In projective geometry, a von Staudt conic is the point set defined by all the absolute points of a polarity that has absolute points. In the real projective plane a von Staudt conic is a conic section in the usual sense. In more general projective planes this is not always the case. Karl Georg Christian von Staudt introduced this definition in Geometrie der Lage (1847) as part of his attempt to remove all metrical concepts from projective geometry.
Polarities
editA polarity,
A polarity may or may not have absolute points. A polarity with absolute points is called a hyperbolic polarity and one without absolute points is called an elliptic polarity.[4] In the complex projective plane all polarities are hyperbolic but in the real projective plane only some are.[4]
A classification of polarities over arbitrary fields follows from the classification of sesquilinear forms given by Birkhoff and von Neumann.[5] Orthogonal polarities, corresponding to symmetric bilinear forms, are also called ordinary polarities and the locus of absolute points forms a non-degenerate conic (set of points whose coordinates satisfy an irreducible homogeneous quadratic equation) if the field does not have characteristic two. In characteristic two the orthogonal polarities are called pseudopolarities and in a plane the absolute points form a line.[6]
Finite projective planes
editIf
- a(
π ) = n + 2r√n + 1,
where r is a non-negative integer.[7]
Since a(
R. Baer has shown that if n is odd, the absolute points of an orthogonal polarity form an oval (that is, n + 1 points, no three collinear), while if n is even, the absolute points lie on a non-absolute line.[8]
In summary, von Staudt conics are not ovals in finite projective planes (desarguesian or not) of even order.[9][10]
Relation to other types of conics
editIn a pappian plane (i.e., a projective plane coordinatized by a field), if the field does not have characteristic two, a von Staudt conic is equivalent to a Steiner conic.[11] However, R. Artzy has shown that these two definitions of conics can produce non-isomorphic objects in (infinite) Moufang planes.[12]
Notes
edit- ^ Coxeter 1964, p. 60
- ^ Garner 1979, p. 132
- ^ Coxeter and several other authors use the term self-conjugate instead of absolute.
- ^ a b Coxeter 1964, p. 72
- ^ Birkhoff, G.; von Neumann, J. (1936), "The logic of quantum mechanics", Ann. Math., 37: 823–843
- ^ Barwick, Susan; Ebert, Gary (2008), Unitals in Projective Planes, Springer, pp. 16–18, ISBN 978-0-387-76364-4
- ^ Ball, R.W. (1948), "Dualities of Finite Projective Planes", Duke Mathematical Journal, 15: 929–940, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-48-01581-6
- ^ Baer, Reinhold (1946), "Polarities in Finite Projective Planes", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 52: 77–93, doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1946-08506-7
- ^ Garner 1979, p. 133
- ^ Dembowski 1968, pp. 154–155
- ^ Coxeter 1964, p. 80
- ^ Artzy, R. (1971), "The Conic y = x2 in Moufang Planes", Aequationes Mathematicae, 6: 30–35, doi:10.1007/bf01833234
References
edit- Coxeter, H. S. M. (1964), Projective Geometry, Blaisdell
- Dembowski, Peter (1968), Finite geometries, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 44, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-61786-8, MR 0233275
- Garner, Cyril W L. (1979), "Conics in Finite Projective Planes", Journal of Geometry, 12 (2): 132–138, doi:10.1007/bf01918221
Further reading
edit- Ostrom, T.G. (1981), "Conicoids: Conic-like figures in Non-Pappian planes", in Plaumann, Peter; Strambach, Karl (eds.), Geometry - von Staudt's Point of View, D. Reidel, pp. 175–196, ISBN 90-277-1283-2