Richard Lindzen: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 03:5403:54, 27 August 2009‎ Ratel talk contribs‎ 24,976 bytes +45‎ Undid revision 310295840 by A Prose Narrative (talk) undo
curprev 03:1803:18, 27 August 2009‎ A Prose Narrative talk contribs‎ 24,931 bytes −45‎ Removed extraneous connection to Exxon. Many universities also accept funds from oil companies, and we don't directly associate all of the faculty with the donor company. undo

curprev 10:4610:46, 25 August 2009‎ Splette talk contribs‎ 24,976 bytes +185‎ Undid revision 309949007 by JG17 (talk) undo unexplained removal of sourced content undo
curprev 10:2010:20, 25 August 2009‎ JG17 talk contribs‎ 24,791 bytes −185‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 06:4406:44, 22 August 2009‎ Hebrides talk contribs‎ m 24,976 bytes −236‎ clean up using AWB undo

curprev 04:0004:00, 19 August 2009‎ Enoent talk contribs‎ m 25,212 bytes 0‎ →‎External links: Fixed wrong linktext, typo in other link undo

curprev 06:1906:19, 11 August 2009‎ Ratel talk contribs‎ 25,226 bytes +2,533‎ Reverted to revision 307003923 by Nishkid64; Take to Talk, this is well sourced. (TW) undo
curprev 05:0105:01, 11 August 2009‎ Vertpox talk contribs‎ 22,693 bytes −2,533‎ Bold edit: this section is not appropriate...we would need to include sections for every professor who has ever consulted. Also, violation of WP:BLP and WP:POV undo

curprev 17:2417:24, 9 August 2009‎ Nishkid64 talk contribs‎ m 25,226 bytes 0‎ Protected Richard Lindzen: Sockpuppetry abuse. ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 17:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 17:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC))) undo
curprev 08:4308:43, 9 August 2009‎ Ratel talk contribs‎ m 25,226 bytes −53‎ Reverted edits by A Wierd and Wonderful World (talk) to last version by Oren0 undo
curprev 08:1008:10, 9 August 2009‎ A Wierd and Wonderful World talk contribs‎ 25,279 bytes +53‎ Violation of WP:POV and WP:BLP undo
curprev 02:3502:35, 9 August 2009‎ Oren0 talk contribs‎ 25,226 bytes −53‎ →‎Consulting fees and Funding sources of other organizations: Tweak language. The source only lists him as a "contributor" to these think tanks rather than a member. Also, these two only have Exxon listed, not Chrysler. undo

curprev 10:2210:22, 4 August 2009‎ KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs‎ 24,991 bytes +99‎ Reverted to revision 305309760 by Brian A Schmidt; rv citing WP:BURDEN is rather odd here. Since the Frontline article states this quite clearly... Now it may be undue weight (or something else) but the "burd undo
curprev 07:3907:39, 4 August 2009‎ Alexh19740110 talk contribs‎ 24,892 bytes −99‎ Reverted to revision 305002726 by Alexh19740110; pls see WP:PROVEIT; burden of proof is on the editor including negative material. see talk.. (TW) undo

curprev 18:2018:20, 31 July 2009‎ Brian A Schmidt talk contribs‎ 24,991 bytes +99‎ Undid revision 305002726 by Alexh19740110 (talk)relevant info similar to that in prev paragraph undo

curprev 03:0603:06, 30 July 2009‎ Alexh19740110 talk contribs‎ 24,892 bytes −99‎ mv "Cato" and "Marshall Institute" to career section; rm mention of accepting money from Exxon, more relevant to the Exxon article. See talk. undo

curprev 11:5711:57, 26 July 2009‎ Alexh19740110 talk contribs‎ 24,991 bytes +8‎ →‎Media appearances: - fix remark misattributed as direct quote to Gray; style, punctuation, reword. BTW would support readding "views of other scientists" section for this material. undo
curprev 03:3303:33, 26 July 2009‎ Enescot talk contribs‎ 24,983 bytes +37‎ →‎Media appearances: redirected links for William Gray and John Wallace to the correct Wikipedia articles undo
curprev 00:4900:49, 26 July 2009‎ Enescot talk contribs‎ 24,946 bytes +4,804‎ Wrote more on Lindzen's contributions to mainstream media publications, and what other scientists think about Lindzen's views. Sources are the New York Times, Newsweek, and Spiegel undo

curprev 16:4916:49, 23 July 2009‎ Oren0 talk contribs‎ 20,142 bytes −6,715‎ →‎Views of other scientists: Removing section again. There has still been no explanation how a section with zero secondary sources could possibly carry WP:WEIGHT. See talk. undo
curprev 10:5610:56, 23 July 2009‎ Alexh19740110 talk contribs‎ 26,857 bytes +608‎ →‎Views of other scientists: -- restored some context to Houghton's quotes. undo

curprev 21:2021:20, 22 July 2009‎ KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs‎ 26,249 bytes −16‎ →‎See also: cut Exxon see also. What on Earth is that supposed to mean... (collateral damage from reverts) undo
curprev 10:1310:13, 22 July 2009‎ KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs‎ 26,265 bytes +6,122‎ Reverted to revision 303476293 by Raul654; rv Schneider and Houghton are the connecting refs, there is no SYN. WV Feedback and sensitivity *is* Lindzen's major arguments!. using TW undo
curprev 05:4205:42, 22 July 2009‎ Alexh19740110 talk contribs‎ 20,143 bytes −15‎ →‎See also: - rm "see also ExxonMobil" -- is this someone's idea of a joke? undo
curprev 05:4105:41, 22 July 2009‎ Alexh19740110 talk contribs‎ 20,158 bytes −6,107‎ Reverted to revision 303371644 by Oren0; Oren0 & I have given numerous reasons including BLP, pls discuss on talk.. (TW) undo