Vanjagenije
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~ Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere. Thank you! Vanjagenije (talk) |
|
Speedy deletion nomination of File:When You Gonna Learn single.jpg
editA tag has been placed on File:When You Gonna Learn single.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 21:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail
editIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Doug Weller talk 18:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Syed Zafrul Hasan Rizvi for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syed Zafrul Hasan Rizvi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Zafrul Hasan Rizvi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nova Sintra Album.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Nova Sintra Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Genocide Bar and Chetnik War Crimes
editHi, I undid your edit for Chetnik War Crimes as it seems you may have inadvertently removed a bunch of sourced content. I assume your aim was to remove the Genocide Bar however looking now, it seems only recently all listed genocides were removed from it and an edit war is taking place. I see on its talk page a call for an RFC is requested so perhaps it is best to wait for the final stable version? Until then, I think Bosnian Genocide, Genocide of Serbs in Independence State of Croatia, and Chetnik War Crimes During WWII and so on should still keep that side bar until editors make up their mind over the bar’s format. Otherwise it will just go back and forth for all these articles on a given day. Cheers. OyMosby (talk) 13:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @OyMosby: The bar was only added to the article recently [1] by the same user who was edit-warring about the content of the bar. So, if you want to keep status quo, then it should be removed, I think. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- That user wasn’t edit warring there it seems. They added it to the other articles I mentioned on the same day as well. I don’t think timing makes a difference. As for edit waring recently it appears to be a number of different other users. It appears the long standing version of the bar listed all the various genocide articles. The latest version isn’t the stable once, hence why I suggested we wait for the RFC results when consus is reached there? Otherwise should the bar be removed from all articles no longer listed? OyMosby (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, we can wait for the bar to stabilize, I agree. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- That user wasn’t edit warring there it seems. They added it to the other articles I mentioned on the same day as well. I don’t think timing makes a difference. As for edit waring recently it appears to be a number of different other users. It appears the long standing version of the bar listed all the various genocide articles. The latest version isn’t the stable once, hence why I suggested we wait for the RFC results when consus is reached there? Otherwise should the bar be removed from all articles no longer listed? OyMosby (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, some new articles have been tagged with the "Under construction" template but fall under "CSD A2". Should we speedy delete these articles? How should we handle these cases? Thanks! P. ĐĂNG (talk) 04:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @P. ĐĂNG: What are those articles? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delayed response, but the post was deleted and then recreated by another member. If I come across some new articles that fall into such a situation, what should I do? Thank you! P. ĐĂNG (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- My recommendation is not to do anything. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delayed response, but the post was deleted and then recreated by another member. If I come across some new articles that fall into such a situation, what should I do? Thank you! P. ĐĂNG (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
User:السيد مقتدى and their contributions to Draft:Dheyaa al-saad look similar to the above case! Though it seems stale, should I file it? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeraxmoira: If there is no ongoing disruption, there is no reason to make investigations. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LuboneEditors
editThanks for your work on this, but what about Park hue? Wikishovel (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Wikishovel: I don't see any edit from that account. Am I missing something? Vanjagenije (talk) 05:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's a one-edit account that either created or heavily edited Draft:Kefas Brand, which was then moved to draft by User:Adrian Chumachen. Wikishovel (talk) 06:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit, not live nor deleted one. It must be Wikipedia:Oversighted. I don't want to block an account unless I can see some disruption coming form that account. Anyway, if there is only one edit made in March, there is no ongoing disruption, so there is no need to do anything. Vanjagenije (talk) 06:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Vanjagenje, you s-deleted that page that had been recreated by me, and mentioned you were assuming it met G4. Very sorry but that is not the case, as I indicated on Tp (and another admin mentioned (see history)). Since Afd (closed 3 days before release of the film) the page had changed and was substantially different (I had added SEVEN full-length reviews in reliable media, none of them available at the time of the AfD) 2) the status of the subject had obviously changed (notoriety issue is now moot). I am therefore requesting from you that you please kindly restore the article. Thank you in advance. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Mushy Yank: There is nothing at Nunakhuzi to undelete. What is the exact title of the article? Vanjagenije (talk) 00:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. Nunakuzhi, my apologies! Thanks again. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you!-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
SPI request
editSince you checked this before, I'd like to ask your advice. Here, in the very end of the diff, "Minimax regret" tells: We are putting it back.. Who are "we"? I do not really know, but if they are not the same person, then based on their behavior, "Minimax regret" and User:W4r5a7w4r are definitely a case of WP:MEAT, pretty much per WP:DUCK. What should I do? My very best wishes (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion
editHi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to Municipalities and cities of Serbia.
If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref>
and one or more <ref name="foo"/>
referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref>
but left the <ref name="foo"/>
, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/>
with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>
; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.
If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 23:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}}
to your talk page.
- Sorry, it was my error. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)