(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
User talk:Tinucherian/Archives/2011/June - Wikipedia

User talk:Tinucherian/Archives/2011/June


WP:FILM May 2011 newsletter

--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 01:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Politicians arrested and charges with corruption

You are invited for discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 June 1 and Category talk:Politicians arrested and charges with corruption- . Shlok talk . 17:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations Tinu. Very nice! http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?272101 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImpuMozhi (talkcontribs)

Thanks ImpuMozhi :) -- Tinu Cherian - 04:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

 

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Mail

 
Hello, Tinucherian/Archives/2011. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

UOJComm (talk) 05:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks , I will reply soon -- Tinu Cherian - 05:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

Help needed :)

Kindly Assess and help remove the Notability issue from this page of University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UIET Anshul Kashyap (talk) 22:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Anna chandy judge.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anna chandy judge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 11:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

WikiCup 2011 June newsletter

 

We are half way through 2011, and entering the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; the semi-finals are upon us! Points scored in the interim (29/30 June) may be counted towards next round, but please do not update your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. 16 contestants remain, and all have shown dedication to the project to reach this far. Our round leader was   Casliber (submissions) who, among other things, successfully passed three articles through featured article candidates and claimed an impressive 29 articles at Did You Know, scoring 555 points. Casliber led pool D. Pool A was led by   Wizardman (submissions), claiming points for a featured article, a featured list and seven good article reviews, while pool C was led by   Eisfbnore (submissions), who claimed for two good articles, ten articles at Did You Know and four good article reviews. They scored 154 and 118 respectively. Pool B was by far our most competitive pool; six of the eight competitors made it through to round 4, with all of them scoring over 100 points. The pool was led by   Hurricanehink (submissions), who claimed for, among other things, three featured articles and five good articles. In addition to the four pool leaders, 12 others (the four second places, and the 8 next highest overall) make up our final 16. The lowest scorer who reached round 4 scored 76 points; a significant increase on the 41 needed to reach round 3. Eight of our semi-finalists scored at least twice as much as this.

No points were awarded this round for featured pictures, good topics or In the News, and no points have been awarded in the whole competition for featured topics, featured portals or featured sounds. Instead, the highest percentage of points has come from good articles. Featured articles, despite their high point cost, are low in number, and so, overall, share a comparable number of points with Did You Know, which are high in number but low in cost. A comparatively small but still considerable number of points come from featured lists and good article reviews, rounding out this round's overall scores.

We would again like to thank   Jarry1250 (submissions) and   Stone (submissions) for invaluable background work, as well as all of those helping to provide reviews for the articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please do keep using it, and please do help by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup.

Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here, for those interested, though it appears that neither are completely accurate at this time. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)