Wikipedia:Child protection: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 361572611 by Jubileeclipman (talk) im not liking the total reverts. i dont think he fudged it except for the email thing. think, edit, improve, rather than reverting |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Pedophilia]] or the advocacy of pedophilia on the English Wikipedia is strictly prohibited. Editors who self-identify as pedophiles or who advocate pedophilia will be blocked indefinitely. Because allegations concerning pedophilia are very serious and can be extremely damaging, all editors must avoid making speculative public accusations. |
[[Pedophilia]] or the advocacy of pedophilia on the English Wikipedia is strictly prohibited. Editors who self-identify as pedophiles or who advocate pedophilia will be blocked indefinitely. Because allegations concerning pedophilia are very serious and can be extremely damaging, all editors must avoid making speculative public accusations. |
||
In clear cases, such as the self-identification of a pedophile, administrators are asked to block the user |
In clear cases, such as the self-identification of a pedophile, administrators are asked to block the user, with a neutral block summary that directs the editor to contact [[WP:ARBCOM|the Arbitration Committee]] via email, and disable talk page editing and the editor's Wikipedia email. The blocking administrator should also notify the Committee as soon as possible. |
||
In less clear-cut cases, such as identification through article edits or discussion comments, users should contact the [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] privately via email at {{NonSpamEmail|arbcom-l|lists.wikimedia.org}}. The Committee will then examine the situation and take the appropriate action. |
|||
In all cases, administrators should use a neutral block summary that directs the blocked editor to contact the Arbitration Committee via email, and disable talk page editing and the editor's Wikipedia email. The blocking administrator should also notify the Committee as soon as possible. Because of the sensitivity of this type of allegation, all editors are asked to remain civil, and make no accusatory comments of any kind. |
|||
Because of the sensitivity of this type of allegation, all editors are asked to remain [[WP:CIVIL|civil]], and make no accusatory comments of any kind. |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
Revision as of 23:32, 11 May 2010
 | This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |
Pedophilia or the advocacy of pedophilia on the English Wikipedia is strictly prohibited. Editors who self-identify as pedophiles or who advocate pedophilia will be blocked indefinitely. Because allegations concerning pedophilia are very serious and can be extremely damaging, all editors must avoid making speculative public accusations.
In clear cases, such as the self-identification of a pedophile, administrators are asked to block the user, with a neutral block summary that directs the editor to contact the Arbitration Committee via email, and disable talk page editing and the editor's Wikipedia email. The blocking administrator should also notify the Committee as soon as possible.
In less clear-cut cases, such as identification through article edits or discussion comments, users should contact the Arbitration Committee privately via email at arbcom-l
lists.wikimedia.org. The Committee will then examine the situation and take the appropriate action.
Because of the sensitivity of this type of allegation, all editors are asked to remain civil, and make no accusatory comments of any kind.