Template talk:Disused rail start: Difference between revisions
→Disused railways: two pairs is sufficient |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Tag: |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
{{TrainsWikiProject|class=Template|UK=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Trains|UK=yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Convert to using S-rail-templates == |
== Convert to using S-rail-templates == |
||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
(Why is "railways" in the plural? I do realise it is because of {{tl|s-rail}}, not this template, but can anything be done to make it singular?) <span class="nowrap">[[User:Verbarson|-- Verbarson ]] <sup>[[User talk:Verbarson|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Verbarson|edits]]</sub></span> 22:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC) |
(Why is "railways" in the plural? I do realise it is because of {{tl|s-rail}}, not this template, but can anything be done to make it singular?) <span class="nowrap">[[User:Verbarson|-- Verbarson ]] <sup>[[User talk:Verbarson|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Verbarson|edits]]</sub></span> 22:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
:{{replyto|Verbarson}} We have {{tlx|Disused rail start}}/{{tlx|Disused Rail Insert}} for the pre-grouping owner/operator of closed lines, and {{tlx|Historical Rail Start}}/{{tlx|Historical Rail Insert}} to show the pre-grouping owner/operator of lines that are still in use. We don't need more. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] 🌹 ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 22:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
:{{replyto|Verbarson}} We have {{tlx|Disused rail start}}/{{tlx|Disused Rail Insert}} for the pre-grouping owner/operator of closed lines, and {{tlx|Historical Rail Start}}/{{tlx|Historical Rail Insert}} to show the pre-grouping owner/operator of lines that are still in use. We don't need more. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] 🌹 ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 22:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks. I wasn't aware of the Historical... versions. They fit the case. <span class="nowrap">[[User:Verbarson|-- Verbarson ]] <sup>[[User talk:Verbarson|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Verbarson|edits]]</sub></span> 22:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:41, 19 June 2024
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Convert to using S-rail-templates
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could someone please edit the template to use the {{s-rail
templates? See Sandbox-version. Tholme (talk) 19:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Done I checked a dozen semi-random pages that transclude this template, and they all look fine. Ping me from here if you find a situation that is broken by this change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Disused railways
[edit]It is an unwarranted assumption that a disused railway station is on a disused railway. The header of the central section "Disused railways" is incorrect for disused stations on lines that are currently in use. I suggest that it be changed to "Original railways". Relevant examples: Clapham Common, Stewarts Lane railway stations; the companies that built them are long gone, but the lines they stood on are still in use.
(Why is "railways" in the plural? I do realise it is because of {{s-rail}}, not this template, but can anything be done to make it singular?) -- Verbarson talkedits 22:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Verbarson: We have
{{Disused rail start}}
/{{Disused Rail Insert}}
for the pre-grouping owner/operator of closed lines, and{{Historical Rail Start}}
/{{Historical Rail Insert}}
to show the pre-grouping owner/operator of lines that are still in use. We don't need more. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)- Thanks. I wasn't aware of the Historical... versions. They fit the case. -- Verbarson talkedits 22:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)