(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Eruption column - Wikipedia
Former good articleEruption column was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 8, 2005Good article nomineeListed
May 14, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Clarification Needed: Column Height in relation to Atmospheric Temperature

edit

Does this mean a column is higher in cold weather or in hot weather? How big is the height difference between the same eruption in i.e. -30°C vs. +30°C? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:1065:B8E0:0:0:0:6E47 (talk) 04:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Column height is determined by the level at which the column density equals surrounding air density. This is usually well into the stratosphere, where temperature begins to rise with altitude and the density correspondingly drops faster with altitude. I have never seen a discussion of variation with weather or latitude, but the tropopause (base of the stratosphere) is at a higher altitude in the tropics than at higher latitudes, so eruption columns may actually be higher in the tropics than near the poles. Kent G. Budge (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Eruption column/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

GA Sweeps: Delisted

edit

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I believe the article currently has multiple issues that need to be addressed, and as a result, I have delisted the article. The article was passed in 2005, and since then, the criteria has been significantly expanded. The main reason for delisting is the lack of inline citations throughout the article. Multiple paragraphs are unsourced throughout. To improve the article, add additional sources from a variety of sources to provide a balanced representation of the information present. Perhaps sources can be pulled from the main articles linked to within the article. Look to books, magazines, newspaper articles, other websites, etc. In addition, see if any other images can be added to the article for some of the other sections, I'm sure there are some great ones out there. Although it has been delisted, the article can be return to GA status by addressing the above points. Once sources are added and cleanup is done, I recommend renominating the article at WP:GAN. If you need assistance with any of these issues, please contact me on my talk page and I'll do my best to help you out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 07:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eruption column. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply