Its value is +1 if n is the product of an even number of prime numbers, and −1 if it is the product of an odd number of primes.

Explicitly, the fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that any positive integer n can be represented uniquely as a product of powers of primes: n = p1a1pkak, where p1 < p2 < ... < pk are primes and the aj are positive integers. (1 is given by the empty product.) The prime omega functions count the number of primes, with (Ωおめが) or without (ωおめが) multiplicity:

λらむだ(n) is defined by the formula

(sequence A008836 in the OEIS).

λらむだ is completely multiplicative since Ωおめが(n) is completely additive, i.e.: Ωおめが(ab) = Ωおめが(a) + Ωおめが(b). Since 1 has no prime factors, Ωおめが(1) = 0, so λらむだ(1) = 1.

It is related to the Möbius function μみゅー(n). Write n as n = a2b, where b is squarefree, i.e., ωおめが(b) = Ωおめが(b). Then

The sum of the Liouville function over the divisors of n is the characteristic function of the squares:

Möbius inversion of this formula yields

The Dirichlet inverse of Liouville function is the absolute value of the Möbius function, λらむだ–1(n) = |μみゅー(n)| = μみゅー2(n), the characteristic function of the squarefree integers. We also have that λらむだ(n) = μみゅー2(n).

Series

edit

The Dirichlet series for the Liouville function is related to the Riemann zeta function by

 

Also:

 

The Lambert series for the Liouville function is

 

where   is the Jacobi theta function.

Conjectures on weighted summatory functions

edit
 
Summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 104. The readily visible oscillations are due to the first non-trivial zero of the Riemann zeta function.
 
Summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 107. Note the apparent scale invariance of the oscillations.
 
Logarithmic graph of the negative of the summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 2 × 109. The green spike shows the function itself (not its negative) in the narrow region where the Pólya conjecture fails; the blue curve shows the oscillatory contribution of the first Riemann zero.
 
Harmonic Summatory Liouville function T(n) up to n = 103

The Pólya problem is a question raised made by George Pólya in 1919. Defining

  (sequence A002819 in the OEIS),

the problem asks whether   for n > 1. The answer turns out to be no. The smallest counter-example is n = 906150257, found by Minoru Tanaka in 1980. It has since been shown that L(n) > 0.0618672n for infinitely many positive integers n,[1] while it can also be shown via the same methods that L(n) < -1.3892783n for infinitely many positive integers n.[2]

For any  , assuming the Riemann hypothesis, we have that the summatory function   is bounded by

 

where the   is some absolute limiting constant.[2]

Define the related sum

 

It was open for some time whether T(n) ≥ 0 for sufficiently big nn0 (this conjecture is occasionally–though incorrectly–attributed to Pál Turán). This was then disproved by Haselgrove (1958), who showed that T(n) takes negative values infinitely often. A confirmation of this positivity conjecture would have led to a proof of the Riemann hypothesis, as was shown by Pál Turán.

Generalizations

edit

More generally, we can consider the weighted summatory functions over the Liouville function defined for any   as follows for positive integers x where (as above) we have the special cases   and   [2]

 

These  -weighted summatory functions are related to the Mertens function, or weighted summatory functions of the Moebius function. In fact, we have that the so-termed non-weighted, or ordinary function   precisely corresponds to the sum

 

Moreover, these functions satisfy similar bounding asymptotic relations.[2] For example, whenever  , we see that there exists an absolute constant   such that

 

By an application of Perron's formula, or equivalently by a key (inverse) Mellin transform, we have that

 

which then can be inverted via the inverse transform to show that for  ,   and  

 

where we can take  , and with the remainder terms defined such that   and   as  .

In particular, if we assume that the Riemann hypothesis (RH) is true and that all of the non-trivial zeros, denoted by  , of the Riemann zeta function are simple, then for any   and   there exists an infinite sequence of   which satisfies that   for all v such that

 

where for any increasingly small   we define

 

and where the remainder term

 

which of course tends to 0 as  . These exact analytic formula expansions again share similar properties to those corresponding to the weighted Mertens function cases. Additionally, since   we have another similarity in the form of   to   in so much as the dominant leading term in the previous formulas predicts a negative bias in the values of these functions over the positive natural numbers x.

References

edit
  1. ^ Borwein, P.; Ferguson, R.; Mossinghoff, M. J. (2008). "Sign Changes in Sums of the Liouville Function". Mathematics of Computation. 77 (263): 1681–1694. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-08-02036-X.
  2. ^ a b c d Humphries, Peter (2013). "The distribution of weighted sums of the Liouville function and Pólyaʼs conjecture". Journal of Number Theory. 133 (2): 545–582. arXiv:1108.1524. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2012.08.011.