User talk:Sean William: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sean William (talk | contribs)
unsigned
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
You guys are on 3 reverts im on two. You guys broke the rules go die! {{unsigned|IAmTheCoinMan}}
You guys are on 3 reverts im on two. You guys broke the rules go die! {{unsigned|IAmTheCoinMan}}
:You have done three reverts. If you revert again, you will be blocked for violating the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]]. [[User:PullToOpen|PTO]] 15:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
:You have done three reverts. If you revert again, you will be blocked for violating the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]]. [[User:PullToOpen|PTO]] 15:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

==New Award==

Well Done!!!

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Barnstar_of_Reversion.png|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The IAmTheCoinMan You Are Really Annoying And You Are Good At Anti-Vandalism Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, [[User:IAmTheCoinMan|IAmTheCoinMan]], award you the The IAmTheCoinMan You Are Really Annoying And You Are Good At Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your multiple prompt reverts to my joke. Protecting the wiki isn't important, and an unimportant task under that is protecting other wikipedians! Your efforts are much much not appreciated. I hope someone cuts of your hands!
|}

Revision as of 16:32, 1 April 2007

User talk:Sean William/header.css

Your RfA opening sentence

Your RfA opening sentence made me realise that I used the exact same opening sentence for both my RfA and RfB. Yours was similar to mine... but mine were identical! That's odd. Good luck, by the way :-) --Deskana (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I'm actually laughing pretty hard right now. I changed it at the last minute from "I'm going off the deep end", too... Cheers, PTO 00:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonator

Hello. Thanks for blocking [User:Han Rachel] on Simple English Wikipedia. I browsed through the IP block list and some vandal (possibly a "Kate McAuliffe" vandal) impersonated both me and my sister. I knew that it was not my sister because I checked the contributions of this user and found an edit that no one in my family would do. Amos Han Talk 00:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. We've had a long term vandal there who was obsessed with a girl named "Kate McAuliffe", so the name stuck. PTO 00:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I know who that long term vandal is. He is one of my classmates at my school. He is such a crazy person. I do agree that he is extremely obsessed with Kate McAuliffe. All I hear him say is "Sean McAuliffe has a beautiful sister" and "Wikipedia has a crush on Kate McAuliffe" and things like that. Hopefully he will stop doing that, now that I am extremely tired of hearing that. Amos Han Talk 01:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RCU

You asked me to choose one single code letter in 2 RCU I made [1], [2]. I fulfilled your request, please do the check. Thanks.--MariusM 08:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One has been declined, and the other completed. PTO 20:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers.

- Michael Billington (talk) 10:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hi PullToOpen. I'll never place another inscrutable joke on an RfA again. Sorry. Xiner (talk, email) 15:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I understood it the first time I saw it :). PTO 20:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fool!

3RR Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. PTO 15:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

You guys are on 3 reverts im on two. You guys broke the rules go die! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IAmTheCoinMan (talkcontribs)

You have done three reverts. If you revert again, you will be blocked for violating the three revert rule. PTO 15:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Award

Well Done!!!

The IAmTheCoinMan You Are Really Annoying And You Are Good At Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I, IAmTheCoinMan, award you the The IAmTheCoinMan You Are Really Annoying And You Are Good At Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your multiple prompt reverts to my joke. Protecting the wiki isn't important, and an unimportant task under that is protecting other wikipedians! Your efforts are much much not appreciated. I hope someone cuts of your hands!