Talk:SMP/E
< Talk:SMP
Latest comment: 40 minutes ago by Chatul in topic Citations in Use section
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
SMP vs. Linux systems
editI'd like to add a statement or section comparing the IBM philosophy of replacing individual elements of packages with the Linux/unix system of replacing a whole package by installing a .deb or .rpm, but I don't think I know enough to be sure of being correct. Peter Flass (talk) 20:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- @Peter Flas: SMP and SMP/E can be considered both configuration management software like, e.g., SCCS, CVS, Subversion, Git, and package managers, e.g., APT, YUM. However, SMP has a much more robust way to handle dependencies, while not offering much support for merging independent changes to the same element. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 22:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Citations in Use section
editI've reinstated § Use and added two citations to entire manuals. Should I also add citations to each of the references to a specific commands, or are the citations in the first paragraph adequate? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 18:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)