(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Dogma: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

Dogma: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m →‎See also: I see no reason whatsoever to include 'Aging Brain' under the see also section of this article on dogma.
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{About|established beliefs, doctrines or sets of theological or philosophical tenets|other uses}}
{{About|established beliefs, doctrines or sets of theological or philosophical tenets|other uses}}


'''Dogma''' in the broad sense is any belief held unquestioningly and with undefended certainty. It may be in the form of an official system of [[principle|principles]] or [[doctrine|doctrines]] of a [[religion]], such as [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholicism]], [[Judaism]], or [[Protestantism]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05089a.htm|title=Dogma|website=New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia|access-date=5 October 2016}}</ref> as well as the [[Philosophical theory|positions]] of a philosopher or of a [[Philosophical movement|philosophical school]] such as [[Stoicism]].
'''Dogma''', in its broadest sense, is any belief held unquestioningly and with undefended certainty. It may be in the form of an official system of [[principle]]s or [[doctrine]]s of a [[religion]], such as [[Judaism]], [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholicism]], [[Protestantism]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05089a.htm|title=Dogma|website=New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia|access-date=5 October 2016|archive-date=5 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605133144/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05089a.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> or [[Islam]], as well as the [[Philosophical theory|positions]] of a philosopher or of a [[Philosophical movement|philosophical school]], such as [[Stoicism]].
It may also be found in political belief systems, such as [[communism]], [[progressivism]], [[liberalism]], and [[conservatism]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/22/yes-liberal-democracy-is-struggling-progressive-left-isnt-helping/|title=Yes, liberal democracy is struggling, and the progressive left isn't helping|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=16 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/challenging-the-dogmas-of-right-and-left/540093/|title=Challenging the Dogmas of Right and Left|website=[[The Atlantic]]|access-date=16 January 2021}}</ref>


It may also be found in political belief systems such as [[fascism]], [[socialism]], [[progressivism]], [[liberalism]], and [[conservatism]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/22/yes-liberal-democracy-is-struggling-progressive-left-isnt-helping/|title=Yes, liberal democracy is struggling, and the progressive left isn't helping|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=16 January 2021|archive-date=22 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122085113/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/22/yes-liberal-democracy-is-struggling-progressive-left-isnt-helping/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/challenging-the-dogmas-of-right-and-left/540093/|title=Challenging the Dogmas of Right and Left|website=[[The Atlantic]]|date=18 September 2017 |access-date=16 January 2021|archive-date=17 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210117011431/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/challenging-the-dogmas-of-right-and-left/540093/|url-status=live}}</ref>
In the [[pejorative]] sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities.<ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dogma <nowiki>[1]</nowiki>], "dogma." Merriam-Webster.com | An Encyclopædia Britannica Company, Inc. 1831 | <www.merriam-webster.com/about-us/faq> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dogma>.</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dogma|title=Dogma|website=dictionary.com|access-date=4 October 2016}}</ref> More generally, it is applied to some strong belief which its adherents are not willing to discuss rationally. This attitude is named as a dogmatic one, or as dogmatism, and is often used to refer to matters related to religion, but is not limited to theistic attitudes alone and is often used with respect to political or philosophical dogmas.

In the [[pejorative]] sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dogma|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220729014435/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dogma|archive-date=2022-07-29|title =dogma|work = Merriam-Webster.com |publisher= Encyclopædia Britannica Company, Inc. }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dogma|title=Dogma|website=dictionary.com|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=23 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160923025608/http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dogma|url-status=live}}</ref> More generally, it is applied to some strong belief that its adherents are not willing to discuss rationally. This attitude is named as a dogmatic one, or dogmatism, and is often used to refer to matters related to religion. However, it is not limited to theistic attitudes alone and is often used with respect to political or philosophical dogmas.


==Etymology==
==Etymology==
{{seealso|Enmett}}
{{seealso|Doxa}}
The word ''dogma'' was adopted in the 17th century from {{lang-la|dogma|philosophical tenet or principle}}, derived from the {{lang-grc|[[:wikt:δόγμα|δόγμα]]|[[:wikt:dogma|dogma]]|opinion, belief, judgement}} from the {{lang-grc|[[:wikt:δοκεῖ|δοκεῖ]]|dokeî|it seems that...}}. The plural is based on the {{lang-la|[[:wikt:dogmata|dogmata]]}}, though ''[[:wikt:dogmas|dogmas]]'' may be more commonly used in English.
The word ''dogma'' was adopted in the 17th century from {{lang-la|dogma|philosophical tenet or principle}}, derived from the {{lang-grc|[[:wikt:δόγμα|δόγμα]]|[[:wikt:dogma|dogma]]|opinion, belief, judgement}} from the {{lang-grc|[[:wikt:δοκεῖ|δοκεῖ]]|dokeî|it seems that...}}. The plural is based on the {{lang-la|[[:wikt:dogmata|dogmata]]}}, though ''[[:wikt:dogmas|dogmas]]'' may be more commonly used in English.


Line 18: Line 19:
==In religion==
==In religion==
=== Christianity ===
=== Christianity ===
In Christianity, a ''dogma'' is a belief communicated by divine revelation and defined by the Church,{{sfn|Blackburn|2016|p=139}} The organization's formal religious positions may be taught to new members or simply communicated to those who choose to become members. It is rare for agreement with an organization's formal positions to be a requirement for attendance, though membership may be required for some church activities.<ref name="oxfordreference.com">[http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t98.e978], "dogma" The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Simon Blackburn. Oxford University Press, 2011.</ref>
In Christianity, a ''dogma'' is a belief communicated by divine revelation and defined by the Church,{{sfn|Blackburn|2016|p=139}} The organization's formal religious positions may be taught to new members or simply communicated to those who choose to become members. It is rare for agreement with an organization's formal positions to be a requirement for attendance, though membership may be required for some church activities.{{sfn|Blackburn|2016|p=139}}


In the narrower sense of the church's official interpretation of divine revelation,{{sfn|Stanglin|2009|p=240}} theologians distinguish between defined and non-defined dogmas, the former being those set out by authoritative bodies such as the Roman Curia for the Catholic Church, the latter being those which are universally held but have not been officially defined, the nature of Christ as universal redeemer being an example.{{sfn|O'Collins|1983|pp=162–163}} The term originated in late Greek philosophy legal usage, in which it meant a decree or command, and came to be used in the same sense in early Christian theology.{{sfn|McKim|2001|p=350}} [[Protestantism|Protestants]] to differing degrees are less formal about doctrine, and often rely on denomination-specific beliefs, but seldom refer to these beliefs as dogmata. The first{{cn|date=January 2023}} unofficial institution of dogma in the Christian church was by [[Irenaeus|Saint Irenaeus]] in his ''Demonstration of Apostolic Teaching'', which provides a 'manual of essentials' constituting the 'body of truth'.
In the narrower sense of the church's official interpretation of divine revelation,{{sfn|Stanglin|2009|p=240}} theologians distinguish between defined and non-defined dogmas, the former being those set out by authoritative bodies such as the Roman Curia for the Catholic Church, the latter being those which are universally held but have not been officially defined, the nature of Christ as universal redeemer being an example.{{sfn|O'Collins|1983|pp=162–163}} The term originated in late Greek philosophy legal usage, in which it meant a decree or command, and came to be used in the same sense in early Christian theology.{{sfn|McKim|2001|p=350}} [[Protestantism|Protestants]] to differing degrees are less formal about doctrine, and often rely on denomination-specific beliefs, but seldom refer to these beliefs as dogmata. The first{{cn|date=January 2023}} unofficial institution of dogma in the Christian church was by [[Irenaeus|Saint Irenaeus]] in his ''Demonstration of Apostolic Teaching'', which provides a 'manual of essentials' constituting the 'body of truth'.
Line 24: Line 25:
==== Catholicism and Eastern Christianity ====
==== Catholicism and Eastern Christianity ====
{{main|Dogma in the Catholic Church}}
{{main|Dogma in the Catholic Church}}
For [[Catholic Church|Catholicism]] and [[Eastern Christianity]], the dogmata are contained in the [[Nicene Creed]] and the [[canon law]]s of two, three, seven, or twenty [[ecumenical council]]s (depending on whether one is [[Church of the East]], [[Oriental Orthodoxy|Oriental Orthodox]], [[Eastern Orthodoxy|Eastern Orthodox]], or [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]]). These tenets{{which|date=January 2023}} are summarized by [[John of Damascus]] in his ''Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith'', which is the third book of his main work, titled ''The Fount of Knowledge''. In this book he takes a dual approach in explaining each article of the faith: one, directed at Christians, where he uses quotes from the [[Bible]] and, occasionally, from works of other [[Church Fathers]], and the second, directed both at members of non-Christian religions and at [[atheist]]s, for whom he employs [[term logic|Aristotelian logic]] and [[dialectics]].
For [[Catholic Church|Catholicism]] and [[Eastern Christianity]], the dogmata are contained in the [[Nicene Creed]] and the [[canon law]]s of two, three, seven, or twenty [[ecumenical council]]s (depending on whether one is [[Church of the East]], [[Oriental Orthodoxy|Oriental Orthodox]], [[Eastern Orthodoxy|Eastern Orthodox]], or [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]]). These tenets are summarized by [[John of Damascus]] in his ''Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith'', which is the third book of his main work, titled ''The Fount of Knowledge''. In this book he takes a dual approach in explaining each article of the faith: one, directed at Christians, where he uses quotes from the [[Bible]] and, occasionally, from works of other [[Church Fathers]], and the second, directed both at members of non-Christian religions and at [[atheist]]s, for whom he employs [[term logic|Aristotelian logic]] and [[dialectics]].


The decisions of fourteen later councils that Catholics hold as dogmatic and a small number of decrees promulgated by [[pope]]s exercising [[papal infallibility]] (for examples, see [[Immaculate Conception]] and [[Assumption of Mary]]) are considered as being a part of the Catholic Church's sacred body of doctrine.
The decisions of fourteen later councils that Catholics hold as dogmatic and a small number of decrees promulgated by [[pope]]s exercising [[papal infallibility]] (for examples, see [[Immaculate Conception]] and [[Assumption of Mary]]) are considered as being a part of the Catholic Church's sacred body of doctrine.
Line 30: Line 31:
=== Judaism ===
=== Judaism ===
In the Jewish commentary tradition, ''dogma'' is a principle by which the [[Rabbanim]] can try the proofs of faith about the existence of God and truth; <ref>[[Joseph Albo]], [[Sefer HaIkkarim]]</ref> ''dogma'' is what is necessarily true for rational thinking.<ref>"Fons Vitae" of [[Solomon ibn Gabirol]]</ref> In Jewish [[Kabbalah]], a ''dogma'' is an ''[[archetype]]'' of the [[Pardes (exegesis)|Pardes]] or ''Torah Nistar'', the secrets of Bible. In the relation between "logical thinking" and "rational Kabbalah" the "[[Partzuf]]" is the means to identify "dogma".{{clarify|date=January 2023}}
In the Jewish commentary tradition, ''dogma'' is a principle by which the [[Rabbanim]] can try the proofs of faith about the existence of God and truth; <ref>[[Joseph Albo]], [[Sefer HaIkkarim]]</ref> ''dogma'' is what is necessarily true for rational thinking.<ref>"Fons Vitae" of [[Solomon ibn Gabirol]]</ref> In Jewish [[Kabbalah]], a ''dogma'' is an ''[[archetype]]'' of the [[Pardes (exegesis)|Pardes]] or ''Torah Nistar'', the secrets of Bible. In the relation between "logical thinking" and "rational Kabbalah" the "[[Partzuf]]" is the means to identify "dogma".{{clarify|date=January 2023}}

== Similar concepts==
===Buddhism===
===Buddhism===
{{main|View (Buddhism)}}
{{main|View (Buddhism)}}
[[View (Buddhism)|View]] or position ([[Pali]] ''{{IAST|diṭṭhi}}'', [[Sanskrit]] ''{{IAST|dṛṣṭi}}'') is a central idea in [[Buddhism]] that corresponds with the Western notion of dogma.{{sfn|Fuller|2005|page=1}} In Buddhist thought, a view is not a simple, abstract collection of propositions, but a charged interpretation of experience which intensely shapes and affects thought, sensation, and action.<ref name="Lusthaus 2002">{{cite book|first=Dan|last=Lusthaus|title=Buddhist Phenomenology|url=http://www.khamkoo.com/uploads/9/0/0/4/9004485/buddhist_phenomenology_-_a_pholosophical_investigation_of_yogacara_buddhism_and_the_cheng_wei-shih_lun.pdf|publisher=Routledge|year=2002|page=242, n. 46|access-date=2018-08-27|archive-date=2020-02-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219223250/http://www.khamkoo.com/uploads/9/0/0/4/9004485/buddhist_phenomenology_-_a_pholosophical_investigation_of_yogacara_buddhism_and_the_cheng_wei-shih_lun.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> Having the proper mental attitude toward views is therefore considered an integral part of the Buddhist path, as sometimes correct views need to be put into practice and incorrect views abandoned, while at other times all views are seen as obstacles to enlightenment.{{sfn|Fuller|2005|pages=1–2}}
[[View (Buddhism)|View]] or position ({{lang-sa|दृष्टि|dṛṣṭi|translit-std=IAST}}; {{lang-pi|diṭṭhi|script=Latn|translit-std=IAST}}) is a central idea in [[Buddhism]] that corresponds with the Western notion of dogma.{{sfn|Fuller|2005|page=1}} In Buddhist thought, a view is not a simple, abstract collection of propositions, but a charged interpretation of experience which intensely shapes and affects thought, sensation, and action.<ref name="Lusthaus 2002">{{cite book|first=Dan|last=Lusthaus|title=Buddhist Phenomenology|url=http://www.khamkoo.com/uploads/9/0/0/4/9004485/buddhist_phenomenology_-_a_pholosophical_investigation_of_yogacara_buddhism_and_the_cheng_wei-shih_lun.pdf|publisher=Routledge|year=2002|page=242, n. 46|access-date=2018-08-27|archive-date=2020-02-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219223250/http://www.khamkoo.com/uploads/9/0/0/4/9004485/buddhist_phenomenology_-_a_pholosophical_investigation_of_yogacara_buddhism_and_the_cheng_wei-shih_lun.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> Having the proper mental attitude toward views is therefore considered an integral part of the Buddhist path, as sometimes correct views need to be put into practice and incorrect views abandoned, while at other times all views are seen as obstacles to enlightenment.{{sfn|Fuller|2005|pages=1–2}}

=== Islam ===
{{Main|Taqlid}}
Taqlid ({{lang-ar|تَقْليد|taqlīd}}) is a term in Islam that refers to conforming to the teachings of a particular person. Classical usage of the term differs between [[Sunni Islam]] and [[Shia Islam]]. In Sunni Islam, taqlid refers to the unjustified conformity to the teachings of a person without inquiring or thinking about said teachings, rather than the justified conformity of a layperson to the teaching of ''[[mujtahid]]'' (a person who is qualified for independent reasoning). In Shia Islam, taqlid refers to the general conformity of non-''mujtahid'' to the teaching of ''mujtahid'', without a negative connotation. The discrepancy corresponds to differing views on [[Imamate in Shia doctrine|Shia views on the Imamate]] and [[Sunni imams#Sunni imams|Sunni imams]]. Taqlid can be seen as a form of dogma, as no particular scholar can always be correct, so their rulings should not be taken uncritically.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Imitation (taqleed), following the evidence (daleel) – and was Ibn Hazm a Hanbali? |url=https://islamqa.info/en/answers/23280/imitation-taqleed-following-the-evidence-daleel-and-was-ibn-hazm-a-hanbali |website=islamqa.org |quote="No one has the right to follow an imam blindly and never accept anything but his worlds. Rather what he must do is accept that which is in accordance with the truth, whether it is from his imam or anyone else."}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Aging brain]] - biological basis of cognitive flexibility during human lifespan
* {{annotated link|Axiom}}
* {{annotated link|Axiom}}
* {{annotated link|Central dogma of molecular biology}}
* {{annotated link|Central dogma of molecular biology}}
Line 43: Line 45:
* {{annotated link|Dogmatic theology}}
* {{annotated link|Dogmatic theology}}
* {{annotated link|Escalation of commitment}}
* {{annotated link|Escalation of commitment}}
* [[Faith]] – Confidence or trust, often characterized as without evidence
* {{annotated link|Pseudoskepticism}}
* {{annotated link|Pseudoskepticism}}
* {{annotated link|Standard social science model}}
* {{annotated link|Standard social science model}}
Line 106: Line 109:
{{wikiquote}}
{{wikiquote}}
{{CE1913 poster|Dogma}}
{{CE1913 poster|Dogma}}
* [http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=1378&version=kjv Dogma] – [[James Strong (theologian)|Strong's]] N.T. Greek Lexicon
* [http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=1378&version=kjv Dogma] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070213061957/http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=1378&version=kjv |date=2007-02-13 }} – [[James Strong (theologian)|Strong's]] N.T. Greek Lexicon
* [http://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/aureadomus/convivium/convivium_domani_del_dogma.html Il Domani – terribile o radioso? – del Dogma] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140926002219/http://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/aureadomus/convivium/convivium_domani_del_dogma.html |date=2014-09-26 }}, a book by Enrico Maria Radaelli with a Preface by Roger Scruton and comments by Brunero Gherardini, Alessandro Gnocchi-Mario Palmaro, and Mario Oliveri (Roma 2012)
* [http://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/aureadomus/convivium/convivium_domani_del_dogma.html Il Domani – terribile o radioso? – del Dogma] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140926002219/http://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/aureadomus/convivium/convivium_domani_del_dogma.html |date=2014-09-26 }}, a book by Enrico Maria Radaelli with a Preface by Roger Scruton and comments by Brunero Gherardini, Alessandro Gnocchi-Mario Palmaro, and Mario Oliveri (Roma 2012)
* Irenaeus. ''Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching''. pp.&nbsp;70–75. [online] available at: Christian Classics ethereal library [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/irenaeus/demonstr.i.html St. Irenaeus: Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching – Christian Classics Ethereal Library] [Accessed 20 June 2017]
* Irenaeus. ''Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching''. pp.&nbsp;70–75. [online] available at: Christian Classics ethereal library [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/irenaeus/demonstr.i.html St. Irenaeus: Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching – Christian Classics Ethereal Library] [Accessed 20 June 2017]
Line 114: Line 117:


[[Category:Dogma| ]]
[[Category:Dogma| ]]
[[Category:Dogmatism]]
[[Category:Christian terminology]]
[[Category:Christian terminology]]
[[Category:Epicureanism]]
[[Category:Epicureanism]]

Latest revision as of 01:09, 21 June 2024

Dogma, in its broadest sense, is any belief held unquestioningly and with undefended certainty. It may be in the form of an official system of principles or doctrines of a religion, such as Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestantism,[1] or Islam, as well as the positions of a philosopher or of a philosophical school, such as Stoicism.

It may also be found in political belief systems such as fascism, socialism, progressivism, liberalism, and conservatism.[2][3]

In the pejorative sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities.[4][5] More generally, it is applied to some strong belief that its adherents are not willing to discuss rationally. This attitude is named as a dogmatic one, or dogmatism, and is often used to refer to matters related to religion. However, it is not limited to theistic attitudes alone and is often used with respect to political or philosophical dogmas.

Etymology

[edit]

The word dogma was adopted in the 17th century from Latin: dogma, derived from the Ancient Greek: δόγμα, romanizeddogma, lit.'opinion, belief, judgement' from the Ancient Greek: δでるたοおみくろんκかっぱεいぷしろん, romanizeddokeî, lit.'it seems that...'. The plural is based on the Latin: dogmata, though dogmas may be more commonly used in English.

In philosophy

[edit]

Pyrrhonism

[edit]

In Pyrrhonism, "dogma" refers to assent to a proposition about a non-evident matter.[6] The main principle of Pyrrhonism is expressed by the word acatalepsia, which connotes the ability to withhold assent from doctrines regarding the truth of things in their own nature; against every statement its contradiction may be advanced with equal justification. Consequently, Pyrrhonists withhold assent with regard to non-evident propositions, i.e., dogmas.[7] Pyrrhonists argue that dogmatists, such as the Stoics, Epicureans, and Peripatetics, have failed to demonstrate that their doctrines regarding non-evident matters are true.

In religion

[edit]

Christianity

[edit]

In Christianity, a dogma is a belief communicated by divine revelation and defined by the Church,[8] The organization's formal religious positions may be taught to new members or simply communicated to those who choose to become members. It is rare for agreement with an organization's formal positions to be a requirement for attendance, though membership may be required for some church activities.[8]

In the narrower sense of the church's official interpretation of divine revelation,[9] theologians distinguish between defined and non-defined dogmas, the former being those set out by authoritative bodies such as the Roman Curia for the Catholic Church, the latter being those which are universally held but have not been officially defined, the nature of Christ as universal redeemer being an example.[10] The term originated in late Greek philosophy legal usage, in which it meant a decree or command, and came to be used in the same sense in early Christian theology.[11] Protestants to differing degrees are less formal about doctrine, and often rely on denomination-specific beliefs, but seldom refer to these beliefs as dogmata. The first[citation needed] unofficial institution of dogma in the Christian church was by Saint Irenaeus in his Demonstration of Apostolic Teaching, which provides a 'manual of essentials' constituting the 'body of truth'.

Catholicism and Eastern Christianity

[edit]

For Catholicism and Eastern Christianity, the dogmata are contained in the Nicene Creed and the canon laws of two, three, seven, or twenty ecumenical councils (depending on whether one is Church of the East, Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, or Roman Catholic). These tenets are summarized by John of Damascus in his Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, which is the third book of his main work, titled The Fount of Knowledge. In this book he takes a dual approach in explaining each article of the faith: one, directed at Christians, where he uses quotes from the Bible and, occasionally, from works of other Church Fathers, and the second, directed both at members of non-Christian religions and at atheists, for whom he employs Aristotelian logic and dialectics.

The decisions of fourteen later councils that Catholics hold as dogmatic and a small number of decrees promulgated by popes exercising papal infallibility (for examples, see Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary) are considered as being a part of the Catholic Church's sacred body of doctrine.

Judaism

[edit]

In the Jewish commentary tradition, dogma is a principle by which the Rabbanim can try the proofs of faith about the existence of God and truth; [12] dogma is what is necessarily true for rational thinking.[13] In Jewish Kabbalah, a dogma is an archetype of the Pardes or Torah Nistar, the secrets of Bible. In the relation between "logical thinking" and "rational Kabbalah" the "Partzuf" is the means to identify "dogma".[clarification needed]

Buddhism

[edit]

View or position (Sanskrit: दृष्टि, romanizeddṛṣṭi; Pali: diṭṭhi) is a central idea in Buddhism that corresponds with the Western notion of dogma.[14] In Buddhist thought, a view is not a simple, abstract collection of propositions, but a charged interpretation of experience which intensely shapes and affects thought, sensation, and action.[15] Having the proper mental attitude toward views is therefore considered an integral part of the Buddhist path, as sometimes correct views need to be put into practice and incorrect views abandoned, while at other times all views are seen as obstacles to enlightenment.[16]

Islam

[edit]

Taqlid (Arabic: تَقْليد, romanizedtaqlīd) is a term in Islam that refers to conforming to the teachings of a particular person. Classical usage of the term differs between Sunni Islam and Shia Islam. In Sunni Islam, taqlid refers to the unjustified conformity to the teachings of a person without inquiring or thinking about said teachings, rather than the justified conformity of a layperson to the teaching of mujtahid (a person who is qualified for independent reasoning). In Shia Islam, taqlid refers to the general conformity of non-mujtahid to the teaching of mujtahid, without a negative connotation. The discrepancy corresponds to differing views on Shia views on the Imamate and Sunni imams. Taqlid can be seen as a form of dogma, as no particular scholar can always be correct, so their rulings should not be taken uncritically.[17]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Dogma". New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 5 June 2022. Retrieved 5 October 2016.
  2. ^ "Yes, liberal democracy is struggling, and the progressive left isn't helping". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  3. ^ "Challenging the Dogmas of Right and Left". The Atlantic. 18 September 2017. Archived from the original on 17 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  4. ^ "dogma". Merriam-Webster.com. Encyclopædia Britannica Company, Inc. Archived from the original on 2022-07-29.
  5. ^ "Dogma". dictionary.com. Archived from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  6. ^ Sextus Empiricus, 'Outlines of Pyrrhonism', I. 13.
  7. ^ Sextus Empiricus, 'Outlines of Pyrrhonism', I. 14.
  8. ^ a b Blackburn 2016, p. 139.
  9. ^ Stanglin 2009, p. 240.
  10. ^ O'Collins 1983, pp. 162–163.
  11. ^ McKim 2001, p. 350.
  12. ^ Joseph Albo, Sefer HaIkkarim
  13. ^ "Fons Vitae" of Solomon ibn Gabirol
  14. ^ Fuller 2005, p. 1.
  15. ^ Lusthaus, Dan (2002). Buddhist Phenomenology (PDF). Routledge. p. 242, n. 46. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-02-19. Retrieved 2018-08-27.
  16. ^ Fuller 2005, pp. 1–2.
  17. ^ "Imitation (taqleed), following the evidence (daleel) – and was Ibn Hazm a Hanbali?". islamqa.org. No one has the right to follow an imam blindly and never accept anything but his worlds. Rather what he must do is accept that which is in accordance with the truth, whether it is from his imam or anyone else.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]