(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
User talk:TableSalt43 - Wikipedia

Welcome

edit

Hello, TableSalt43, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


Added Saburra (Numidian General) to deaths.

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle off Carteia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Battle off Carteia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 12:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle off Carteia (46 BC)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Battle off Carteia (46 BC) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 12:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Caesar's Civil War battles (March 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 21:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, TableSalt43! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 21:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • This item has been returned to draft as it was moved to article-space after being declined, but without addressing the issues raised by the reviewer. Please develop as a draft and re-submit when considered ready. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 14:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Tauris (April 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Battle of Tauris has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle of Tauris. Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 18:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of Caesar's Civil War battles

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Caesar's Civil War battles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Milford Derrick (Pilot)

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Milford Derrick (Pilot), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of Caesar's Civil War battles

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Caesar's Civil War battles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Milford Derrick (Pilot)

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Milford Derrick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello TableSalt43! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of San Roque (1899), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://lutongcavite.blogspot.com/2018/08/battle-of-san-roque-cavite-province.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Battle of San Roque (1899) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 23:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Tauris

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Tauris, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Corduba

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Corduba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of the Baetis (44 BC)

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of the Baetis (44 BC), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, TableSalt43. Thank you for your work on Raid on Mazatlán Railway (1910). User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice article, you should expand the lead a bit. At least say who the battle was between and where it occurred.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 13:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Battle of Parque (1912)

edit

Hello, TableSalt43,

Thank you for creating Battle of Parque (1912).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please check your article for copyright violations. https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Battle%20of%20Parque%20(1912)&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0&noredirect=true

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 04:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Cuernavaca (1912) and Battle of Parque (1912)

edit

Hi TableSalt43. You've used the short form references "Meade 2016" and "Womack 1968" in these articles, but have not added the required full cite to describe the works they refer to. You need to add the full cites to the articles, or you can let me know what works these are and I'll can do it for you. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested transmissions °co-ords° 09:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Emiliano Zapata into Battle of Parque (1912). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's been done. Thanks for feedback. TableSalt43 (talk) 13:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Zaragoza (1913) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Battle of Zaragoza (1913), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Chihuahua (1913) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Battle of Chihuahua (1913), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Battle of the Baetis (44 BC) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle of the Baetis (44 BC). Thanks! Nocturnal781 (talk) 23:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:BSA Troop 502

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BSA Troop 502, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Battle of Chihuahua (1913) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Chihuahua (1913) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Chihuahua (1913) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 09:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of La Ceiba

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of La Ceiba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of La Ceiba

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of La Ceiba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Guadalupe Church

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Guadalupe Church, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Draft:Battle of Alba Longa (753). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Guadalupe Church

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Guadalupe Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Salona

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Salona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of San Miguelito

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of San Miguelito, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Corduba

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Corduba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Salona

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Salona".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of San Miguelito

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of San Miguelito".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:04, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of the Baetis (44 BC)

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of the Baetis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Alba Longa (753)

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Alba Longa (753), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

You have been pruned from a list

edit

Hi TableSalt43! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Alba Longa (753)

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Alba Longa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello TableSalt43! Your additions to Draft:New York Armory Raid (1775) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:New York Armory Raid (1775)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:New York Armory Raid (1775) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://docshare.tips/boston-campaign_58afa661b6d87f6aae8b5e3b.html and https://www.varsitytutors.com/earlyamerica/early-america-review/volume-7/new-york-city-during-the-revolution. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copying

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Alba Longa into Battle of Alba Longa. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 09:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Short citation style on Acron (King of the Caeninenses)

edit

Hi TableSalt43, you have recently moved Acron (King of the Caeninenses) to the mainspace and you've used inline citations that follow short form and a bibliography, but the reference style is unclear. Would you mind clarifying the citation style used in regards to last name, year, and page(s) in the short section? Consider using the {{sfn}} template. Thanks, microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 16:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, the citations are all in the Bibliography, and then you can see what is abbreviated. ex. Dion. Hal = Dionysius of Halicarnassus. As for the pages, they are broken down into book numbers (of series), pages, and then sub section.
Have a great day! TableSalt43 (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Rome (753 BC), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caenina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Antemnae (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Afyaniuhai was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ANUwrites 18:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC cleanup following pagemoves

edit

Hi, I notice you are moving a large number of pages from the Draft space with their AfC templates to the mainspace. The draft space is suitable for drafting articles but your creation process is adding WP:AfC templates to your pages, and these are being left in the mainspace following your page move. Recently, this has occurred on Acron (King of the Caeninenses) and now Second Battle of Rome (753 BC), Battle of Caenina, Battle of Nomentum, and Battle of Rome (753 BC). Can you ensure that you cleanup your drafts before moving them to mainspace, as I have done here: Special:Diff/1213560404.

Alternatively, you could also consider starting your drafts in your sandbox as subpages which will not create the templates.

Thanks, microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 19:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, your pages don't have WP:Categories or WP:Short descriptions. These are typically added when the page goes through the AfC process, which you have bypassed. It's okay to bypass, just ensure you are doing proper cleanup on all the articles you create. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 19:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello TableSalt43! Your additions to Battle of Caenina have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. If you have similarly used other copyrighted material on your other newly-created articles, can you revisit those now and remove any such violations? They will also need to be flagged for revision deletion, to remove them from the page histories. It would be helpful if you could list any affected articles here. Thank you. BastunĖġáḍβべーたáś₮ŭŃ! 20:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Actually, you're not a new user, and have already received at least four warnings for copyright violations. That being the case:   There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BastunĖġáḍβべーたáś₮ŭŃ! 21:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for a period of 1 week for copyright and attribution problems. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Battle of Alba Longa for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Alba Longa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Alba Longa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ifly6 (talk) 21:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Timeline of Roman Kingdom

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timeline of Roman Kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Antemnae

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Antemnae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Crustumerium

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Crustumerium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Antho (daughter of Amulius)

edit

  Hello, TableSalt43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antho (daughter of Amulius), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Timeline of Roman Kingdom

edit
 

Hello, TableSalt43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Timeline of Roman Kingdom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply