Talk:30 September Movement: Difference between revisions
m rating the page |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(16 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{OnThisDay|date1=2008-09-30|oldid1=242039474|date2=2009-10-01|oldid2=317298627|date3=2010-10-01|oldid3=388034588}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|Cold-War=yes|Southeast-Asian=yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Subtitle change for the Anderson Theory? == |
== Subtitle change for the Anderson Theory? == |
||
The subtitle "A Purely Internal Army Affair: the PKI and the 'Cornell Paper' " is pretty lengthy and rough. Might someone see a more succinct and elegant phrase? [[User:Smilo Don|Smilo Don]] 17:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC) |
The subtitle "A Purely Internal Army Affair: the PKI and the 'Cornell Paper' " is pretty lengthy and rough. Might someone see a more succinct and elegant phrase? [[User:Smilo Don|Smilo Don]] 17:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Film== |
|||
*Surprised this isn't linked yet: ''[[Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI]]''. Considering the role it played in propagating the government's version... — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 04:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== I found an inconsistency with this article == |
|||
This article states that Dipa Nusantra Aidit was killed on November 25. His Wikipedia page claims he was killed on November 22. I do not know which date is correct. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/142.136.18.95|142.136.18.95]] ([[User talk:142.136.18.95|talk]]) 02:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Not precisely coup attempt== |
|||
A great resource is the CIA's official intelligence report [http://www.foia.cia.gov/sites/default/files/document_conversions/14/esau-40.pdf (pdf here)] that was compiled in 1968 and later declassified under the [[Freedom of Information Act|FOIA]]. It states that the term [[coup]] in its common usage (''as an attempted overthrow'') "might be misleading" [http://imgur.com/NPdIhR1 (image)]. It seems laziness or lack of interest in revealing the truth (because they were communists) left many sources poorly put together. Shouldn't this be corrected? [[User:Prinsgezinde|Bataaf van Oranje]] ([[User talk:Prinsgezinde|talk]]) 16:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== 930 |
|||
按照 |
|||
== No evidence that Pki was responsible. Is disputed at best. == |
|||
The responsibility for the coup is actually a matter of historic debate and interpretation. You have different people arguing on who is responsible. But it there is one certainty, the September 30 movement was made up of a group of mid ranking military officers. However to muddy the waters, you had the British keen to blame it on PKI for their own agenda.[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/23/uks-propaganda-leaflets-inspired-1960s-massacre-of-indonesian-communists] Ultimately when you read the article, some argue that the PKI played a significant role in the events leading up to the coup attempt, citing its growing influence and alleged involvement in subversive activities. Others contend that the military and other anti-communist forces used the coup attempt as a pretext to purge the PKI and eliminate political opposition. Ultimately "there is no credible evidence that Sukarno knew about it beforehand, or that the PKI as an organisation or its mass membership were responsible for it". https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/17/slaughter-in-indonesia-britains-secret-propaganda-war So for those constantly not doing research and hastily changing the article into one narrative that's unsourced and unproven. Either stop or discuss here and show your sources. I reverted the article back to the last long standing neutral version.[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=30_September_Movement&diff=prev&oldid=1222321944&title=30_September_Movement&diffonly=1] [[Special:Contributions/49.180.246.45|49.180.246.45]] ([[User talk:49.180.246.45|talk]]) 09:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:52, 5 May 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 30 September Movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 30, 2008, October 1, 2009, and October 1, 2010. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subtitle change for the Anderson Theory?
[edit]The subtitle "A Purely Internal Army Affair: the PKI and the 'Cornell Paper' " is pretty lengthy and rough. Might someone see a more succinct and elegant phrase? Smilo Don 17:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Film
[edit]- Surprised this isn't linked yet: Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI. Considering the role it played in propagating the government's version... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
I found an inconsistency with this article
[edit]This article states that Dipa Nusantra Aidit was killed on November 25. His Wikipedia page claims he was killed on November 22. I do not know which date is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.136.18.95 (talk) 02:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Not precisely coup attempt
[edit]A great resource is the CIA's official intelligence report (pdf here) that was compiled in 1968 and later declassified under the FOIA. It states that the term coup in its common usage (as an attempted overthrow) "might be misleading" (image). It seems laziness or lack of interest in revealing the truth (because they were communists) left many sources poorly put together. Shouldn't this be corrected? Bataaf van Oranje (talk) 16:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
930事件 是 穆 斯林发动的 圣战
[edit]按照
No evidence that Pki was responsible. Is disputed at best.
[edit]The responsibility for the coup is actually a matter of historic debate and interpretation. You have different people arguing on who is responsible. But it there is one certainty, the September 30 movement was made up of a group of mid ranking military officers. However to muddy the waters, you had the British keen to blame it on PKI for their own agenda.[1] Ultimately when you read the article, some argue that the PKI played a significant role in the events leading up to the coup attempt, citing its growing influence and alleged involvement in subversive activities. Others contend that the military and other anti-communist forces used the coup attempt as a pretext to purge the PKI and eliminate political opposition. Ultimately "there is no credible evidence that Sukarno knew about it beforehand, or that the PKI as an organisation or its mass membership were responsible for it". https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/17/slaughter-in-indonesia-britains-secret-propaganda-war So for those constantly not doing research and hastily changing the article into one narrative that's unsourced and unproven. Either stop or discuss here and show your sources. I reverted the article back to the last long standing neutral version.[2] 49.180.246.45 (talk) 09:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (October 2010)
- B-Class Indonesia articles
- High-importance Indonesia articles
- WikiProject Indonesia articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Southeast Asian military history articles
- Southeast Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles