Talk:Alemany Maze
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alemany Maze article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not all article needs to be a seperate page, dont be strong about that. This page is overflow because it is mention on that article. you know why the yellow tag is on that page, that page is badly written.--Freewayguy (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Fixed runaway HTML tag in signature. HaeB (talk) 08:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Merging is not the solution
editMerrging all of this article to San Francisco Bay Area freeways was not a good solution to weaknesses of either page. At SFBa, it unbalanced the article, with a couple of paragraphs about Alemany Maze and a much shorter description of the more important MacArthur Maze, with a link to its main article. I prefer the way that the MacArthur part was set up before, if Alemany and the other major interchanges were handled the same way. It would keep SFBa from getting bloated and allow expansion of maze articles separately. Just having a linked list isn't bad either.--Hjal (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Maybe not a solution. Same as I-587. The development manager wants us not to worry about the page size. Almenay Maze has enough to write anyways. SF Bay is about disabm of the Highway Systems.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 01:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
it's probably just like Orange Crush, and alot in LA-Orange County. They have merly enough contents.--Freewayguy 01:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)