Talk:Osteocyte
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
edithttp://www.bioeng.auckland.ac.nz/anatml/anatml/database/cells/cells/parts/part/part_16.html
tie to osteon needed
editThis article should tie Osteocytes to osteons. 08:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Illustrations Needed
editAs a recent vandal pointed out, this page has no images... Whilst I am NOT about to sue wikipedia for 40,000 dollars unlike the other user, I have emailed the owner of some very nice Osteocyte photos on Flickr, and suggested opening up the license so that they can be added here... --Tomhannen 08:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
== Improvement == 30/03/2011
Is there anyone who can improve/edit this page. At the moment it is of poor quality. I would like to help improve it but am new to the editing of wikipedia pages so wouldn't know where to begin. thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.121.236.207 (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
"Clinical Significance"
editCan someone take a look at the "Clinical Significance" section and improve it. Generally, Wikipedia should refrain from making subjective statements such as "very fascinating research".
Additionally, the terminology of the section is extremely dense. I did not dedicate a tremendous amount of time to trying to understand it, but after reading it three times I still did not get what it was saying. I'm not sure if it's possible to make it more comprehensible to a lay-reader, but if someone with the medical background necessary to understand it is willing to take the time to re-word it, I think that would be an improvement. 50.26.225.7 (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Matt