(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Bobby Jindal - Wikipedia

Talk:Bobby Jindal

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2601:1C2:5200:DF30:85E8:C1D4:852:230B in topic So where is Jindahl now?


Fairness Doctrine

edit

It's not explained how the subject was supposed to have "opposed the Fairness Doctrine" (under Civil Liberties under Political Positions) when that doctrine was abolished just after he turned sixteen years old when he was in high school and held no office. (?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.34.131.212 (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The statement is not sourced, so I deleted it. If an editor can find a source they are welcome to put it back. ---- Work permit (talk) 19:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced material, tags, and assessment

edit

I remove the unsourced section and July 2016 "BLP unsourced section" tag. The B-class criteria (#1) states: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable. A tag is a challenge. Otr500 (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bobby Jindal's name (first entry)

edit

I wanted to check that the consensus is still that the first entry on Bobby Jindal should be Piyush "Bobby" Jindal .... Recently, the first sentence in the lead was changed to Piyush Jindal. I did some searching in the archives, and the issue seems to have been discussed at Talk:Bobby_Jindal/Archive_1#Placement_of_nickname_in_lede and Talk:Bobby_Jindal/Archive_1#Jindal.27s_name.

My interpretation of these discussions is that the consensus is that the first entry on Bobby Jindal should be Piyush "Bobby" Jindal .... This makes sense to me since it also seems to follow MOS:NICKNAME. Is there a need to establish a new consensus, or is that still the consensus? palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 03:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply


edit
 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster (Chat) 00:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

So where is Jindahl now?

edit

He seems to have disappeared from view. 2601:1C2:5200:DF30:85E8:C1D4:852:230B (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply