(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/23skidoo - Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/23skidoo

< Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

23skidoo edit

Vote here (58/0/0) ending 20:57 October 7, 2005 (UTC)

23skidoo (talk · contribs) – 23skidoo first joined us on January 4, 2003— since then, he has amassed over 11,000 edits [1], nearly 9,000 of which have been to the Article Namespace. He is also a frequent contributor to the daily discussions at Articles for Deletion and other community-related discussions and holds approximately 900 edits in the Wikipedia Namespace. When not helping with Wikipedia, he works as a freelance journalist and book editor which is a definite plus. That said, I believe 23skidoo to be an exceptional candidate for adminship and give him my strongest possible support. Hall Monitor 20:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I'm happy to accept the nomination! Cheers! 23skidoo 00:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Strong support. Pardon the cliché, but I thought he was one already. Hall Monitor 21:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support strong contributor --TimPope 21:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - a consistent contributor who would well wield a mop. -- BD2412 talk 21:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Strong Support I knew he wasn't one, but I never understood why ; - ) Redwolf24 (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support. JYolkowski // talk 22:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support — consestent editor (plus, I trust the nominator). →Journalist >>talk<< 23:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support, good editor. Private Butcher 23:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support, as per nom (hope he accepts...) ≈ jossi ≈ 23:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Very good contributor. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:48, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support. Amazing work on Star Trek-related articles. Acegikmo1 23:51, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Extreme pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcaniconiosic support!Disclaimer: This vote is not intended to be offensive. Additionally, this vote should not be used for controlling operations at a nuclear power plant, bank, airport, or hospital. You may not sue me in a COURT OF LAW in Trenton, New Jersey, for any damages this vote may cause you. --Phroziac(talk) 00:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    ^ lol. →Journalist >>talk<< 01:03, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support, strong editor. K1Bond007 01:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Thumbs up.  Denelson83  01:43, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Great stuff.—encephalon 02:32, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support. Great involvements in both articles and policies, per the nominator. Deryck C. RfA 03:00, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support, great editor. Christopher Parham (talk) 03:12, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. EXTREME LEX LUTHER SUPPORT WITH EXTRA CRYPTONITE!!!!! Ryan Norton T | @ | C 03:28, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. 11,000 edits? Extreme asexual support. --Fire Star 04:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    I think sexual support is higher-end ^^ Deryck C. RfA 04:47, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Extreme Mexican Support. He's done quite a good amount of work here, and has been active in the Wikipedia namespace too. Titoxd 05:54, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support -Greg Asche (talk) 06:03, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support with extra cheese -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 06:14, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Good editor --Rogerd 06:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support CambridgeBayWeather 07:23, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Long-overdue support. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 09:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support, great contributor. Alphax τたうεいぷしろんχかい 10:35, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support KHM03 14:37, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. All types of supports are here – I am tempted to add one more: an Indian support. --Bhadani 14:41, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support. cliché--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 14:53, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Strong Support Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:02, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support - Guettarda 17:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. support this really is long overdue Yuckfoo 19:00, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Wholehearted support Zach (Sound Off) 20:21, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support. He's been on longer than me, and I thought he already was one! Here's my support. :-) --WikiFanaticTalk Contribs 16:06, 1 October 2005 (CDT)
  34. Support. SimonP 00:59, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support. -- JamesTeterenko 05:15, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Thought he was one. --Merovingian (t) (c) 05:29, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support--Cyberjunkie | Talk 05:47, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. So am I allowed to say Extreme lesbian support or am I not? — JIP | Talk 06:47, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support. Very fine contributor. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:55, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Dancing support. That's right, I'm dancing. Coffee 10:22, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support. Thunderbrand 15:11, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. I don't know JIP, but gets my Furry Alien Support. Alf melmac 22:14, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Good User --JAranda | yeah 03:54, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Witty Support Comment Here  ALKIVAR™ 07:11, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support. Michael Warren | Talk 09:54, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Extreme Death phoenix Support. {{cliché}} Give him the mop and bucket already. --Deathphoenix 20:17, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. 23yes. And please tell me what happened to the other 22 skidoo? Radiant_>|< 22:45, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support. El_C 23:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support. Great user name, by the way. PedanticallySpeaking 17:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support. 11,000? That's a whole lot of [edit] 01:44, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Temporarily un-wikibreak-ing to Support. --Alan Au 03:18, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Thought he already was one. Molotov (talk) 05:19, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Cool. --JuntungWu 11:19, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Xoloz 12:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support --Rogerd 03:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  56. S'port good guy (and I like bandwaggons) --Doc (?) 10:52, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support very active. Dlyons493 Talk 12:39, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support. Jayjg (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I need to do a bit more research on that. Probably many of the same things I've been working on in the past. 23skidoo 00:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I've been quite pleased with the series of articles K1Bond007 and I have put together relating to the James Bond novels. There's still plenty of work to do but I like how that group of articles have turned out. Also, because of my own personal knowledge of the subject I'm quite happy with the article on Rock Around the Clock which I reworked. 23skidoo 00:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Occasionally I get a little put out if someone takes the letter of the law too literally or assumes all articles are like comparing apples to apples, but on the whole things have moved fairly smoothly around here for me. 23skidoo 00:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/23skidoo&oldid=1126796293"