Team Fortress 2 Classic: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

8 May 2024

5 April 2024

31 December 2023

23 August 2023

26 June 2023

13 June 2023

10 June 2023

9 June 2023

3 June 2023

30 May 2023

28 May 2023

26 May 2023

30 April 2023

28 April 2023

26 April 2023

25 April 2023

5 April 2023

27 March 2023

9 March 2023

27 November 2022

19 November 2022

25 October 2022

  • curprev 11:0311:03, 25 October 2022Sappho sappho talk contribs 7,938 bytes +98 No edit summary undo
  • curprev 05:0605:06, 25 October 2022Thequiettortoise talk contribs 7,840 bytes +71 I don't see how you're in any place to say what Eminoma currently is or isn't. The entry is plural in case the game has multiple simultaneous developers, not to list every past developer. It would be completely insane to list every lead a game may have had. The information doesn't have to be completely comprehensive to be accurate, it's correct info. I'm not looking to editwar though, here's a compromise that mirrors how other game pages have handled transferred development. undo
  • curprev 04:5704:57, 25 October 2022184.151.190.229 talk 7,769 bytes +50 Except it isn't a fluid name. And the info box itself says "Developer(s)" which to me indicates its okay to have multiple developers listed. This isn't about "power struggles", this is about providing correct information. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 04:4704:47, 25 October 2022Thequiettortoise talk contribs 7,719 bytes −69 Beyond the semantics of internal power struggles and other historical trivia, it just seems totally unconventional and messy to include in an infobox, when it's already detailed further down in the article. Keep the infobox fields concise and contemporarily relevant. Half of the article is already dedicated to this. And Eminoma, in practice, for the past five years, has just been the fluid team name of all TF2C developers and contributors. undo
  • curprev 03:2703:27, 25 October 2022184.151.190.229 talk 7,788 bytes +77 →‎Development: Elaborating more on how Eminoma was not a team until 2018 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 03:2303:23, 25 October 2022184.151.190.229 talk 7,711 bytes +44 Except for the part where Eminoma is the team that first debuted in 2018. They weren't a team before that. Daniel and myself were the original dev team of the project for the first few years of the projects life and we were not known as Eminoma. This developer history is correct as is. undo Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit

24 October 2022

  • curprev 22:2222:22, 24 October 2022Thequiettortoise talk contribs 7,667 bytes −44 It's not accurate to imply development was transferred from any individuals to Eminoma when Eminoma just came to be a broad team name for every developer that works on it. More accurate and less cumbersome to just list that alone. undo Tag: Reverted

9 September 2022

29 August 2022

3 August 2022

11 June 2022

9 June 2022

1 June 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)