User talk:Bosonian

Please read the 3 revert rule, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.--Charles (talk) 23:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

"On the profile of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the tool indicates that a worker on the CIA network reportedly added the exclamation "Wahhhhhh!" before a section on the leader's plans for his presidency." My god this changes everything!

Try to stick to the topic when on the talk page of the Srebrenica article as it isn't a forum. -- ◅PRODUCER _(TALK) 23:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The link was for illustration purposes. Google for "CIA editing Wikipedia" for thousands of articles. In any case, who cares about your opinion, here where everyone is equal. According to the disclaimer that is. No doubt however, you and your other nicks will have a smart comment on everything. Bosonian (talk) 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Srebrenica massacre. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Srebrenica massacre. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ◅PRODUCER _(TALK) 00:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

You first piss off a user and then pretend to advise that user on how detrimental being pissed off is. Wow, I'm so pissed I'm so I'm soooo... fuck off, pig! Now that was quite polite of me you got to admit it. Or was it not good enough for sophisticated ears of an average warmongering Anglo-Serb Freemason who thinks everyone is buying his bullshit? LOL Bosonian (talk) 01:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm a chauvinistic warmongering fascist Anglo-Serb Freemason. You've figured me out. My plot has been foiled! -- ◅PRODUCER _(TALK) 01:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Bingo. Now fuck off and take your stinks with you (hopefully). Bosonian (talk) 01:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Personal attacks

I have removed one of your personal attack here - I see you are attacking others here also, I imagine you are going to be blocked real soon. Off2riorob (talk) 01:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I have reported you to the admin noticeboard here Off2riorob (talk) 02:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for personal attacks and edit warring. Please take this time to reflect on what it is you wish to accomplish on Wikipedia.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Notice of editing restrictions

File:Yellow warning.png

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, "any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict (defined as articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted) if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.

Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision by an uninvolved administrator; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines."

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.