(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
User talk:Ajack15 - Wikipedia

Ajack15, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Ajack15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


July 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Zendaya, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury04:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am not disruptive editing. I disagree with the decision you have come to and you all refuse to acknowledge that. I will stop editing so that my account is saved, but you at the very least can listen to my reasons for editing the page. I believe that the way she is professionally credited as is important information to the article, and to leave it out is not wise. If you do not want it to be in the first sentence, then put it in another section. Do not omit the information completely. Ajack15 (talk) 04:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I take my last response back, you were right, I was disruptive editing I’m sorry Ajack15 (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zendaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Chemical Hearts

edit

Hello. I see that you edited Chemical Hearts again and deleted my section about 'audience percentage'. I went ahead and changed it again. Audience reactions are a valid thing that is mentioned in other Wikipedia pages about movies and is also mentioned on the website of Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes. -- J.A.R. Huygebaert

Audience reactions are not supported on Wikipedia, as it is seen as user generated content. I added a section about it to the Chemical Hearts page. If you keep editing it I’m going to reverts it. Ajack15 (talk) 13:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Critics' Choice Super Awards

edit
 

The article Critics' Choice Super Awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:N. Award show has not taken place yet, and coverage of it in reliable sources is scarce. Cannot WP:INHERIT notability from the Critic's choice awards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro (talk) 04:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, 1st Critics' Choice Super Awards

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 1st Critics' Choice Super Awards. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Critics' Choice Super Awards. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Critics' Choice Super Awards. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Birds of Prey (2020 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit
 

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On The White Tiger (film).Diannaa (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I’m sorry. I didn’t realize. Ajack15 (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merger discussion for 11th Critics' Choice Television Awards

edit

  An article that you have been involved in editing—11th Critics' Choice Television Awards—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 188.148.229.11 (talk) 20:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Carolina Film Critics Association (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Colour of template nom (Nominated)

edit

You might find it interesting to join Template talk:Table cell templates § RfC on the colour of template for Nominated. --Fernando Trebien (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:North Carolina Film Critics Association

edit

  Hello, Ajack15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Carolina Film Critics Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:North Carolina Film Critics Association

edit
 

Hello, Ajack15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "North Carolina Film Critics Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring by user to force his edits into the plot summary

edit

You appear to be edit warring against two editors, Debressor and myself, in order to force your version of the edit into the Women Talking article. If you incapable to reducing the size of your overlong plot summary, then it can be replaced readily with the old plot summary. No further reverts without Talk page. Your plot summary is much too long and is currently in violation of Wikpedia plot summary guidelines and copyright restrictions. ErnestKrause (talk) 17:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, The Age of Pleasure, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 00:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alligator Bites Never Heal (August 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alligator Bites Never Heal has been accepted

edit
 
Alligator Bites Never Heal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply