User talk:Msrasnw/2014

Proposed deletion of Ruth Crisp

The article Ruth Crisp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Proposed deletion per WP:N. I couldn't find any secondary sources on this individual other than the obituaries included in the article itself.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stubbleboy 04:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruth Crisp

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ruth Crisp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Stubbleboy 04:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Charles Hailey

Hi, I've responded to your concerns on the DYK page. The slumping technique is not localized to telescopy and has been used in e.g. pottery for thousands of years. However, the application to telescopy is quite new, especially the technique being used on NuSTAR. Astro interest (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Sidney Pollard

Hi Msrasnw, thanks for starting the Sidney Pollard article. I have expanded the article some more by translating the German Wikipedia article here, but you might want to check a thing or two. Thanks. -- Mdd (talk) 14:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

THanks - I'll have a look. (Msrasnw (talk) 11:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC))

Lilian Knowles

This article has issues; you can resolve them before I approve its DYK nomination. --George Ho (talk) 04:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I have replied on the DYK nomination page for Lilian Knowles‎ and your talk. (Msrasnw (talk) 11:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC))

DYK for Lilian Knowles

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Recreated article

Hi, I was looking at the articles at AfC, and I noticed that there is a draft of Santosh K. Mehrotra. It looks like it has the same problems as last time. I thought you did a good job on that article and still think the outcome should have been different. Despite my bad arguments. Anyway, it's there if you want to look at it. – Margin1522 (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Oh dear. Yes I think there will be the same problems again. I think the afd last time was unfair and some of the deleters should have been in my view more considerate. This seems a common problem those wishing to delete doing so not based on knowing the subject or evidence but as a reaction against autobiographical things. I was very disappointed with some of the contributors there and the deleting administrator. People are often reluctant to change their minds as they think it makes them look weak or something. I had a little draft of a trimmed down version but someone wanted it deleting. Anyway I don't know how to proceed. I guess the author of the draft won't engage with debates either and hasn't realised that a much terser article would have a much better chance of getting on. I think it is very funny how someone with the profile of Mehrotra doesn't get to have an article because of the self promotion/coi things and the difficulties with Indian sources. Best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC))

Precious

economic change
Thank you for quality articles such as Waves of the Danube, Journal of Agrarian Change and Lilian Knowles, for advice and wishes, for your mantra "Quick new page" and for quoting Suffer fools gladly, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1155 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wushishi tramway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Silverdale, Lancashire

Any particular reason for this revert? Reverts are not normally considered "minor edits", BTW. PC78 (talk) 20:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for letting me know. PC78 (talk) 06:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Removal of rollback

This type of request should go at WT:PERM. But I'm here, so I can help you... you have been accidentally hitting rollback? I'm happy to remove rollback for you but I would like to first make you aware of confirmationRollback which is a script that requires confirmation before rollback is performed. This should alleviate the accidental rollbacks. If you still wish to have rollback removed, please confirm here and I will do it for you. Best — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:05, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Dear MusikAnimal, sorry to have bothered you and have asked in the wrong place. Yes I think it best just to remove my right to rollback. I was planning to do things which might have needed it but I think I am not so suited to that role. Thanks very much in advance (Msrasnw (talk) 23:11, 11 May 2015 (UTC))

Removed. And for the record, you bothered no one! Wish you all the best, and should you want rollback again don't hesitate to ask. — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:17, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Louis Auguste Say

Hello. This page that you created Louis Auguste Say, is a duplicate of Louis Say. Both pages are terrible and I will try to improve Louis Say with in-line references. Since his company was named Louis Say & cie, I think we could drop the middle name, don't you think? Do we need to ask an administrator to merge the page you created with Louis Say so that there is a redirect? I have created redirect when the page did not exist, but not when it is already here. Btw, if you want to help me improve Louis Say, please feel free to do so. Please reply on my talkpage. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Sunday Times Experts - fast delete request

Could not find anything apart from your 2 articles on the Sunday Times Experts that shows they are experts in blood doping.

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Ashenden

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Ashenden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RonaldDuncan (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robin Parisotto

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robin Parisotto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RonaldDuncan (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

They have now been on Wikipedia for a month an if there was more info it should be there by now.

My suggestion is that they need to have done something more in their field than be hired by a Newspaper for a controversial study.RonaldDuncan (talk)

Hi have done a bit more research on both experts, and I think that Michael Ashenden could have an article, but it needs a few more sources. e.g. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17586597 rather than your previous source linking back to the Sunday Times article you need to bring out he was on the UCI panel, and some of his other work. It may be best to refer to Robin Parisotto in a Michael Ashenden article.

Sorry RonaldDuncan (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Restored

No problem they are at User talk:Msrasnw/Robin Parisotto and User talk:Msrasnw/Michael Ashenden. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Linda Bostock

The article Linda Bostock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citation to independent sources (only something written by her co-author that barely mentions her, to establish the mere existence of her and the book series she has written with the co-author), no indication of real notability. No prestigious awards and honors listed. No journal editorships or prominent positions identified.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sue Chandler

The article Sue Chandler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citation to independent sources, no indication of notability. No prestigious awards and honors listed. No journal editorships or prominent positions identified.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hubert Parry

After your recent excellent incursion chez Stanford I am emboldened to ask if you could be suborned into working on Hubert Parry's article. I had a go a few years back, and then a really excellent editor took the baton and made major improvements before the demands of real life obliged him to leave off. We are getting a lot of British composers up to FA, and it would be good if Parry could be got up to that level. Pray ponder. Quite understand if the answer is a firm No, of course, but nothing venture, nothing win. Tim riley talk 20:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Filip Mentel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filip Mentel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filip Mentel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 16:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Economics Network for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Economics Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economics Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:43, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oliver L. Austin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oliver L. Austin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dan D. Ric (talk) 12:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Koos van Ellinckhuijzen

Hi Msrasnw. Thought I would let you know that Koos van Ellinckhuijzen has passed away. I haven't updated the article, as I don't have a source, looks like the media in Namibia has not picked up on it yet. I knew him personally, what a human being! Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 20:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Msrasnw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Haitian Standard French listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Haitian Standard French. Since you had some involvement with the Haitian Standard French redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Savvyjack23 (talk) 22:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Msrasnw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Manchester SSEM circularity

I updated my comment here. I think yu can see my point, no? Is there a reason we should persist in this circularity, using a name that's used just because Wikipedia adopted it? Dicklyon (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Dear Mr Lyon, I am afraid I think your whole line on this feels to me bit odd or over the top. And I don't see the circularity you see. That is I am not sure you have established that wikipedia is the source of this title rather than Burton and the www.computer50.org which seem to me fine as sources. "Baby" seems to me clearly a nickname, the Small-Scale Experimental Machine (SSEM) the standard "formal" name, and Manchester SSEM used in enough proper sources for it to be not only OK - but it also seems the most useful title. I am not sure why you are objecting so much to Chris Burton's role in the establishment of name. I have very little proper knowledge in this area but on reading the page in question I started, in my usual slightly shoddy way, the page on Geoff Tootill because it was missing (one of the few ways of improving the well written Wikipedia article on the Manchester SSEM that I could see was to add a page on him), have seen the rebuilt machine at MOSI (which is great) and had personal correspondence (on an unrelated issue) with one of the authors of the peer reviewed papers from 2014 that used "the Manchester Small-Scale Experimental Machine ('The Baby')" (cited to the www.computer50.org a completely reputable source which you also seem to object to.).

I think the wording in the policy on this Wikipedia:Article_titles#Considering_changes squares with my feelings about the issue:

• Changing one controversial title to another without a discussion that leads to consensus is strongly discouraged.

- I can't see there was a consensus building just rival camps lining up.

• If an article title has been stable for a long time, and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed.

- This seems true to me here

• Consensus among editors determines if there does exist a good reason to change the title.

- This does not seem to me to be happening

• If it has never been stable, or it has been unstable for a long time, and no consensus can be reached on what the title should be, default to the title used by the first major contributor after the article ceased to be a stub.

- This is not really relevant but does seem to give some weight to the first major contributor to the article. And they went with the current name.

In particular this strikes me as very relevent:

• Debating controversial titles is often unproductive, and there are many other ways to help improve Wikipedia.

Anyway - my feeling is that your approach to this matter is a little unkind and any change in title as you suggest would not only not be detrimental but also result in more unhappiness. I think turning our attention to new articles/pages filling in more of the gaps in our encyclopdia would better. An exapnsion of the section on the replica of the SSEM might be nice or even a new page as it might make the article to big. But in any case best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC))

Adam Tanner (mathematician)

Xx236 (talk) 11:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Thanks and sorry :) (Msrasnw (talk) 11:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC))

I have made a redirect.Xx236 (talk) 11:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Tanner (theologian)

Hello Msrasnw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adam Tanner (theologian) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Adam Tanner (mathematician).

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xx236 (talk) 11:12, 25 September 2018 (UTC) - Thanks and sorry about this. I should be more careful. Have moved original to AT (Jesuit theologian). Can't find sources about his maths stuff. (Msrasnw (talk) 12:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC))

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Msrasnw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

May 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jasper Carrott, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Graywalls (talk) 13:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

I just revived your old Data citation article. Thanks for making it back in 2012. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts

Further information: Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts

Hello there. One or more of your pages have DEFAULTSORT conflicts: (search)

• User:Msrasnw/bostockandchandler

Please either

• <nowiki> DEFAULTSORTs (if your page is a draft consisting of multiple subjects); or
• remove redundant DEFAULTSORTs (if your page is a draft with multiple DEFAULTSORTs); or
• remove all DEFAULTSORTs (otherwise)

in the affected pages. Thank you. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 03:45, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Making significant edits and marking them minor almost every single time. Graywalls (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry if I have made some error. But I am not sure what this is about. (Msrasnw (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC))
  • I see now it was the addition of refs to the stub on Carter's coefficient. I should have said I was adding refs sorry. (Msrasnw (talk) 22:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC))
    • No, it is about almost every single one of your edit. this for example is NOT a minor edit. Looking through your edit history, you have been marking essentially EVERY single edit you make as a minor. The default setting isn't "minor". I am wondering if you're using an external software or a script in making your edits... If you read the page Help:Minor edit, then it is very clear that a lot of edits you make are NOT minor. It seems like that the same reminder I left you this May was not getting to you. Graywalls (talk) 01:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Indeed I must be more careful. Thank you for your kind guidance. (Msrasnw (talk) 13:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)) PS I think the Carrot removal was removing vandalism and many of the others are where it has been an edit as part of a series of others where one is not marked as minor. PPS Thanks for putting Carter's coefficient in a useful place and don't worry about having deleted the little article/stubb without letting me know. Sadly we have lost the sources referencing Carter himself. Perhaps a note in the linked to article. (Msrasnw (talk) 13:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonio José Ruiz de Padrón

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Antonio José Ruiz de Padrón requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dr42 (talk) 11:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Eric Quayle

Hi Thank you so much for starting the page for Eric Quayle (my father), was just wondering how/ why you started the page? Did you know him? Thanks Dabriellaq (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

• Dear Dabriellaq, no... I am sorry I unfortunately didn't know your father. I just stumbled across him when reading about Ballantyne and thought a little bit of a biography on wikipedia might be nice. I am not sure really about my motivations for contributing to the wikipedia project and making lots of little pages. Anyway thank you for your thanks and do let me know if you need any help on wikipedia generally or if there is anything else we could, should and you would like adding or taking away from the article on your dad. Best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 10:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC))

"The Letter for the King" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Letter for the King. Since you had some involvement with the The Letter for the King redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 06:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

1988 Birthday Honours

Thanks for reverting my delinking of Egil Robert Orskov on 1988 Birthday Honours. When Wikiloop Battlefield identified it, it was a red link. Regards Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

• Dear User:Wyatt Tyrone Smith No worries.... But I think WP:Redlink Argues "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject." I am not sure if this is a policy or guidance or.... Best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal Economic Society Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Economic Society Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)