Talk:Liquid-Plumr

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Unclear history

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The last line of the article hints vaguely at an earlier history of Liquid-Plumr than P&G's ownership. Could someone familiar with its earlier history please flesh this out? For example who invented it and when? Any patent challenges by Drano? Etc. etc. Vaughan Pratt (talk) 16:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic