(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London Transport: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London Transport: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 55: Line 55:
::"the initial reaction in the enthusiast community has not been positive" not my experience, but experiences differ!
::"the initial reaction in the enthusiast community has not been positive" not my experience, but experiences differ!
::Yes, we should wait until these are implemented before moving anything. [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 09:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
::Yes, we should wait until these are implemented before moving anything. [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 09:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Chessrat|Chessrat]] has proposed moves of the below on the talk on the [[Talk:Watford DC line]]...
:::* [[Watford DC line]] → {{no redirect|Lioness line}}
:::* [[Gospel Oak to Barking line]] → {{no redirect|Suffragette line}}
:::* [[Lea Valley lines]] → {{no redirect|Weaver line}}
:::* [[Romford–Upminster line]] → {{no redirect|Liberty line}}
:::* [[East London line]] → {{no redirect|Windrush line}}
:::* [[North London line]] → {{no redirect|Mildmay line}}
:::[[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 16:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:30, 15 February 2024

Underneath the arches

(Reposted from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways, where there was no response.)

In urban Britain, railway arches are almost ubiquitous. Searching online finds no end of shops in arches, cafes in arches, businesses run in arches, light industry in arches, arches for rent - almost all contemporary.

But railway arches have been around for at least 187 years. A search on WP finds them all over the place, but the information is all scattered. Does any one know of a history, or other deeper analysis, of railway arches? Sadly, this documentary is focussed on the homeless people in the arches, not the architecture - but they are still part of the bigger picture.

So: a book? website? PhD thesis? Photo essay? Radio or TV documentary? Is there anything out there that gives the arches the attention they surely deserve? -- Verbarson  talkedits 16:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reposted to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. -- Verbarson  talkedits 18:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion on the ref desk resulted in Draft:Railway arches in London being started. -- Verbarson  talkedits 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Streetcars#RfC: Notability and Tramlink stops, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New article

I have recently started an article on the Hammersmith Depot. Please feel free to add and expand if you can. Thanks. Elshad (talk) 21:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crossrail site references

Crossrail appear to have redirected all urls on their site e.g. [1] [2] to a Wayback Machine copy of their homepage [3]. This has of course broken a tonne of references. Anyone know an easy way to resolve this? the wub "?!" 11:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a request for a bot to fix the links. See Wikipedia:Link rot/URL change requests#crossrail.co.uk. Thryduulf (talk) 12:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! the wub "?!" 13:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New London Overground lines

The new names for the London Overground lines have been announced. [4] I propose the following to accommodate this.

I deliberately put the Goblin last as it is the one I'm least certain about. Thoughts? MRSC (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:COMMONNAME we should wait a bit before moving anything as it's way to soon to know if these names will catch on (the initial reaction in the enthusiast community has not been positive, but again its too soon to know how representative that is), especially as the branding hasn't even begun to be implemented yet.
As for the Lioness line, I don't think that needs a separate article just a section (at most) about the name and moving the article (if it becomes the common name). We don't have a separate article for the Richmond branch just because it also carries the District line. Thryduulf (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"the initial reaction in the enthusiast community has not been positive" not my experience, but experiences differ!
Yes, we should wait until these are implemented before moving anything. Turini2 (talk) 09:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chessrat has proposed moves of the below on the talk on the Talk:Watford DC line...
Turini2 (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]