Scholia: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m +{{Authority control}} (4 IDs from Wikidata); WP:GenFixes & cleanup on
Ictinos4 (talk | contribs)
m →‎Important sets of scholia: wikipedia link "Venice"
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Type of comment in the manuscript of an ancient author}}
{{Short description|Type of comment in the manuscript of an ancient author}}
{{distinguish|Scolia (disambiguation){{!}}Scolia|Scoliosis}}
{{Distinguish|Scolia (disambiguation){{!}}Scolia|Scoliosis}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2021}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2021}}


'''Scholia''' (singular '''scholium''' or '''scholion''', from {{lang-grc|σχόλιον}}, "comment, interpretation") are [[grammar|grammatical]], critical, or explanatory comments&nbsp;– original or copied from prior commentaries&nbsp;– which are inserted in the margin of the [[manuscript]] of ancient authors, as [[gloss (annotation)|glosses]]. One who writes scholia is a '''scholiast''' (not to be confused with a [[wikt:sciolist|sciolist]]). The earliest attested use of the word dates to the 1st century BC.<ref>
'''Scholia''' ({{singular}}: '''scholium''' or '''scholion''', from {{lang-grc|σχόλιον}}, "comment", "interpretation") are [[grammar|grammatical]], critical, or explanatory comments&nbsp;– original or copied from prior commentaries&nbsp;– which are inserted in the margin of the [[manuscript]] of ancient authors, as [[gloss (annotation)|glosses]]. One who writes scholia is a '''scholiast'''. The earliest attested use of the word dates to the 1st century BC.<ref>
[[Cicero]] ''Ad Atticum'' 16.7.
[[Cicero]] ''Ad Atticum'' 16.7.
</ref>
</ref>
Line 10: Line 10:
[[File:Maass, Ernst – Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem Townleyana, 1887 – BEIC 3064427.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Ernst Maass]], ''Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem Townleyana'' (1887), a collection of scholia of [[Homer]]'s ''[[Iliad]]'']]
[[File:Maass, Ernst – Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem Townleyana, 1887 – BEIC 3064427.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Ernst Maass]], ''Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem Townleyana'' (1887), a collection of scholia of [[Homer]]'s ''[[Iliad]]'']]


Ancient scholia are important sources of information about many aspects of the ancient world, especially ancient [[literary history]]. The earliest scholia, usually anonymous, date to the 5th or 4th century BC (such as the ''scholia minora'' to the ''Iliad''). The practice of compiling scholia continued to late Byzantine times, outstanding examples being Archbishop [[Eustathius of Thessalonica|Eustathius]]' massive commentaries to Homer in the [[Byzantium under the Komnenoi|12th century]] and the ''scholia recentiora'' of [[Thomas Magister]], [[Demetrius Triclinius]] and [[Manuel Moschopoulos]] in the [[Palaeologan Renaissance#Restoration of the Classics|14th]].
Ancient scholia are important sources of information about many aspects of the ancient world, especially ancient [[History of literature|literary history]]. The earliest scholia, usually anonymous, date to the 5th or 4th century BC (such as the ''scholia minora'' to the ''Iliad''). The practice of compiling scholia continued to late Byzantine times, outstanding examples being Archbishop [[Eustathius of Thessalonica|Eustathius]]' massive commentaries to Homer in the [[Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty|12th century]] and the ''scholia recentiora'' of [[Thomas Magister]], [[Demetrius Triclinius]] and [[Manuel Moschopoulos]] in the [[Palaeologan Renaissance#Restoration of the Classics|14th]].


Scholia were altered by successive copyists and owners of the manuscript, and in some cases, increased to such an extent that there was no longer room for them in the margin, and it became necessary to make them into a separate work. At first, they were taken from one commentary only, and subsequently from several. This is indicated by the repetition of the [[Headword|lemma]] ("headword"), or by the use of such phrases as "or thus", "alternatively", "according to some", to introduce different explanations, or by the explicit quotation of different sources.
Scholia were altered by successive copyists and owners of the manuscript, and in some cases, increased to such an extent that there was no longer room for them in the margin, and it became necessary to make them into a separate work. At first, they were taken from one commentary only, and subsequently from several. This is indicated by the repetition of the [[Headword|lemma]] ("headword"), or by the use of such phrases as "or thus", "alternatively", "according to some", to introduce different explanations, or by the explicit quotation of different sources.
Line 16: Line 16:
== Important sets of scholia ==
== Important sets of scholia ==
===Greek===
===Greek===
The most important are those on the [[Homer]]ic ''[[Iliad]]'', especially those found in the 10th-century manuscripts discovered by [[Jean-Baptiste-Gaspard d'Ansse de Villoison|Villoison]] in 1781 in the [[Biblioteca Marciana]] in Venice (see further [[Venetus A]], [[Homeric scholarship]]), which are based on [[Aristarchus of Samothrace|Aristarchus]] and his school.<ref>J E Sandys, ''A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' (London 1894) p. 65</ref> The scholia on [[Hesiod]], [[Pindar]], [[Sophocles]], [[Aristophanes]] and [[Apollonius Rhodius]] are also extremely important.{{citation needed|date=August 2020}}
The most important are those on the [[Homer]]ic ''[[Iliad]]'', especially those found in the 10th-century manuscripts discovered by [[Jean-Baptiste-Gaspard d'Ansse de Villoison|Villoison]] in 1781 in the [[Biblioteca Marciana]] in [[Venice]] (see further [[Venetus A]], [[Homeric scholarship]]), which are based on [[Aristarchus of Samothrace|Aristarchus]] and his school.<ref>J E Sandys, ''A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' (London 1894) p. 65</ref> The scholia on [[Hesiod]], [[Pindar]], [[Sophocles]], [[Aristophanes]] and [[Apollonius of Rhodes|Apollonius Rhodius]] are also extremely important.{{citation needed|date=August 2020}}


===Latin===
===Latin===
In [[Latin]], the most important are those of [[Maurus Servius Honoratus|Servius]] on [[Virgil]];<ref>J E Sandys, ''A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' (London 1894) p. 683</ref> of [[Acro (scholiast)|Acro]] and [[Pomponius Porphyrio|Porphyrio]] on [[Horace]];<ref>A Palmer, ''The Satires of Horace'' (London 1920) p. xxxvii</ref> and of [[Aelius Donatus|Donatus]] on [[Terence]].<ref>J E Sandys, ''A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' (London 1894) p. 197</ref>
In [[Latin]], the most important are those of [[Servius the Grammarian|Servius]] on [[Virgil]];<ref>J E Sandys, ''A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' (London 1894) p. 683</ref> of [[Helenius Acron|Acro]] and [[Pomponius Porphyrion|Porphyrio]] on [[Horace]];<ref>A Palmer, ''The Satires of Horace'' (London 1920) p. xxxvii</ref> and of [[Aelius Donatus|Donatus]] on [[Terence]].<ref>J E Sandys, ''A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities'' (London 1894) p. 197</ref>
Also of interest are the scholia on [[Juvenal]] attached to the good manuscript P;<ref>J D Duff, ''Fourteen Satires of Juvenal'' (Cambridge 1925) p. xliii</ref> while there are also scholia on [[Statius]],<ref>R Sweeny, ''Prolegomena to an Edition of Scholia on Statius'' (1969) p. 2-8</ref> especially associated with the name [[Lactantius Placidus]].<ref>H J Rose, ''A Handbook of Latin Literature'' (1967) p. 483</ref>
Also of interest are the scholia on [[Juvenal]] attached to the good manuscript P;<ref>J D Duff, ''Fourteen Satires of Juvenal'' (Cambridge 1925) p. xliii</ref> while there are also scholia on [[Statius]],<ref>R Sweeny, ''Prolegomena to an Edition of Scholia on Statius'' (1969) p. 2-8</ref> especially associated with the name [[Lactantius Placidus]].<ref>H J Rose, ''A Handbook of Latin Literature'' (1967) p. 483</ref>


Line 25: Line 25:
Some ancient scholia are of sufficient quality and importance to be labelled "commentaries" instead. The existence of a commercial translation is often used to distinguish between "scholia" and "commentaries". The following is a chronological list of ancient commentaries written defined as those for which commercial translations have been made:
Some ancient scholia are of sufficient quality and importance to be labelled "commentaries" instead. The existence of a commercial translation is often used to distinguish between "scholia" and "commentaries". The following is a chronological list of ancient commentaries written defined as those for which commercial translations have been made:


*[[Asconius]] ({{Circa|55 AD}}) on [[Cicero]]'s ''Pro Scauro'', ''In Pisonem'', ''[[Pro Milone]]'', ''Pro Cornelio'' and ''[[In Toga Candida]]''
*[[Asconius Pedianus|Asconius]] ({{circa|55 AD}}) on [[Cicero]]'s ''Pro Scauro'', ''In Pisonem'', ''[[Pro Milone]]'', ''Pro Cornelio'' and ''[[In Toga Candida]]''
*[[Maurus Servius Honoratus|Servius]] (c. 400 AD) on [[Virgil]]'s ''[[Aeneid]]''
*[[Servius the Grammarian|Servius]] ({{circa|400}} AD) on [[Virgil]]'s ''[[Aeneid]]''
*[[Macrobius]] (c. 400 AD) on [[Cicero]]'s ''[[Dream of Scipio]]''
*[[Macrobius]] ({{circa|400}} AD) on [[Cicero]]'s ''[[Somnium Scipionis|Dream of Scipio]]''
*[[Proclus]] (c. 440 AD) on [[Plato]]'s ''[[Parmenides (dialogue)|Parmenides]]'' and ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' and [[Euclid's Elements|Euclid's ''Elements'']]
*[[Proclus]] ({{circa|440}} AD) on [[Plato]]'s ''[[Parmenides (dialogue)|Parmenides]]'' and ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' and [[Euclid's Elements|Euclid's ''Elements'']]
*[[Boethius]] (c. 520 AD) on [[Cicero]]'s ''Topics''
*[[Boethius]] ({{circa|520}} AD) on [[Cicero]]'s ''Topics''


== Other uses ==
== Other uses ==
* [[Benedict Spinoza]] provided his own scholia to many of the propositions in his ''[[Ethics (Spinoza)|Ethics]]'', commentaries upon and expansions of the individual propositions, or sometimes short conclusions to sections of argumentation running over a number of propositions.
* [[Baruch Spinoza|Benedict Spinoza]] provided his own scholia to many of the propositions in his ''[[Ethics (Spinoza book)|Ethics]]'', commentaries upon and expansions of the individual propositions, or sometimes short conclusions to sections of argumentation running over a number of propositions.
* In modern mathematics texts, scholia are marginal notes which may amplify a line of reasoning or compare it with proofs given earlier. A famous example is [[Thomas Bayes|Bayes]]' scholium, in which he presents a justification for assuming a [[continuous uniform distribution]] for the [[Prior distribution|prior]] of the parameter of a [[Bernoulli process]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Murray, F. H. |title=Note on a scholium of Bayes |journal=[[Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society]] |date=February 1930 |url=https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.bams/1183493827 |access-date=3 January 2018 |number=2 |pages=129–132 |publisher=American Mathematical Society |volume=36 |doi=10.1090/s0002-9904-1930-04907-1|doi-access=free }}</ref> Another famous example of a somewhat different use is to be found in [[Brook Taylor]]'s ''Methodus Incrementorum'', in which the propositions demonstrated are often followed by a scholium which further explains the significance of the proposition.
* In modern mathematics texts, scholia are marginal notes which may amplify a line of reasoning or compare it with proofs given earlier. A famous example is [[Thomas Bayes|Bayes]]' scholium, in which he presents a justification for assuming a [[continuous uniform distribution]] for the [[Prior probability|prior]] of the parameter of a [[Bernoulli process]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Murray, F. H. |title=Note on a scholium of Bayes |journal=[[Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society]] |date=February 1930 |url=https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.bams/1183493827 |access-date=3 January 2018 |number=2 |pages=129–132 |publisher=American Mathematical Society |volume=36 |doi=10.1090/s0002-9904-1930-04907-1|doi-access=free }}</ref> Another famous example of a somewhat different use is to be found in [[Brook Taylor]]'s ''Methodus Incrementorum'', in which the propositions demonstrated are often followed by a scholium which further explains the significance of the proposition.
* ''Scholia'' is an academic journal in the field of [[classical studies]].<ref>[http://www.otago.ac.nz/Classics/scholia/ ''Scholia''], [http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/ ''Scholia'' reviews] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010701084036/http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/ |date=1 July 2001 }}</ref>
* ''Scholia'' is an academic journal in the field of [[Classics|classical studies]].<ref>[http://www.otago.ac.nz/Classics/scholia/ ''Scholia''], [http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/ ''Scholia'' reviews] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010701084036/http://www.classics.und.ac.za/reviews/ |date=1 July 2001 }}</ref>
* Search engine relying on [[wikidata]], mainly for scientific publications: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/scholia/ Scholia]
* Search engine relying on [[wikidata]], mainly for scientific publications: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/scholia/ Scholia].
* [[Nicolás Gómez Dávila]] was one of the most radical critics of modernity whose work consists almost entirely of aphorisms which he called "escolios" ("glosses") of an implicit text.
* [[Nicolás Gómez Dávila]] was one of the most radical critics of modernity whose work consists almost entirely of aphorisms which he called "escolios" ("glosses") of an implicit text.
* In each of Bill Blackbeard's ''[[Krazy Kat]]'' Sunday strip collections, the back of the book includes an Ignatz Mouse Debaffler Page: a page of notes that clarify references that have faded into obscurity or may otherwise require explanation. When a strip has a scholium about it, the lower outer corner of the page is marked with the likeness of Ignatz.


==See also==
==See also==
*{{wiktionary-inline|scholium}}
* {{wiktionary-inline|scholium}}
*[[Marginalia]]
* [[Marginalia]]


== References ==
== References ==

Latest revision as of 08:56, 25 April 2024

Scholia (sg.: scholium or scholion, from Ancient Greek: σχόλιον, "comment", "interpretation") are grammatical, critical, or explanatory comments – original or copied from prior commentaries – which are inserted in the margin of the manuscript of ancient authors, as glosses. One who writes scholia is a scholiast. The earliest attested use of the word dates to the 1st century BC.[1]

History[edit]

Ernst Maass, Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem Townleyana (1887), a collection of scholia of Homer's Iliad

Ancient scholia are important sources of information about many aspects of the ancient world, especially ancient literary history. The earliest scholia, usually anonymous, date to the 5th or 4th century BC (such as the scholia minora to the Iliad). The practice of compiling scholia continued to late Byzantine times, outstanding examples being Archbishop Eustathius' massive commentaries to Homer in the 12th century and the scholia recentiora of Thomas Magister, Demetrius Triclinius and Manuel Moschopoulos in the 14th.

Scholia were altered by successive copyists and owners of the manuscript, and in some cases, increased to such an extent that there was no longer room for them in the margin, and it became necessary to make them into a separate work. At first, they were taken from one commentary only, and subsequently from several. This is indicated by the repetition of the lemma ("headword"), or by the use of such phrases as "or thus", "alternatively", "according to some", to introduce different explanations, or by the explicit quotation of different sources.

Important sets of scholia[edit]

Greek[edit]

The most important are those on the Homeric Iliad, especially those found in the 10th-century manuscripts discovered by Villoison in 1781 in the Biblioteca Marciana in Venice (see further Venetus A, Homeric scholarship), which are based on Aristarchus and his school.[2] The scholia on Hesiod, Pindar, Sophocles, Aristophanes and Apollonius Rhodius are also extremely important.[citation needed]

Latin[edit]

In Latin, the most important are those of Servius on Virgil;[3] of Acro and Porphyrio on Horace;[4] and of Donatus on Terence.[5] Also of interest are the scholia on Juvenal attached to the good manuscript P;[6] while there are also scholia on Statius,[7] especially associated with the name Lactantius Placidus.[8]

List of ancient commentaries[edit]

Some ancient scholia are of sufficient quality and importance to be labelled "commentaries" instead. The existence of a commercial translation is often used to distinguish between "scholia" and "commentaries". The following is a chronological list of ancient commentaries written defined as those for which commercial translations have been made:

Other uses[edit]

  • Benedict Spinoza provided his own scholia to many of the propositions in his Ethics, commentaries upon and expansions of the individual propositions, or sometimes short conclusions to sections of argumentation running over a number of propositions.
  • In modern mathematics texts, scholia are marginal notes which may amplify a line of reasoning or compare it with proofs given earlier. A famous example is Bayes' scholium, in which he presents a justification for assuming a continuous uniform distribution for the prior of the parameter of a Bernoulli process.[9] Another famous example of a somewhat different use is to be found in Brook Taylor's Methodus Incrementorum, in which the propositions demonstrated are often followed by a scholium which further explains the significance of the proposition.
  • Scholia is an academic journal in the field of classical studies.[10]
  • Search engine relying on wikidata, mainly for scientific publications: Scholia.
  • Nicolás Gómez Dávila was one of the most radical critics of modernity whose work consists almost entirely of aphorisms which he called "escolios" ("glosses") of an implicit text.
  • In each of Bill Blackbeard's Krazy Kat Sunday strip collections, the back of the book includes an Ignatz Mouse Debaffler Page: a page of notes that clarify references that have faded into obscurity or may otherwise require explanation. When a strip has a scholium about it, the lower outer corner of the page is marked with the likeness of Ignatz.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Cicero Ad Atticum 16.7.
  2. ^ J E Sandys, A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (London 1894) p. 65
  3. ^ J E Sandys, A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (London 1894) p. 683
  4. ^ A Palmer, The Satires of Horace (London 1920) p. xxxvii
  5. ^ J E Sandys, A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (London 1894) p. 197
  6. ^ J D Duff, Fourteen Satires of Juvenal (Cambridge 1925) p. xliii
  7. ^ R Sweeny, Prolegomena to an Edition of Scholia on Statius (1969) p. 2-8
  8. ^ H J Rose, A Handbook of Latin Literature (1967) p. 483
  9. ^ Murray, F. H. (February 1930). "Note on a scholium of Bayes". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 36 (2). American Mathematical Society: 129–132. doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1930-04907-1. Retrieved 3 January 2018.
  10. ^ Scholia, Scholia reviews Archived 1 July 2001 at the Wayback Machine

Sources[edit]

  • Dickey, Eleanor. Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises. Oxford: OUP for the APA, 2007. ISBN 0-19-531293-7.
  • Reynolds, L.D. and N.G. Wilson. Scribes & Scholars: a Guide to the Transmission of Greek & Latin Literature, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. ISBN 0-19-872146-3.

External links[edit]

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Scholium". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.