(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
User talk:Liaton9000 - Wikipedia

A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Liaton9000! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! JarrahTree 08:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pfizer

edit

@Liaton9000: You seem to be filling this article with lots and lots of PR, press-releases and other crap WP:SPS and unreliable sources. Why are you doing that. scope_creepTalk 09:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure how to answer your question, because I wasn't aware I was using "crap" and "unreliable" sources. That being said, I am happy to take this opportunity to compare my sources with the WP:SPS guidelines and remove any that are low-quality or inappropriate.
I'm new to actively editing Wikipedia, so any constructive criticism you can provide would be very helpful. In the meantime, feel free to track my changes and let me know if I don't address the issues to your satisfaction. Liaton9000 (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Just to follow up, I've located what I think is the relevant section:
"Self-published material is characterized by the lack of independent reviewers (those without a conflict of interest) validating the reliability of the content. Further examples of self-published sources include press releases, the material contained within company websites, advertising campaigns, material published in media by the owner(s)/publisher(s) of the media group, self-released music albums, and electoral manifestos..."
If you can point me to any further sections that may be applicable, please let me know! Liaton9000 (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Liaton9000, visitor here. Some other policies about primary sources are WP:PRIMARY (describing a number of limits about how they can be used), WP:NOTDATABASE ("data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources"), and WP:INDY (describing how we use those independent reliable sources to summarize a topic's "role and achievements within society, rather than offering a directory listing or the contents of a sales brochure"). I hope this helps. Llll5032 (talk) 21:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wonderful, thank you very much for the information. I will dive into these resources and adjust my editing accorrdingly! Liaton9000 (talk) 22:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Campbell Collaboration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian Directorate for Health.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cochrane (organisation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cochrane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afsaneh Mashayekhi Beschloss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gavi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Liam Sturgess

edit

  Hello, Liaton9000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liam Sturgess, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Liaton9000/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Liaton9000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 06:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Engineering World Health, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Philip's College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Liaton9000! Your additions to John Lavis have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Diannaa, thank you for bringing this to my attention.
I reviewed the edits and I am not sure which of my contributions were in violation of copyright, but I do see that a segment has been removed that was not added by me.
Can you clarify for me if I, indeed, violated copyright, or if I somehow interacted with the pre-existing copyrighted material that led to my being caught in the copyright notice?
If it was indeed my edits that were the problem, then I apologize and thank you for the guidance! Liaton9000 (talk) 02:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Liam Sturgess

edit
 

Hello, Liaton9000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Liam Sturgess".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Science World (Vancouver), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marriott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cancer Moonshot.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

National Resilience moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, National Resilience, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Coalition for National Science Funding moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Coalition for National Science Funding, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Our World in Data, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:National Resilience

edit

  Hello, Liaton9000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Resilience, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Cordero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harper.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Coalition for National Science Funding

edit

  Hello, Liaton9000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coalition for National Science Funding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gracia Martore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tegna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Del Bigtree
added a link pointing to The Hill
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 2024 presidential campaign
added a link pointing to The Hill

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Global Business Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Food shortage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply