Kamalaśīla: Difference between revisions
Adding category |
→Works: link fix |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|dharma name = |
|dharma name = |
||
|birth_date = {{circa|740 CE}} |
|birth_date = {{circa|740 CE}} |
||
|birth_place = India |
|birth_place = Eastern India |
||
|death_date = {{circa|795 CE}} |
|death_date = {{circa|795 CE}} |
||
|death_place = [[Tibet]] |
|death_place = [[Tibet]] |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|title = |
|title = |
||
|location = |
|location = |
||
|education = |
|education = [[Nalanda]] |
||
|teacher = [[Śāntarakṣita]] |
|teacher = [[Śāntarakṣita]] |
||
|reincarnation of = |
|reincarnation of = |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
{{Buddhism}} |
{{Buddhism}} |
||
{{Tibetan Buddhism}} |
{{Tibetan Buddhism}} |
||
'''Kamalaśīla''' (Skt. Kamalaśīla; Tib. པདྨའི་ངང་ཚུལ་, Pemé Ngang Tsul; Wyl. pad+ma'i ngang tshul)<ref>{{cite web|last1=Shedra|first1=Rigpa|title=Kamalashila|url=http://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Kamalashila|website=Rigpa Wiki|access-date=15 December 2017}}</ref> (c. 740-795) was an Indian Buddhist of [[Nalanda]] [[Mahavihara]] who accompanied [[Śāntarakṣita]] (725–788)<ref>Blumenthal, James (2008). "Śāntarakṣita", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Source: [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/saantarak-sita/] (accessed: 28 February 2009).</ref> to Tibet at the request of [[Trisong Detsen]]. He is considered one of the most important [[Madhyamaka]] authors of late Indian Buddhism although little is known about his life aside from details left in Tibetan sources. |
'''Kamalaśīla''' (Skt. Kamalaśīla; Tib. པདྨའི་ངང་ཚུལ་, Pemé Ngang Tsul; Wyl. pad+ma'i ngang tshul)<ref>{{cite web|last1=Shedra|first1=Rigpa|title=Kamalashila|url=http://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Kamalashila|website=Rigpa Wiki|access-date=15 December 2017}}</ref> (c. 740-795) was an Indian Buddhist of [[Nalanda]] [[Mahavihara]] who accompanied [[Śāntarakṣita]] (725–788)<ref>Blumenthal, James (2008). "Śāntarakṣita", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Source: [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/saantarak-sita/] (accessed: 28 February 2009).</ref> to Tibet at the request of [[Trisong Detsen]]. He is considered one of the most important [[Madhyamaka]] authors of late Indian Buddhism although little is known about his life aside from details left in Tibetan sources. |
||
== |
==Biography== |
||
Much of what we know of Kamalaśīla's life comes from later [[Tibetan Buddhism|Tibetan]] sources which are comparitively late and thefore problematic. |
|||
| ⚫ | Dargyay, ''et al.'' (1977, 1998: p. 7) convey a lineage of transmission and translation of [[Śīla]], [[Sutrayana]] [[Buddhavacana]] and the Six [[Pāramitā]] (viewed principally through the [[Mahayana]] teachings of [[Nagarjuna]]), from India to Tibet ([[pandita (Buddhism)|pandit]] in this context denotes a [[Sanskrit]] scholar): |
||
Tibetan sources refer to him, Santaraksita and [[Jñānagarbha]] as ''rang rgyud shar gsum'' meaning the “three eastern Svātantrikas” indicating their origins from Eastern India.<ref name=Buswell2014>{{cite book |last1=Buswell |first1=Robert |last2=Lopez |first2=Donald |title=The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism |date=2014 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=9780691157863 |pages=411–412 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EGmYDwAAQBAJ}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Woo |first1=Jeson |title=KAMALAŚĪLA ON "YOGIPRATYAKṢA" |journal=Indo-Iranian Journal |date=2005 |volume=48 |issue=1/2 |pages=111–121 |doi=10.1007/s10783-005-8905-6 |jstor=24664089 |s2cid=170809649 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24664089|doi-access=free }}</ref> Little else is provided as to his life prior to travelling to [[Tibet]] aside from that he studied under Santaraksita in [[Nalanda]] and arrived in Tibet at the invitations of King [[Trisong Detsen]] after 788 CE after his teachers death.<ref name=MarksBrill>{{cite journal |last1=Marks |first1=James |title=Kamalaśīla |journal=Brill's Encyclopedia of Buddhism Online |url=https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/ENBO/COM-2039.xml?rskey=fqYeJx&result=1}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | {{quote|The Indian pandits, represented mainly by Śāntarakṣita, Kamalaśīla, and his disciple Ye-śes-dbang-po, form a known group. These scholars were all defenders of the ''Madhyamaka'' school, which is based upon Nāgārjuna's teachings. First of all, however, they taught the ten rules of behaviour of the Buddhist ethics (śīla) and a summary of the teachings according to the canonic [[Sutra|Sūtras]] of the Mahāyāna, as well as the virtuous works of the six ''pāramitās''. These exercises are supposed to lead, in a long seemingly endless way, to the gradual ascent to the acquisition of higher intellectual abilities finally culminating in Buddhahood. This trend was intensified after the debate of bSam-yas had taken place in the years 792 to 794; the exact outcome of this debate is still debatable.<ref>Dargyay, Eva M. (author) & Wayman, Alex (editor) (1977, 1998). ''The Rise of Esoteric Buddhism in Tibet''. Second revised edition, reprint. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt Ltd. Buddhist Tradition Series Vol. 32. {{ISBN|81-208-1579-3}} (paper), p.7</ref>}} |
||
==Debate of Samye== |
===Debate of Samye=== |
||
{{Main|Samye Debate}} |
{{Main|Samye Debate}} |
||
In 793 Trisong Detsen resolved that [[Moheyan]] did not hold the true [[dharma]]. Following intense protests from Moheyan's supporters, Trisong Detsen proposed to settle the matter by sponsoring a debate, the "Council of [[Lhasa]]", although it may actually have taken place at [[Samye]], a considerable distance from Lhasa. Kamalaśila was invited to represent [[Vajrayana]] while Moheyan represented the [[East Mountain Teaching]] of [[Chan Buddhism]]. Most Tibetan sources state that the debate was decided in Kamalaśīla's favour (though many Chinese sources claim Moheyan won)<ref name="Powers3844">Powers 2004, pp. 38–44</ref> and Moheyan was required to leave the country and that all sudden-enlightenment texts were gathered and destroyed by royal decree. This was a pivotal event in the history of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], which would afterward continue to follow the late Indian model with only minor influence from China.{{sfn|Yamaguchi|1997}} Moheyan's teachings were a mixture of the East Mountain Teachings{{refn|group=note|Chinese: |
In 793 Trisong Detsen resolved that [[Moheyan]] did not hold the true [[dharma]]. Following intense protests from Moheyan's supporters, Trisong Detsen proposed to settle the matter by sponsoring a debate, the "Council of [[Lhasa]]", although it may actually have taken place at [[Samye]], a considerable distance from Lhasa. Kamalaśila was invited to represent [[Vajrayana]] while Moheyan represented the [[East Mountain Teaching]] of [[Chan Buddhism]]. Most Tibetan sources state that the debate was decided in Kamalaśīla's favour (though many Chinese sources claim Moheyan won)<ref name="Powers3844">Powers 2004, pp. 38–44</ref> and Moheyan was required to leave the country and that all sudden-enlightenment texts were gathered and destroyed by royal decree. This was a pivotal event in the history of [[Tibetan Buddhism]], which would afterward continue to follow the late Indian model with only minor influence from China.{{sfn|Yamaguchi|1997}} Moheyan's teachings were a mixture of the East Mountain Teachings{{refn|group=note|Chinese: |
||
It is said that following his victory, Kamalasila was murdered by |
It is said that following his victory, Kamalasila was murdered by three butchers who killed him by squeezing his kidneys.<ref name=Buswell2014 />Sources disagree as to whether the killers were assassins hired by Moheyan or non-Buddhists who were against the rise of Buddhism in [[Tibet]].<ref name= MarksBrill /> |
||
===The Cham dance=== |
===The Cham dance=== |
||
There is a [[Cham dance]] that retells the story of the Council of Lhasa related to the teachings of [[Chöd]]. Moheyan is generally depicted as of ample girth, goaded by children.<ref>An iconographic [[thangka]] depiction of Moheyan is held in the SAMA collection and may be seen here {{cite web |url=http://kaladarshan.arts.ohio-state.edu/exhib/sama/arh/pgs/T1016M.html |title= |
There is a [[Cham dance]] that retells the story of the Council of Lhasa related to the teachings of [[Chöd]]. Moheyan is generally depicted as of ample girth, goaded by children.<ref>An iconographic [[thangka]] depiction of Moheyan is held in the SAMA collection and may be seen here {{cite web |url=http://kaladarshan.arts.ohio-state.edu/exhib/sama/arh/pgs/T1016M.html |title=Untitled Document |access-date=2009-06-08 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720154139/http://kaladarshan.arts.ohio-state.edu/exhib/sama/arh/pgs/T1016M.html |archive-date=20 July 2008 |df=dmy-all }} (accessed: 14 January 2008)</ref> Chöd is a product of both the Indian and Chinese transmissions of Buddhism into the [[Himalayas]]. For a discussion of the [[Dunhuang]] fulcrum of the entwined relationship of Chinese and Indian Buddhism see van Schaik and Dalton (2004).<ref>[[Sam van Schaik|van Schaik, Sam]] and Dalton, Jacob (2004). "Where Chan and Tantra Meet: Buddhist Syncretism in Dunhuang" in [[Susan Whitfield|Whitfield, Susan]] (ed) (2004). ''The Silk Road: Trade, Travel, War and Faith''. London: British Library Press. 61–71.</ref> |
||
For simplicity, the Vajrayana transmission may be characterised as "gradual" ({{bo|w=rim gyis 'jug pa}}; Chinese: ''dunwu'') and the Chan as "direct" ({{bo|w=cig car gyi 'jug pa}}; Chinese: ''jianwu'').<ref>van Schaik, Sam (2007). ''The Great Perfection and the Chinese Monk: rNyingmapa defences of Hwashang Mahāyāna in the Eighteenth Century.'' Source: [http://earlytibet.com/author/hashang/#_ftn2] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070829210848/http://earlytibet.com/author/hashang/ |date=29 August 2007 }} (accessed: 14 January 2007)</ref> It needs to be emphasised that this neat [[dichotomy]] in characterisation of these two approaches is only valid for the historical context of the great debate between Kamalaśīla and Moheyan and even then it is still open to [[dialectic]]. |
For simplicity, the Vajrayana transmission may be characterised as "gradual" ({{bo|w=rim gyis 'jug pa}}; Chinese: ''dunwu'') and the Chan as "direct" ({{bo|w=cig car gyi 'jug pa}}; Chinese: ''jianwu'').<ref>van Schaik, Sam (2007). ''The Great Perfection and the Chinese Monk: rNyingmapa defences of Hwashang Mahāyāna in the Eighteenth Century.'' Source: [http://earlytibet.com/author/hashang/#_ftn2] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070829210848/http://earlytibet.com/author/hashang/ |date=29 August 2007 }} (accessed: 14 January 2007)</ref> It needs to be emphasised that this neat [[dichotomy]] in characterisation of these two approaches is only valid for the historical context of the great debate between Kamalaśīla and Moheyan and even then it is still open to [[dialectic]]. |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
The mindstream of Kamalaśīla, upon endeavouring to return to his body, was unable to do so and resorted by necessity to the vacant body of Padampa Sangye.<ref>Thrangu, Khenchen & Klonk, Christoph (translator) & Hollmann, Gaby (editor and annotator) (2006). [http://www.rinpoche.com/teachings/chod.htm Chod – The Introduction & A Few Practices] (accessed: 28 September 2008)</ref> The mindstream of Padampa Sangye continued in this body, and it is in this handsome body that the transmission of Chöd was made to [[Machig Labdrön]], his consort.<ref>Source: [http://lionsroar.name/tantric_glossary.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160130111603/http://lionsroar.name/tantric_glossary.htm |date=30 January 2016 }} (Thursday, 5 November 2007)</ref> |
The mindstream of Kamalaśīla, upon endeavouring to return to his body, was unable to do so and resorted by necessity to the vacant body of Padampa Sangye.<ref>Thrangu, Khenchen & Klonk, Christoph (translator) & Hollmann, Gaby (editor and annotator) (2006). [http://www.rinpoche.com/teachings/chod.htm Chod – The Introduction & A Few Practices] (accessed: 28 September 2008)</ref> The mindstream of Padampa Sangye continued in this body, and it is in this handsome body that the transmission of Chöd was made to [[Machig Labdrön]], his consort.<ref>Source: [http://lionsroar.name/tantric_glossary.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160130111603/http://lionsroar.name/tantric_glossary.htm |date=30 January 2016 }} (Thursday, 5 November 2007)</ref> |
||
==Lineage== |
|||
| ⚫ | Dargyay, ''et al.'' (1977, 1998: p. 7) convey a lineage of transmission and translation of [[Śīla]], [[Sutrayana]] [[Buddhavacana]] and the Six [[Pāramitā]] (viewed principally through the [[Mahayana]] teachings of [[Nagarjuna]]), from India to Tibet ([[pandita (Buddhism)|pandit]] in this context denotes a [[Sanskrit]] scholar): |
||
| ⚫ | {{quote|The Indian pandits, represented mainly by Śāntarakṣita, Kamalaśīla, and his disciple Ye-śes-dbang-po, form a known group. These scholars were all defenders of the ''Madhyamaka'' school, which is based upon Nāgārjuna's teachings. First of all, however, they taught the ten rules of behaviour of the Buddhist ethics (śīla) and a summary of the teachings according to the canonic [[Sutra|Sūtras]] of the Mahāyāna, as well as the virtuous works of the six ''pāramitās''. These exercises are supposed to lead, in a long seemingly endless way, to the gradual ascent to the acquisition of higher intellectual abilities finally culminating in Buddhahood. This trend was intensified after the debate of bSam-yas had taken place in the years 792 to 794; the exact outcome of this debate is still debatable.<ref>Dargyay, Eva M. (author) & Wayman, Alex (editor) (1977, 1998). ''The Rise of Esoteric Buddhism in Tibet''. Second revised edition, reprint. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt Ltd. Buddhist Tradition Series Vol. 32. {{ISBN|81-208-1579-3}} (paper), p.7</ref>}} |
||
==Works== |
==Works== |
||
===Trilogy of ''Stages of Meditation'' (''bhāvanākrama'')=== |
===Trilogy of ''Stages of Meditation'' (''bhāvanākrama'')=== |
||
Kamalaśīla is renowned for writing three texts, all called ''[[Bhāvanākrama]]'' (''Stages of Meditation''), which summarize and build upon aspects of the [[Yogacara]] tradition of [[Asanga]], particularly as pertaining to aspects of meditation practice and mental cultivation ([[bhavana]]).<ref>Adam, Martin T. (2003). [http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=82812¤t_base=GEN01 Meditation and the concept of insight in Kamalaśīla's Bhāvanākramas], Montreal: McGill Univ., Dissertation (includes translations)</ref> The first volume was translated into Classic Chinese.<ref>[http://www.cbeta.org/result/T32/T32n1664.htm |
Kamalaśīla is renowned for writing three texts, all called ''[[Bhāvanākrama]]'' (''Stages of Meditation''), which summarize and build upon aspects of the [[Yogacara]] tradition of [[Asanga]], particularly as pertaining to aspects of meditation practice and mental cultivation ([[bhavana]]).<ref>Adam, Martin T. (2003). [http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=82812¤t_base=GEN01 Meditation and the concept of insight in Kamalaśīla's Bhāvanākramas], Montreal: McGill Univ., Dissertation (includes translations)</ref> The first volume was translated into Classic Chinese.<ref>[http://www.cbeta.org/result/T32/T32n1664.htm |
||
Though they had different purposes, Kamalaśīla’s three Bhāvanākramas can be regarded as counterparts of Wang Xi’s Dunwu Dasheng zhengli jue reflecting one of the protagonists’ arguments and strategy during the controversy.<ref name= MarksBrill /> The Bhāvanākramas can be regarded as one of Kamalaśīla best studied works. All three Bhāvanākramas have been preserved in the [[Madhyamaka]] section of the [[Tengyur]] and translated into English; the Sanskrit and the Tibetan versions of the first Bhāvanākrama have been edited and translated by [[Giuseppe Tucci]]; the Tibetan text of the second Bhāvanākrama has been edited by Goshima in 1983; the third Bhāvanākrama has been translated by [[Étienne Lamotte]].<ref name= MarksBrill /> |
|||
The three Bhāvanākramas are Kamalaśīla’s most influential works on [[meditation]] and there associated practices. All three of the texts overlap with each other and all of them rely on a combination of rational analysis and scriptural citation to establish his understanding of the path of spiritual advancement. Various religious texts are cited in the three Bhāvanākramas including the [[Sandhinirmocana]], Ratnamegha Sutra, [[Samadhiraja Sutra]], [[Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra]] and the Ratnakūṭa sūtras.<ref name= MarksBrill /> |
|||
===Commentary on Madhyamālaṃkāra=== |
===Commentary on Madhyamālaṃkāra=== |
||
Revision as of 19:56, 16 June 2024
Kamalaśīla | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Personal | |
| Born | c. 740 CE Eastern India |
| Died | c. 795 CE |
| Religion | Buddhism |
| School | Madhyamaka |
| Education | Nalanda |
| Senior posting | |
| Teacher | Śāntarakṣita |
| Part of a series on |
| Buddhism |
|---|
 |
.svg){kind=small}
| Part of a series on |
| Tibetan Buddhism |
|---|
 |
Kamalaśīla (Skt. Kamalaśīla; Tib. པདྨའི་ངང་ཚུལ་, Pemé Ngang Tsul; Wyl. pad+ma'i ngang tshul)[1] (c. 740-795) was an Indian Buddhist of Nalanda Mahavihara who accompanied Śāntarakṣita (725–788)[2] to Tibet at the request of Trisong Detsen. He is considered one of the most important Madhyamaka authors of late Indian Buddhism although little is known about his life aside from details left in Tibetan sources.
Biography
Much of what we know of Kamalaśīla's life comes from later Tibetan sources which are comparitively late and thefore problematic. Tibetan sources refer to him, Santaraksita and Jñānagarbha as rang rgyud shar gsum meaning the “three eastern Svātantrikas” indicating their origins from Eastern India.[3][4] Little else is provided as to his life prior to travelling to Tibet aside from that he studied under Santaraksita in Nalanda and arrived in Tibet at the invitations of King Trisong Detsen after 788 CE after his teachers death.[5]
Debate of Samye
In 793 Trisong Detsen resolved that Moheyan did not hold the true dharma. Following intense protests from Moheyan's supporters, Trisong Detsen proposed to settle the matter by sponsoring a debate, the "Council of Lhasa", although it may actually have taken place at Samye, a considerable distance from Lhasa. Kamalaśila was invited to represent Vajrayana while Moheyan represented the East Mountain Teaching of Chan Buddhism. Most Tibetan sources state that the debate was decided in Kamalaśīla's favour (though many Chinese sources claim Moheyan won)[6] and Moheyan was required to leave the country and that all sudden-enlightenment texts were gathered and destroyed by royal decree. This was a pivotal event in the history of Tibetan Buddhism, which would afterward continue to follow the late Indian model with only minor influence from China.[7] Moheyan's teachings were a mixture of the East Mountain Teachings[note 1] associated with Yuquan Shenxiu and with the teachings of Baotang Wuzhu.[8]
It is said that following his victory, Kamalasila was murdered by three butchers who killed him by squeezing his kidneys.[3]Sources disagree as to whether the killers were assassins hired by Moheyan or non-Buddhists who were against the rise of Buddhism in Tibet.[5]
The Cham dance
There is a Cham dance that retells the story of the Council of Lhasa related to the teachings of Chöd. Moheyan is generally depicted as of ample girth, goaded by children.[9] Chöd is a product of both the Indian and Chinese transmissions of Buddhism into the Himalayas. For a discussion of the Dunhuang fulcrum of the entwined relationship of Chinese and Indian Buddhism see van Schaik and Dalton (2004).[10]
For simplicity, the Vajrayana transmission may be characterised as "gradual" (Wylie: rim gyis 'jug pa; Chinese: dunwu) and the Chan as "direct" (Wylie: cig car gyi 'jug pa; Chinese: jianwu).[11] It needs to be emphasised that this neat dichotomy in characterisation of these two approaches is only valid for the historical context of the great debate between Kamalaśīla and Moheyan and even then it is still open to dialectic.
According to the lore of the orthodox, prevailing Tibetan cultural tradition, Kamalaśīla, a scholar educated at Nalanda, advocated the "gradual" process to enlightenment; whereas, Moheyan, as a trance and meditation master, advocated the "direct" awakening of original mind through the nirodha of discursive thought, the cessation of the mind of ideation. The historicity of this debate has been drawn into question by Tucci & Heissig (1970),[12] Gomez (1983)[13] and Ruegg (1992)[14] though this does not lessen its importance in defining the religious and cultural traditions of Tibet.[15] Kamalaśīla was very handsome and a great orator and historically "won" the debate: though there are conflicting primary sources and secondary accounts.
One hagiography asserts that directly after this debate with Moheyan, as Kamalaśīla was making his way down from the Himalaya to the Indian lowlands, he was incited to enact phowa through compassionate duress, transferring his mindstream to animate a corpse polluted with a dangerous infection and thereby safely moving the hazard it presented to a nearby community. As the mindstream of Kamalaśīla was otherwise engaged, a mahasiddha by the name of Dampa Sangye came across the vacant body of Kamalaśīla. Padampa Sangye was not karmically blessed with an aesthetic corporeal form, and upon finding the very handsome and healthy empty body of Kamalaśīla, which he perceived as a newly-dead fresh corpse, transferred his mindstream into Kamalaśīla's body. Padampa Sangye's mindstream in Kamalaśīla's body continued the ascent to the Himalaya and thereby transmitted the Chöd.
The mindstream of Kamalaśīla, upon endeavouring to return to his body, was unable to do so and resorted by necessity to the vacant body of Padampa Sangye.[16] The mindstream of Padampa Sangye continued in this body, and it is in this handsome body that the transmission of Chöd was made to Machig Labdrön, his consort.[17]
Lineage
Dargyay, et al. (1977, 1998: p. 7) convey a lineage of transmission and translation of Śīla, Sutrayana Buddhavacana and the Six Pāramitā (viewed principally through the Mahayana teachings of Nagarjuna), from India to Tibet (pandit in this context denotes a Sanskrit scholar):
The Indian pandits, represented mainly by Śāntarakṣita, Kamalaśīla, and his disciple Ye-śes-dbang-po, form a known group. These scholars were all defenders of the Madhyamaka school, which is based upon Nāgārjuna's teachings. First of all, however, they taught the ten rules of behaviour of the Buddhist ethics (śīla) and a summary of the teachings according to the canonic Sūtras of the Mahāyāna, as well as the virtuous works of the six pāramitās. These exercises are supposed to lead, in a long seemingly endless way, to the gradual ascent to the acquisition of higher intellectual abilities finally culminating in Buddhahood. This trend was intensified after the debate of bSam-yas had taken place in the years 792 to 794; the exact outcome of this debate is still debatable.[18]
Works
Trilogy of Stages of Meditation (bhāvanākrama)
Kamalaśīla is renowned for writing three texts, all called Bhāvanākrama (Stages of Meditation), which summarize and build upon aspects of the Yogacara tradition of Asanga, particularly as pertaining to aspects of meditation practice and mental cultivation (bhavana).[19] The first volume was translated into Classic Chinese.[20] Though they had different purposes, Kamalaśīla’s three Bhāvanākramas can be regarded as counterparts of Wang Xi’s Dunwu Dasheng zhengli jue reflecting one of the protagonists’ arguments and strategy during the controversy.[5] The Bhāvanākramas can be regarded as one of Kamalaśīla best studied works. All three Bhāvanākramas have been preserved in the Madhyamaka section of the Tengyur and translated into English; the Sanskrit and the Tibetan versions of the first Bhāvanākrama have been edited and translated by Giuseppe Tucci; the Tibetan text of the second Bhāvanākrama has been edited by Goshima in 1983; the third Bhāvanākrama has been translated by Étienne Lamotte.[5]
The three Bhāvanākramas are Kamalaśīla’s most influential works on meditation and there associated practices. All three of the texts overlap with each other and all of them rely on a combination of rational analysis and scriptural citation to establish his understanding of the path of spiritual advancement. Various religious texts are cited in the three Bhāvanākramas including the Sandhinirmocana, Ratnamegha Sutra, Samadhiraja Sutra, Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra and the Ratnakūṭa sūtras.[5]
Commentary on Madhyamālaṃkāra
(Sanskrit: Madhyamālaṃkāra-panjika, Wylie: dbu ma rgyan gyi dka' 'grel)
Commentary on Difficult Points (Sanskrit: Madhyamālaṃkāra-panjika, Wylie: dbu ma rgyan gyi dka' 'grel) by Kamalaśīla
See also
Bibliography
- Kamalaśīla; Kiyotaka Goshima (1983). The Tibetan Text of the Second Bhāvanākrama. Goshima Kiyotaka.
- Kamalaśīla (1997). Bhāvanākramaḥ: Tibetan version, Sanskrit restoration and Hindi translation. Central Inst. of Higher Tibetan studies.
- Kamalaśīla (1997). Bhāvanākrama of Kamalaśila: Transl. Into English by Parmananda Sharma. Aditya Prakashan. ISBN 978-81-86471-15-9.
- Kamalaśīla (1998). The Stages of Meditation: Bhāvanākrama II. Middle volume. Translated by Geshe Lhundup Sopa; Elvin W. Jones; John Newman. Deer Park Books.
- Shūki Yoshimura (1953). Tibetan Buddhistology: Introductory notes: Bhāvanākrama. Research Society for the Eastern Sacred Books, Ryukoku University.
- Kamalaśīla (2007). Kamalashila: The Stages of Meditation, Bhavanakrama II (online text). Dharma Teachings Project.
Notes
- ^ Chinese:
東山 法門 tung-shan fa-men; given the appellation of "Northern School" Chan by Shenhui (670–762)
References
- ^ Shedra, Rigpa. "Kamalashila". Rigpa Wiki. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
- ^ Blumenthal, James (2008). "Śāntarakṣita", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Source: [1] (accessed: 28 February 2009).
- ^ a b Buswell, Robert; Lopez, Donald (2014). The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. pp. 411–412. ISBN 9780691157863.
- ^ Woo, Jeson (2005). "KAMALAŚĪLA ON "YOGIPRATYAKṢA"". Indo-Iranian Journal. 48 (1/2): 111–121. doi:10.1007/s10783-005-8905-6. JSTOR 24664089. S2CID 170809649.
- ^ a b c d e Marks, James. "Kamalaśīla". Brill's Encyclopedia of Buddhism Online.
- ^ Powers 2004, pp. 38–44
- ^ Yamaguchi 1997.
- ^ Hanson-Barber 1985.
- ^ An iconographic thangka depiction of Moheyan is held in the SAMA collection and may be seen here "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 20 July 2008. Retrieved 8 June 2009. (accessed: 14 January 2008)
- ^ van Schaik, Sam and Dalton, Jacob (2004). "Where Chan and Tantra Meet: Buddhist Syncretism in Dunhuang" in Whitfield, Susan (ed) (2004). The Silk Road: Trade, Travel, War and Faith. London: British Library Press. 61–71.
- ^ van Schaik, Sam (2007). The Great Perfection and the Chinese Monk: rNyingmapa defences of Hwashang Mahāyāna in the Eighteenth Century. Source: [2] Archived 29 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine (accessed: 14 January 2007)
- ^ Dargyay, Eva M. (author) & Wayman, Alex (editor) (1977, 1998). The Rise of Esoteric Buddhism in Tibet. Second revised edition, reprint. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt Ltd. Buddhist Tradition Series Vol. 32. ISBN 81-208-1579-3 (paper), p.74, note 21.
- ^ Gomez, Luis O. (1983). "The Direct and Gradual Approaches of Zen Master Mahāyāna: Fragments of the Teachings of Moheyan" in: Gimello, Robert M. and Peter N. Gregory (eds), Studies in Chan and Hua-yen. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press: 393–434.
- ^ Ruegg, D. Seyfort (1992). Buddha-nature, Mind and the Problem of Gradualism in a Comparative Perspective: On the Transmission and Reception of Buddhism in India and Tibet. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
- ^ van Schaik, Sam (2007). The Great Perfection and the Chinese Monk: rNyingmapa defences of Hwashang Mahāyāna in the Eighteenth Century. Source: [3] Archived 29 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine (accessed: 14 January 2007)
- ^ Thrangu, Khenchen & Klonk, Christoph (translator) & Hollmann, Gaby (editor and annotator) (2006). Chod – The Introduction & A Few Practices (accessed: 28 September 2008)
- ^ Source: [4] Archived 30 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine (Thursday, 5 November 2007)
- ^ Dargyay, Eva M. (author) & Wayman, Alex (editor) (1977, 1998). The Rise of Esoteric Buddhism in Tibet. Second revised edition, reprint. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt Ltd. Buddhist Tradition Series Vol. 32. ISBN 81-208-1579-3 (paper), p.7
- ^ Adam, Martin T. (2003). Meditation and the concept of insight in Kamalaśīla's Bhāvanākramas, Montreal: McGill Univ., Dissertation (includes translations)
- ^
廣 釋 菩提心 論 Archived 8 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine
Sources
- Hanson-Barber, A. W. (1985), "'No-Thought' in Pao-T'ang Ch'an and Early Ati-Yoga", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 8 (2): 61–73
- Tucci, G. and Heissig, W. (1970). Die Religionen Tibets und der Mongolei. Stuttgart.
- Yamaguchi, Zuihō (1997), The Core Elements of Indian Buddhism Introduced into Tibet'. In: Jamie Hubbard and Paul L. Swanson (ed.), Pruning the Bodhi Tree: The Storm over Critical Buddhism, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-1949-1
External links
- The Tattvasangraha (with commentary) English translation by Ganganatha Jha, 1937 (includes glossary)
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| People | |
| Other | |
