Talk:Martin Heidegger: Difference between revisions
correcting a display issue with the project boxes (which was probably my fault...) |
|||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
What is the difference, and why are they considered separate segments? Is the same or similar logic applied to other parts of this article? |
What is the difference, and why are they considered separate segments? Is the same or similar logic applied to other parts of this article? |
||
[[Special:Contributions/32.221.207.102|32.221.207.102]] ([[User talk:32.221.207.102|talk]]) 20:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/32.221.207.102|32.221.207.102]] ([[User talk:32.221.207.102|talk]]) 20:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
:I agree. These should be integrated. There is a strong case to make for continuing to maintain the Nazi stuff as its own section, but at least some of this material would probably fit better under a unified Biography section. [[User:PatrickJWelsh|Patrick J. Welsh]] ([[User talk:PatrickJWelsh|talk]]) 22:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== The essence of technology == |
== The essence of technology == |
Revision as of 22:02, 21 August 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Martin Heidegger article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 183 days ![]() |
![]() | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | Martin Heidegger was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Philosophy: Philosophers / Aesthetics / Metaphysics / Social and political / Continental / Contemporary C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Christianity: Catholicism C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Religion C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
Poor introduction
The introduction is narrow-scoped and the explication of ideas lacks context -- if you're going to include pithy expositions they need to be sufficiently general that they sit in context with his broader thought, not just one work. As such, it's misleading to readers who might want to acquaint themselves with the thinker. The controversial elements need to be mentioned -- but the breadth of influence of his ideas suggest that his very questionable political activity and failures in his personal life can, at least in part, be evaluated separately from his philosophical output. To make the introduction more representative, his philosophical project and breadth of work needs to be outlined more fully, including mention of his influence on subsequent philosophy. 184.148.136.17 (talk) 02:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
"Biography" and "Personal Life"
What is the difference, and why are they considered separate segments? Is the same or similar logic applied to other parts of this article? 32.221.207.102 (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. These should be integrated. There is a strong case to make for continuing to maintain the Nazi stuff as its own section, but at least some of this material would probably fit better under a unified Biography section. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 22:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The essence of technology
Below I copy a section from the phenomenology page that did not really fit. It's sourced though, and since you don't have coverage here, I thought it might be incorporated. I leave the specifics to those actively involved on the page.
Cheers,
The "essence of technology"
According to Heidegger, the essence of technology is the way of being of modern humans—a way of conducting themselves towards the world—that sees the world as something to be ordered and shaped in line with projects, intentions and desires—a 'will to power' that manifests itself as a 'will to technology'.[1] Heidegger claims that there were other times in human history, a pre-modern time, where humans did not orient themselves towards the world in a technological way—simply as resources for our purposes.[1]
However, according to Heidegger this 'pre-technological' age (or mood) is one where humans' relation with the world and artifacts, their way of being disposed, was poetic and aesthetic rather than technological (enframing).[1] There are many who disagree with Heidegger's account of the modern technological attitude as the 'enframing' of the world.[2] For example, Andrew Feenberg argues that Heidegger's account of modern technology is not borne out in contemporary everyday encounters with technology.[1] Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
overlapping lists of students
There is duplication in the lists of Heidegger's students at Marbug (unsourced) and Freiburg (two sources). If there is a mistake in the first list, it should be corrected; if students followed him, that should be stated explicitly to avoid interpreting the duplication as an error. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- High-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosopher articles
- High-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- C-Class Aesthetics articles
- High-importance Aesthetics articles
- Aesthetics task force articles
- C-Class metaphysics articles
- High-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- High-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Continental philosophy articles
- High-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- High-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- High-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- High-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- High-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles