Banat Romanian dialect: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
same vandal who keeps adding counterfactual Romanian phonolgy and orthography
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
The Banat dialect differs from the others by the following phonetic particularities:
The Banat dialect differs from the others by the following phonetic particularities:


*The unstressed mid vowels {{IPA|/e, ə, o/}} close to {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|i}}, {{IPAplink|ɨ}}, {{IPAplink|u}}]}}, respectively, and open {{IPA|/a/}} to {{IPAblink|ɜ|ə}}: {{IPA|[pəˈpuk, pliˈkat, ɨŋɡruˈpat]}} for standard ''papùc'', ''plecàt'', ''îngropàt''.
*The unstressed mid vowels {{IPA|/e, ə, o/}} close to {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|i}}, {{IPAplink|ɨ}}, {{IPAplink|u}}]}}, respectively, and open {{IPA|/a/}} to {{IPAblink|ɜ|ə}}: {{IPA|[pəˈpuk, pliˈkat, ɨŋɡruˈpat]}} for standard ''papuc'', ''plecat'', ''îngropat''.
*Dentals {{IPA|/t, d/}} become {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|t͡ɕ|t͡ʃʲ}}, {{IPAplink|d͡ʑ|d͡ʒʲ}}]}}, respectively, and consonants {{IPA|/n, l, r/}} are [[palatalization (phonetics)|palatalized]] when followed by {{IPA|[e, i, e̯a]}}: {{IPA|[d͡ʒʲimiˈnʲat͡sə, ˈfrunt͡ʃʲe, ˈbad͡ʒʲe, ˈvinʲe, ˈlʲemnʲe, ˈmarʲe]}} for ''diminéță'', ''frùnte'', ''bade'', ''vìne'', ''lèmne'', ''màre''.
*Dentals {{IPA|/t, d/}} become {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|t͡ɕ|t͡ʃʲ}}, {{IPAplink|d͡ʑ|d͡ʒʲ}}]}}, respectively, and consonants {{IPA|/n, l, r/}} are [[palatalization (phonetics)|palatalized]] when followed by {{IPA|[e, i, e̯a]}}: {{IPA|[d͡ʒʲimiˈnʲat͡sə, ˈfrunt͡ʃʲe, ˈbad͡ʒʲe, ˈvinʲe, ˈlʲemnʲe, ˈmarʲe]}} for ''dimineață'', ''frunte'', ''bade'', ''vine'', ''lemne'', ''mare''.
*Affricates {{IPA|/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/}} become the palatalized fricatives {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|ɕ|ʃʲ}}, {{IPAplink|ʑ|ʒʲ}}]}}, respectively: {{IPA|[ʃʲas, ˈʃʲinə, ʃʲinʃʲ, ˈfuʒʲe, ˈʒʲinere, ˈsɨnʒʲe]}} for ''ceàs'', ''cínă'', ''cíncĭ'', ''fùge'', ''gínere'', ''sânge''.
*Affricates {{IPA|/t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/}} become the palatalized fricatives {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|ɕ|ʃʲ}}, {{IPAplink|ʑ|ʒʲ}}]}}, respectively: {{IPA|[ʃʲas, ˈʃʲinə, ʃʲinʃʲ, ˈfuʒʲe, ˈʒʲinere, ˈsɨnʒʲe]}} for ''ceas'', ''cină'', ''cinci'', ''fuge'', ''ginere'', ''sânge''.
*In some varieties, the diphthong {{IPA|/o̯a/}} is realized as {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|w}}{{IPAplink|ä|a}}]}}: {{IPA|[ˈswarje, ˈmwart͡ʃʲe]}} for ''soare'', ''moarte''. In other varieties {{IPA|/o̯a/}} becomes the monophthong {{IPAblink|ɔ}}: {{IPA|[ˈkɔʒə, ˈɔlə]}} for ''cójă'', ó''''.
*In some varieties, the diphthong {{IPA|/o̯a/}} is realized as {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|w}}{{IPAplink|ä|a}}]}}: {{IPA|[ˈswarje, ˈmwart͡ʃʲe]}} for ''soare'', ''moarte''. In other varieties {{IPA|/o̯a/}} becomes the monophthong {{IPAblink|ɔ}}: {{IPA|[ˈkɔʒə, ˈɔlə]}} for ''coajă'', ''oală''.
*The stressed vowel {{IPA|/e/}} becomes {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|j}}{{IPAplink|ɛ}}]}} when followed by another {{IPA|[e]}} in the next syllable: {{IPA|[muˈjɛrʲe, ˈfjɛt͡ʃʲe, poˈvjɛstə, ˈvjɛrd͡ʒʲe, ˈpjɛʃt͡ʃʲe]}} for ''muĭère'', ''fètè'', ''povèste'', ''vèrde'', ''pește''.
*The stressed vowel {{IPA|/e/}} becomes {{IPA|[{{IPAplink|j}}{{IPAplink|ɛ}}]}} when followed by another {{IPA|[e]}} in the next syllable: {{IPA|[muˈjɛrʲe, ˈfjɛt͡ʃʲe, poˈvjɛstə, ˈvjɛrd͡ʒʲe, ˈpjɛʃt͡ʃʲe]}} for ''muiere'', ''fete'', ''poveste'', ''verde'', ''pește''.
*After [[labial consonant|labials]], {{IPA|/je/}} reduces to {{IPAblink|e}}: {{IPA|[ˈferʲe, ˈmerkurʲ, ˈpelʲe, pept]}} for ''fiere'', ''mèrcurĭ'', ''pèlè'', ''pèpt''.
*After [[labial consonant|labials]], {{IPA|/je/}} reduces to {{IPAblink|e}}: {{IPA|[ˈferʲe, ˈmerkurʲ, ˈpelʲe, pept]}} for ''fiere'', ''miercuri'', ''piele'', ''piept''.
*After the fricatives {{IPA|[s, z, ʃ, ʒ]}}, affricates {{IPA|[t͡s, d͡z]}}, and the sequence {{IPA|[st]}}, {{IPA|/e/}} becomes {{IPA|[ə]}}, {{IPA|/i/}} becomes {{IPA|[ɨ]}}, and {{IPA|/e̯a/}} reduces to {{IPA|[a]}}: {{IPA|[ˈsarə, səmn, ˈsɨŋɡur, d͡zər, d͡zɨd, pəˈʃɨm, ʃəd, ʒɨr, ʃɨ, koˈʒaskə, ɨnˈt͡sapə, sɨmˈt͡səsk, prəˈʒaskə, povjesˈtəsk, staɡ]}} for ''sàră'', ''sĕmn'', ''sîngur'', ''er'', ''id'', ''pășim'', ''șĕd'', ''jîr'', ''șî'', ''cojéscă'', ''înțépă'', ''simțesc'', ''prĕjéscă'', ''povestĕsc'', ''stég''.
*After the fricatives {{IPA|[s, z, ʃ, ʒ]}}, affricates {{IPA|[t͡s, d͡z]}}, and the sequence {{IPA|[st]}}, {{IPA|/e/}} becomes {{IPA|[ə]}}, {{IPA|/i/}} becomes {{IPA|[ɨ]}}, and {{IPA|/e̯a/}} reduces to {{IPA|[a]}}: {{IPA|[ˈsarə, səmn, ˈsɨŋɡur, d͡zər, d͡zɨd, pəˈʃɨm, ʃəd, ʒɨr, ʃɨ, koˈʒaskə, ɨnˈt͡sapə, sɨmˈt͡səsk, prəˈʒaskə, povjesˈtəsk, staɡ]}} for ''seară'', ''semn'', ''singur'', ''zer'', ''zid'', ''pășim'', ''șed'', ''jir'', ''și'', ''cojească'', ''înțeapă'', ''simțesc'', ''prăjească'', ''povestesc'', ''steag''.
*Labials remain unchanged when followed by {{IPA|[e, i, e̯a]}}: {{IPA|[pept, ˈbivol, oˈbe̯alə, fer, ˈvermʲe, ˈmerkurʲ]}} for ''pèpt'', ''bìvol'', ''obélă'', ''fèr'', ''vèrme'', ''miercuri''.
*Labials remain unchanged when followed by {{IPA|[e, i, e̯a]}}: {{IPA|[pept, ˈbivol, oˈbe̯alə, fer, ˈvermʲe, ˈmerkurʲ]}} for ''piept'', ''bivol'', ''obială'', ''fier'', ''vierme'', ''miercuri''.
*Etymological {{IPA|/n/}} is preserved and palatalized, such as in Latin-origin words where it is followed by {{IPA|[e]}} or {{IPA|[i]}} in hiatus, words with inflection endings in {{IPA|[i]}}, Slavic borrowings with the sequence {{IPA|[nj]}}, as well as Hungarian borrowings with {{IPA|[nʲ]}}: {{IPA|[kunʲ, kəlˈkɨnʲ, kəpəˈtɨnʲ, tu rəˈmɨnʲ, ˈklanʲe, səˈkrinʲ]}} for ''cuĭ'', ''călcăĭ'', ''căpătâĭ'', ''tu rĕmâĭ'' (from Latin {{lang|la|cuneus}}, ''calcaneum'', ''capitaneum'', ''tu remanēs''), ''claie'' (from Slavic *''klanja'', cf. Serbian and Bulgarian ''kladnja''), ''sicriu'' (from Hungarian {{lang|hu|szekrény}}). This phenomenon is distinct from the simple palatalization of {{IPA|/n/}} when followed by a front vowel, which is newer, even though the two phenomena can now appear in very similar contexts: {{IPA|[tu ˈspunʲ]}} contains an etymological {{IPA|[nʲ]}}, whereas {{IPA|[jel ˈspunʲe]}} contains a more recently palatalized {{IPA|[n]}}.<ref>{{cite book|author=Matilda Caragiu-Marioțeanu|title=Compendiu de dialectologie română|language=ro|year=1975|page=172}}</ref>
*Etymological {{IPA|/n/}} is preserved and palatalized, such as in Latin-origin words where it is followed by {{IPA|[e]}} or {{IPA|[i]}} in hiatus, words with inflection endings in {{IPA|[i]}}, Slavic borrowings with the sequence {{IPA|[nj]}}, as well as Hungarian borrowings with {{IPA|[nʲ]}}: {{IPA|[kunʲ, kəlˈkɨnʲ, kəpəˈtɨnʲ, tu rəˈmɨnʲ, ˈklanʲe, səˈkrinʲ]}} for ''cui'', ''călcâi'', ''căpătâi'', ''tu rămâi'' (from Latin {{lang|la|cuneus}}, ''calcaneum'', ''capitaneum'', ''tu remanēs''), ''claie'' (from Slavic *''klanja'', cf. Serbian and Bulgarian ''kladnja''), ''sicriu'' (from Hungarian {{lang|hu|szekrény}}). This phenomenon is distinct from the simple palatalization of {{IPA|/n/}} when followed by a front vowel, which is newer, even though the two phenomena can now appear in very similar contexts: {{IPA|[tu ˈspunʲ]}} contains an etymological {{IPA|[nʲ]}}, whereas {{IPA|[jel ˈspunʲe]}} contains a more recently palatalized {{IPA|[n]}}.<ref>{{cite book|first=Matilda|last=Caragiu Marioțeanu|author-link=Matilda Caragiu Marioțeanu|title=Compendiu de dialectologie română|language=ro|year=1975|page=172}}</ref>
*The voiced affricate {{IPAblink|d͡z}} is preserved in words believed to be of [[Eastern Romance substratum|substrate]] origin: {{IPA|[ˈbrɨnd͡zə, ˈbud͡zə, ɡruˈmad͡zə, mɨnd͡z]}} for ''brânḑă'', ''buḑă'', ''grumaḑ'', ''mânḑ''. It is also preserved in Latin-origin words that contain a {{IPA|/d/}} followed by a long {{IPA|[e]}} or {{IPA|[i]}}, by an inflectional {{IPA|[i]}} or by {{IPA|[e]}} or {{IPA|[i]}} in hiatus: {{IPA|[ˈd͡zəʃʲe, aˈud͡z, ˈfrund͡zə]}} for ''ece'', ''áuḑi'', ''frunḑă'' (Latin: ''decem'', ''audīs'', ''frondea'').
*The voiced affricate {{IPAblink|d͡z}} is preserved in words believed to be of [[Eastern Romance substratum|substrate]] origin: {{IPA|[ˈbrɨnd͡zə, ˈbud͡zə, ɡruˈmad͡zə, mɨnd͡z]}} for ''brânză'', ''buză'', ''grumaz'', ''mânz''. It is also preserved in Latin-origin words that contain a {{IPA|/d/}} followed by a long {{IPA|[e]}} or {{IPA|[i]}}, by an inflectional {{IPA|[i]}} or by {{IPA|[e]}} or {{IPA|[i]}} in hiatus: {{IPA|[ˈd͡zəʃʲe, aˈud͡z, ˈfrund͡zə]}} for ''zece'', ''auzi'', ''frunză'' (Latin: ''decem'', ''audīs'', ''frondea'').
*The monophthong {{IPA|[ɨ]}}: {{IPA|[ˈkɨnʲe, ˈmɨnʲe, ˈpɨnʲe]}} is old. In standard Romanian, the palatalization is anticipated, and a [[metathesis (linguistics)|metathesis]] occurs : ''câne'', ''mâne'', ''pâne'' are best explained as {{IPA|/ˈkɨnʲe/}} > {{IPA|[ˈkɨʲne]}} (anticipation of palatalization).
*The monophthong {{IPA|[ɨ]}}: {{IPA|[ˈkɨnʲe, ˈmɨnʲe, ˈpɨnʲe]}} is old. In standard Romanian, the palatalization is anticipated, and a [[metathesis (linguistics)|metathesis]] occurs : ''câine'', ''mâine'', ''pâine'' are best explained as {{IPA|/ˈkɨnʲe/}} > {{IPA|[ˈkɨʲne]}} (anticipation of palatalization).


===Morphological features===
===Morphological features===


*Feminine [[Romanian nouns|nouns]] ending in ''-ă'' tend to form the plural in ''-i'' instead of ''-e'': ''casă'' – ''cășì'' ("house(s)", compare with standard ''càsă'' – ''case''). This may be explained, in the case of nouns with roots ending in a fricative or an affricate, by the fact that the plural ending ''-e'' would be realized as ''-ă'' (see the phonetic features above), which would produce a [[homonym]]y between singular and plural.
*Feminine [[Romanian nouns|nouns]] ending in ''-ă'' tend to form the plural in ''-i'' instead of ''-e'': ''casă'' – ''căși'' ("house(s)", compare with standard ''casă'' – ''case''). This may be explained, in the case of nouns with roots ending in a fricative or an affricate, by the fact that the plural ending ''-e'' would be realized as ''-ă'' (see the phonetic features above), which would produce a [[homonym]]y between singular and plural.
*Genitives and datives in nouns are often built analytically: ''piciorul de la scaŭn'' ("the chair's leg", compare with ''picòrul scaunului''), ''daŭ apă la cal'' ("I give water to the horse", compare with ''dau apă calului'').
*Genitives and datives in nouns are often built analytically: ''piciorul de la scaun'' ("the chair's leg", compare with ''piciorul scaunului''), ''dau apă la cal'' ("I give water to the horse", compare with ''dau apă calului'').
*The possessive article is invariable: ''a meu'', ''a mea'', ''a mei'', ''a mele'' ("mine", compare with standard ''al meu'', ''a méa'', ''ai mei'', ''ale mele'') as in most Romanian dialects.
*The possessive article is invariable: ''a meu'', ''a mea'', ''a mei'', ''a mele'' ("mine", compare with standard ''al meu'', ''a mea'', ''ai mei'', ''ale mele'') as in most Romanian dialects.
*The simple perfect of [[Romanian verbs|verbs]] is actively used in all persons and numbers, a feature the Banat dialect shares with the western areas of the [[Wallachian dialect]].
*The simple perfect of [[Romanian verbs|verbs]] is actively used in all persons and numbers, a feature the Banat dialect shares with the western areas of the [[Wallachian dialect]].
*The auxiliary verb used for the compound perfect in the 3rd person has the forms ''o'' and ''or'': ''o mĕrs'', ''or mĕrs'' ("he went", "they went", compare with standard ''a mers'', ''au mers'').
*The auxiliary verb used for the compound perfect in the 3rd person has the forms ''o'' and ''or'': ''o mărs'', ''or mărs'' ("he went", "they went", compare with standard ''a mers'', ''au mers'').
*The newer extended conjugation does not replace the older [[Romanian verbs|forms]] in the 1st and 4th conjugation groups: ''el lucră'', é ''înflóre'' ("he works", "it blooms", compare with standard ''el lucréză'', ''ea înflorește'', with ''-izo'' and ''-isko'' suffixes borrowed by Late Latin from Greek).{{citation needed|date=July 2014}}
*The newer extended conjugation does not replace the older [[Romanian verbs|forms]] in the 1st and 4th conjugation groups: ''el lucră'', ''ea înfloare'' ("he works", "it blooms", compare with standard ''el lucrează'', ''ea înflorește'', with ''-izo'' and ''-isko'' suffixes borrowed by Late Latin from Greek).{{citation needed|date=July 2014}}
*In indicative forms of verbs of the 4th conjugation group, homonymy is found between the 1st person singular and the 3rd person plural: ''eu cobòr'', ''ei cobòr'' ("I come down", "they come down", compare with standard ''eu cobòr'', ''ei cobóră'').
*In indicative forms of verbs of the 4th conjugation group, homonymy is found between the 1st person singular and the 3rd person plural: ''eu cobor'', ''ei cobor'' ("I come down", "they come down", compare with standard ''eu cobor'', ''ei coboară'').
*[[Periphrasis]] is used to express the pluperfect: ''am fost avùt'', ''m-àm fost dùs'', ''o fost mâncàt'' ("I had had", "I had gone", "he had eaten", compare with standard ''avusesem'', '' dusesem'', ''mâncase'').
*[[Periphrasis]] is used to express the pluperfect: ''am fost avut'', ''m-am fost dus'', ''o fost mâncat'' ("I had had", "I had gone", "he had eaten", compare with standard ''avusesem'', '' dusesem'', ''mâncase'').
*The negative plural prohibitive (not imperative){{clarify|date=July 2014}} continues the Latin imperfect subjunctive: ''nu fugireț'' (< lat. ''ne fugiretis''), ''nu mâncareț'' ("don't run", don't eat", compare with standard ''nu fugiți'', ''nu mâncați'').
*The negative plural prohibitive (not imperative){{clarify|date=July 2014}} continues the Latin imperfect subjunctive: ''nu fugireț'' (< lat. ''ne fugiretis''), ''nu mâncareț'' ("don't run", don't eat", compare with standard ''nu fugiți'', ''nu mâncați'').
*The auxiliary '''' used in the past subjunctive is variable: ''eu fíu mâncat'', ''tu mâncat'', ''el fíe mâncat'' ("that I / you / he ate", compare with standard ''eu mâncàt'', ''tu fi mâncàt'', ''el fi mâncat'').
*The auxiliary ''fi'' used in the past subjunctive is variable: ''eu fiu mâncat'', ''tu fii mâncat'', ''el fie mâncat'' ("that I / you / he ate", compare with standard ''eu fi mâncat'', ''tu fi mâncat'', ''el fi mâncat'').
*In some areas, the auxiliary verb used to construct the conditional is ''a vré'': ''eu vréș face'', ''tu vréi face'', ''el vré face'' ("I / you / he would do", compare with standard ''eu aș face'', ''tu áĭ face'', ''el ar face''). Sometimes the ''v'' of the auxiliary is dropped: ''reaș'', etc.
*In some areas, the auxiliary verb used to construct the conditional is ''a vrea'': ''eu vreaș face'', ''tu vreai face'', ''el vrea face'' ("I / you / he would do", compare with standard ''eu aș face'', ''tu ai face'', ''el ar face''). Sometimes the ''v'' of the auxiliary is dropped: ''reaș'', etc.
*In south-western areas, under the [[Serbo-Croatian grammar#Aspect|Serbian]] influence, signs of a verbal [[aspect (grammar)|aspect]] are found, relying on the use of prefixes: ''a dogăta'' ("to finish completely", from ''a găta''), ''a ḑĕúità'' ("to forget completely", from ''a uita''), ''a se proînsura'' ("to marry again", from ''a se însura'').
*In south-western areas, under the [[Serbo-Croatian grammar#Aspect|Serbian]] influence, signs of a verbal [[aspect (grammar)|aspect]] are found, relying on the use of prefixes: ''a dogăta'' ("to finish completely", from ''a găta''), ''a zăuita'' ("to forget completely", from ''a uita''), ''a se proînsura'' ("to marry again", from ''a se însura'').


===Lexical particularities===
===Lexical particularities===


*The [[demonstrative]] articles are: ''ăl'', ''a'', ''ăi'', ''ale'' {{IPA|[ˈalʲe]}} (standard ''cel'', '''', ''cei'', ''cèlè'').
*The [[demonstrative]] articles are: ''ăl'', ''a'', ''ăi'', ''ale'' {{IPA|[ˈalʲe]}} (standard ''cel'', ''cea'', ''cei'', ''cele'').
*Specific [[indefinite pronoun]]s and adjectives are found: {{IPA|[ˈaltəʃʲe]}} ("something", standard ''cevà''), {{IPA|[məˈkar ˈʃʲnʲe]}} ("anyone", standard ''oricine''), ''tot natul'' ("each one", ''fiecare'').
*Specific [[indefinite pronoun]]s and adjectives are found: {{IPA|[ˈaltəʃʲe]}} ("something", standard ''ceva''), {{IPA|[məˈkar ˈʃʲnʲe]}} ("anyone", standard ''oricine''), ''tot natul'' ("each one", ''fiecare'').
*Other specific words: ''șcĕtulă'' ("box", standard ''cutie''), ''șnaidăr'' ("tailor", ''croitor''), ''ai'' ("garlic", ''usturoi''), ''farbă'' ("dye", ''vopsé''), ''golumb'' ("pigeon", ''porumbel''), ''coḑeci'' ("measles", ''pojàr''), etc.
*Other specific words: ''șcătulă'' ("box", standard ''cutie''), ''șnaidăr'' ("tailor", ''croitor''), ''ai'' ("garlic", ''usturoi''), ''farbă'' ("dye", ''vopsea''), ''golumb'' ("pigeon", ''porumbel''), ''cozeci'' ("measles", ''pojar''), etc.


===Sample===
===Sample===

Latest revision as of 18:14, 30 April 2024

The Banat dialect (subdialectul / graiul bănățean) is one of the dialects of the Romanian language (Daco-Romanian). Its geographic distribution extends over the Romanian Banat and parts of the Serbian Banat, but also in parts of the Timok Valley of Serbia.

The Banat dialect is a member of the northern grouping of Romanian dialects, along with the Moldavian dialect and the group of Transylvanian varieties. Features of the Banat dialect are found in southern dialects of Romanian: Aromanian, Megleno-Romanian, and Istro-Romanian.

The Banat dialect has been long classified separately from the Transylvanian varieties, but in early studies such as those by Mozes Gaster[1] these were sometimes grouped together as a single variety. The Banat dialect was considered separately by Heimann Tiktin, Gustav Weigand, Sextil Pușcariu (in his latter studies), Emil Petrovici, Romulus Todoran, Ion Coteanu, Alexandru Philippide, Iorgu Iordan, and others.

Geographic distribution[edit]

The dialect is spoken in southwestern Romania, in the following counties: Caraș-Severin, Timiș, the southern part of Arad, and the southern part of Hunedoara. It is also spoken in the Serbian Banat and in the Timok Valley of Serbia.

Transition areas[edit]

A transition area towards the Wallachian dialect is found in the northwestern of Oltenia, in the counties of Gorj and Mehedinți. Mixtures with the southern and central Transylvanian varieties are found in northeastern parts of Banat, where such a transition area is in the Hațeg Country and another one extends towards southern Crișana.

Particularities[edit]

Phonetic features[edit]

The Banat dialect differs from the others by the following phonetic particularities:

  • The unstressed mid vowels /e, ə, o/ close to [i, ɨ, u], respectively, and open /a/ to [ə]: [pəˈpuk, pliˈkat, ɨŋɡruˈpat] for standard papuc, plecat, îngropat.
  • Dentals /t, d/ become [t͡ʃʲ, d͡ʒʲ], respectively, and consonants /n, l, r/ are palatalized when followed by [e, i, e̯a]: [d͡ʒʲimiˈnʲat͡sə, ˈfrunt͡ʃʲe, ˈbad͡ʒʲe, ˈvinʲe, ˈlʲemnʲe, ˈmarʲe] for dimineață, frunte, bade, vine, lemne, mare.
  • Affricates /t͡ʃ, d͡ʒ/ become the palatalized fricatives [ʃʲ, ʒʲ], respectively: [ʃʲas, ˈʃʲinə, ʃʲinʃʲ, ˈfuʒʲe, ˈʒʲinere, ˈsɨnʒʲe] for ceas, cină, cinci, fuge, ginere, sânge.
  • In some varieties, the diphthong /o̯a/ is realized as [wa]: [ˈswarje, ˈmwart͡ʃʲe] for soare, moarte. In other varieties /o̯a/ becomes the monophthong [ɔ]: [ˈkɔʒə, ˈɔlə] for coajă, oală.
  • The stressed vowel /e/ becomes [jɛ] when followed by another [e] in the next syllable: [muˈjɛrʲe, ˈfjɛt͡ʃʲe, poˈvjɛstə, ˈvjɛrd͡ʒʲe, ˈpjɛʃt͡ʃʲe] for muiere, fete, poveste, verde, pește.
  • After labials, /je/ reduces to [e]: [ˈferʲe, ˈmerkurʲ, ˈpelʲe, pept] for fiere, miercuri, piele, piept.
  • After the fricatives [s, z, ʃ, ʒ], affricates [t͡s, d͡z], and the sequence [st], /e/ becomes [ə], /i/ becomes [ɨ], and /e̯a/ reduces to [a]: [ˈsarə, səmn, ˈsɨŋɡur, d͡zər, d͡zɨd, pəˈʃɨm, ʃəd, ʒɨr, ʃɨ, koˈʒaskə, ɨnˈt͡sapə, sɨmˈt͡səsk, prəˈʒaskə, povjesˈtəsk, staɡ] for seară, semn, singur, zer, zid, pășim, șed, jir, și, cojească, înțeapă, simțesc, prăjească, povestesc, steag.
  • Labials remain unchanged when followed by [e, i, e̯a]: [pept, ˈbivol, oˈbe̯alə, fer, ˈvermʲe, ˈmerkurʲ] for piept, bivol, obială, fier, vierme, miercuri.
  • Etymological /n/ is preserved and palatalized, such as in Latin-origin words where it is followed by [e] or [i] in hiatus, words with inflection endings in [i], Slavic borrowings with the sequence [nj], as well as Hungarian borrowings with [nʲ]: [kunʲ, kəlˈkɨnʲ, kəpəˈtɨnʲ, tu rəˈmɨnʲ, ˈklanʲe, səˈkrinʲ] for cui, călcâi, căpătâi, tu rămâi (from Latin cuneus, calcaneum, capitaneum, tu remanēs), claie (from Slavic *klanja, cf. Serbian and Bulgarian kladnja), sicriu (from Hungarian szekrény). This phenomenon is distinct from the simple palatalization of /n/ when followed by a front vowel, which is newer, even though the two phenomena can now appear in very similar contexts: [tu ˈspunʲ] contains an etymological [nʲ], whereas [jel ˈspunʲe] contains a more recently palatalized [n].[2]
  • The voiced affricate [d͡z] is preserved in words believed to be of substrate origin: [ˈbrɨnd͡zə, ˈbud͡zə, ɡruˈmad͡zə, mɨnd͡z] for brânză, buză, grumaz, mânz. It is also preserved in Latin-origin words that contain a /d/ followed by a long [e] or [i], by an inflectional [i] or by [e] or [i] in hiatus: [ˈd͡zəʃʲe, aˈud͡z, ˈfrund͡zə] for zece, auzi, frunză (Latin: decem, audīs, frondea).
  • The monophthong [ɨ]: [ˈkɨnʲe, ˈmɨnʲe, ˈpɨnʲe] is old. In standard Romanian, the palatalization is anticipated, and a metathesis occurs : câine, mâine, pâine are best explained as /ˈkɨnʲe/ > [ˈkɨʲne] (anticipation of palatalization).

Morphological features[edit]

  • Feminine nouns ending in tend to form the plural in -i instead of -e: casăcăși ("house(s)", compare with standard casăcase). This may be explained, in the case of nouns with roots ending in a fricative or an affricate, by the fact that the plural ending -e would be realized as (see the phonetic features above), which would produce a homonymy between singular and plural.
  • Genitives and datives in nouns are often built analytically: piciorul de la scaun ("the chair's leg", compare with piciorul scaunului), dau apă la cal ("I give water to the horse", compare with dau apă calului).
  • The possessive article is invariable: a meu, a mea, a mei, a mele ("mine", compare with standard al meu, a mea, ai mei, ale mele) as in most Romanian dialects.
  • The simple perfect of verbs is actively used in all persons and numbers, a feature the Banat dialect shares with the western areas of the Wallachian dialect.
  • The auxiliary verb used for the compound perfect in the 3rd person has the forms o and or: o mărs, or mărs ("he went", "they went", compare with standard a mers, au mers).
  • The newer extended conjugation does not replace the older forms in the 1st and 4th conjugation groups: el lucră, ea înfloare ("he works", "it blooms", compare with standard el lucrează, ea înflorește, with -izo and -isko suffixes borrowed by Late Latin from Greek).[citation needed]
  • In indicative forms of verbs of the 4th conjugation group, homonymy is found between the 1st person singular and the 3rd person plural: eu cobor, ei cobor ("I come down", "they come down", compare with standard eu cobor, ei coboară).
  • Periphrasis is used to express the pluperfect: am fost avut, m-am fost dus, o fost mâncat ("I had had", "I had gone", "he had eaten", compare with standard avusesem, mă dusesem, mâncase).
  • The negative plural prohibitive (not imperative)[clarification needed] continues the Latin imperfect subjunctive: nu fugireț (< lat. ne fugiretis), nu mâncareț ("don't run", don't eat", compare with standard nu fugiți, nu mâncați).
  • The auxiliary fi used in the past subjunctive is variable: eu să fiu mâncat, tu să fii mâncat, el să fie mâncat ("that I / you / he ate", compare with standard eu să fi mâncat, tu să fi mâncat, el să fi mâncat).
  • In some areas, the auxiliary verb used to construct the conditional is a vrea: eu vreaș face, tu vreai face, el vrea face ("I / you / he would do", compare with standard eu aș face, tu ai face, el ar face). Sometimes the v of the auxiliary is dropped: reaș, etc.
  • In south-western areas, under the Serbian influence, signs of a verbal aspect are found, relying on the use of prefixes: a dogăta ("to finish completely", from a găta), a zăuita ("to forget completely", from a uita), a se proînsura ("to marry again", from a se însura).

Lexical particularities[edit]

  • The demonstrative articles are: ăl, a, ăi, ale [ˈalʲe] (standard cel, cea, cei, cele).
  • Specific indefinite pronouns and adjectives are found: [ˈaltəʃʲe] ("something", standard ceva), [məˈkar ˈʃʲnʲe] ("anyone", standard oricine), tot natul ("each one", fiecare).
  • Other specific words: șcătulă ("box", standard cutie), șnaidăr ("tailor", croitor), ai ("garlic", usturoi), farbă ("dye", vopsea), golumb ("pigeon", porumbel), cozeci ("measles", pojar), etc.

Sample[edit]

Banat dialect: [ɨntɨmˈplare̯a o fost aˈʃa luˈvat d͡ʒʲe lant͡s jel mo pus ˈkapũ spiˈnare ʃo pleˈkat ku ˈminʲe d͡ʒʲm pəˈrjɛt͡ʃʲem pəˈrʲɛt͡ʃʲe jam pus ˈmɨnantruŋ kʷorn ˈʃajlaltənˈtralt kʷorn ʃɨ mo trɨnˈt͡ʃʲit ʒos]

Standard Romanian: Întâmplarea a fost așa: l-am luat de lanț. El mi-a pus capu-n spinare și-a plecat cu mine din perete în perete. I-am pus mâna într-un corn și cealaltă într-alt corn și m-a trântit jos.

English translation: "It happened like this: I took (the bull) by the chain. It pushed its head into my back and drove me from a wall to another. I grabbed its horn with one hand and its other horn with another, and it knocked me down."

Subdivisions[edit]

The Banat dialect is further divided into several areas, based on finer distinctions in linguistic facts:

  • south-western varieties, with particularities such as:
    • /ə/ becomes [ɛ]: [fɛˈkut, pɛˈmɨnt] for făcut, pământ;
    • /ʷ/ becomes [v]: [luˈvat] for luat;
    • a verbal aspect appears: am dogătat, am zăuitat, s-a pronsurat (see morphological features above);
  • eastern varieties;
  • northern varieties, where [ɨ] becomes more frontal, between [ɨ] and [i], in words like [rɨd] (in varieties around Lugoj);
  • north-eastern varieties, in the Hațeg Country.

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Mozes Gaster, Chrestomație română, vol. I, Leipzig – București, 1891, pp. XC–CVIII, cited by Vasile Ursan, Despre configurația dialectală a dacoromânei actuale
  2. ^ Caragiu Marioțeanu, Matilda (1975). Compendiu de dialectologie română (in Romanian). p. 172.

Bibliography[edit]