Talk:Hildegard Hammerschmidt-Hummel
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Embedded lists
editDancter critizes "embedded lists". I don't quite see the point. I mean, what do you expect when the headline of a chapter reads "Select List of publications", "List of TV programmes" or "Select list of interviews"? A sonnet?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snemelc (talk • contribs) 10:03, 25 August 2008
Deletion?
editThis is a highly dubious article. Its excessive length gives the false impression that Hammerschmidt-Hummel is a notable Shakespeare scholar. Much of the text is directly lifted from her personal website. The sensationalist sub-headings (e.g. 'Identifying Shakespeare’s Dark Lady' and 'Presenting proof for Shakespeare’s secret Catholicism') and the use of the word 'findings' might suggest that she has actually presented reliable evidence and made major discoveries, which is not the case. Hammerschmidt-Hummel is not very well-known (unlike many Shakespeare specialists who do not have their own Wikipedia article) and has never been taken seriously by the academic community. I would therefore recommend deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.89.68 (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that this article seems highly biased and deserves to be reviewed more carefully for deletion. However, I'm not familiar enough with the field to evaluate the sources. I'd like to recommend you review the procedure for deleting an article at WP:AFD. At the same time, please feel free to review the article for anything that does not meet the notability guidelines for an academic at WP:ACADEMIC. This article needs to be scrubbed of the resume cruft by someone qualified to it. Ronnotel (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Cancer on Shakespeare's nose?
The Roberta Ballantine contention that much of what we adhere to
being Shakespeare's is in actuality much of Marlowe might be down
to Marlowe being a sailor, something new to me and perhaps others,
and the Sun exposure had more work on Marlowe than Shakespeare thus
helping the Ballantine contention Marlowe worked for the state
or royal service and could not author plays.