(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blanked the page
Tags: Blanking Reverted
m Reverted 2 edits by 24.182.105.152 (talk) to last revision by Guineapigsarecool21
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Wikimedia content balance collaboration}}
{{Seealso|Wikipedia:Systemic bias}}
{{redir|WP:GLOBALIZE|the template|Template:Globalize}}
{{WikiProject status|semi-active|sc=WP:CSB}}
{{Infobox WikiProject
| name = Countering systemic bias
| width =
| image = AS4-1-410HR.jpg
| imagesize = 280px
| caption = An off-center image of Earth captured in [[Apollo 4]] with [[Antarctica]] on top. This is the first ever color image of the Earth in [[medium Earth orbit]].
| shortcuts = [[WP:CSB]]
| category = WikiProject Countering systemic bias
| portal =
| commons =
| parent =
| notice = WikiProject Countering systemic bias
| userbox = User CSB
| has-goals =
| assessment =
}}

The [[WP:ABOUT|Wikipedia]] project contains several types of [[WP:NPOV]] violations that arise from [[systemic bias]] in the demographics of the editor community.<ref name="Hube2017">{{Cite journal |last=Hube |first=Christoph |date=2017-04-03 |title=Bias in Wikipedia |url=https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3053375 |journal=Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion |series=WWW '17 Companion |location=Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE |publisher=International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee |pages=717–721 |doi=10.1145/3041021.3053375 |isbn=978-1-4503-4914-7}}</ref> Encyclopedic coverage is imbalanced and often omits points of view from under-represented demographic groups. [[WP:BIAS|Systemic bias on Wikipedia]] may take the form of [[Gender bias on Wikipedia|gender]], [[Geographical bias on Wikipedia|geographical]], [[Racial bias on Wikipedia|racial]], [[Ideological bias on Wikipedia|ideological]] and other forms of bias.

See [[#Further reading|§&nbsp;Further reading]] for studies, statistics, and more information that demonstrate contributor or subject imbalances.

==Goals==
# Eliminate the gaps caused by the systemic bias in editors' cultural perspective, consciously focusing upon subjects and points of view neglected by the encyclopedia as a whole.
# Improve the editing community's understanding of the systemic bias in Wikipedia by reviewing existing scholarship and ensuring that recent studies about Wikipedia's systemic bias are included as sources in various articles about [[Wikipedia]] itself. Ensure that sections about systemic bias in these articles are clear, complete, and concise.
===Scope===
The first goal is extremely broad, as under-represented POVs may affect almost any article. It may be effective to prioritise [[WP:Featured articles]], [[WP:Good articles]], and [[WP:Vital articles]]. The second goal is limited to articles about Wikipedia itself.

==Systemic bias in coverage and selection of articles==
{{See also|Academic studies about Wikipedia#Bias}}

Research consistently finds [[systemic bias]] in Wikipedia's selection of articles in its various language editions.<ref name="Livingstone2010">{{Cite journal |last=Livingstone |first=Randall M. |date=2010-11-23 |title=Let’s Leave the Bias to the Mainstream Media: A Wikipedia Community Fighting for Information Neutrality |url=https://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/315 |journal=M/C Journal |language=en |volume=13 |issue=6 |doi=10.5204/mcj.315 |issn=1441-2616}}</ref><ref name="Hube2017">{{Cite journal |last=Hube |first=Christoph |date=2017-04-03 |title=Bias in Wikipedia |url=https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3053375 |journal=Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion |series=WWW '17 Companion |location=Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE |publisher=International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee |pages=717–721 |doi=10.1145/3041021.3053375 |isbn=978-1-4503-4914-7}}</ref> This bias leads, without necessarily any conscious intention, to the propagation of various prejudices and omission of important information. Wikipedia's increasing influence on the way people comprehend the world makes this bias a potentially serious threat.

===Selection based on gender bias===
{{main|Gender imbalance on Wikipedia}}
Wikipedia has a longstanding controversy concerning gender bias and sexism.<ref name="nytimes">{{cite news|last=Cassell|first=Justine|title=Editing Wars Behind the Scenes|url=http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/02/where-are-the-women-in-wikipedia/a-culture-of-editing-wars|newspaper=New York Times|date=February 4, 2011}}</ref><ref name="nytimes_a">Noam Cohen, [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1296482628-WKqXsGSoGM9myNIYsHbqYw "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia's Contributor List,"] ''The New York Times''. Found at [[The New York Times]], January 31, 2011.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/29/wikipedia-women-problem/ |title=Wikipedia's Women Problem |publisher=Nybooks.com |date=2013-04-29 |accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref><ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-female-novelists.html Wikipedia's Sexism Toward Women Novelists]</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Dunn |first=Gaby |url=http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-sexism-problem-sue-gardner/ |title=Does Sexism Lurk? |publisher=Dailydot.com |date=2013-05-01 |accessdate=2013-11-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/deannazandt/2013/04/26/yes-wikipedia-is-sexist-thats-why-it-needs-you/ |title=Yes, Wikipedia is Sexist |publisher=Forbes.com |date= |accessdate=2013-11-19 |first=Deanna |last=Zandt}}</ref> Wikipedia has been criticized<ref name="nytimes" /> by some journalists and academics for lacking not only female contributors but also extensive and in-depth encyclopedic attention to many topics regarding gender. An article in ''The New York Times'' cites a Wikimedia Foundation study which found that fewer than 13% of contributors to Wikipedia were women. [[Sue Gardner]], then the executive director of the foundation, said increasing diversity was about making the encyclopedia "as good as it could be". Factors the article cited as possibly discouraging women from editing included the "obsessive fact-loving realm", associations with the "hard-driving hacker crowd", and the necessity to be "open to very difficult, high-conflict people, even [[misogynist]]s".<ref name="nytimes_a" />

===Selection based on racial bias===
{{main|Racial bias on Wikipedia}}
A challenge for editors trying to add Black history articles to Wikipedia is the requirement that potential article topics, such as historical individuals or events, meet Wikipedia's "[[WP:Notability|notability]]" criteria. Sara Boboltz of [[HuffPost]] wrote that the Wikipedia notability criteria "is a troubling problem for those fighting for more content about women and minorities", because "there's simply less [published] documentation on many accomplished women and minorities throughout history – they were often ignored, after all, or forced to make their contributions as someone else's assistant."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Boboltz |first=Sara |date=April 15, 2015 |title=Editors Are Trying To Fix Wikipedia's Gender And Racial Bias Problem |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wikipedia-gender-racial-bias_n_7054550 |access-date=June 16, 2023 |website=[[HuffPost]] |language=en}}</ref>

Maher stated that one issue is that "content on Wikipedia has to be backed up by [[secondary source]]s, sources that she says throughout history have contained a bias toward white men;" "people of color have not been represented in mainstream knowledge creation or inclusion in that knowledge," as "encyclopedias of old were mostly written by European men."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lapowski |first1=Issie |title=Meet the Editors Fighting Racism and Sexism on Wikipedia |url=https://www.wired.com/2015/03/wikipedia-sexism/ |website=[[wired.com]] |access-date=June 16, 2023 |date=March 5, 2015}}</ref>

Although these assume bias, the presence of white nationalists and other far-right extremists on Wikipedia is an ongoing problem that is unlikely to go away in the near future given the rightward political shift in countries where the majority of the site’s users live." The SPLC cited the article [[Race and intelligence]] as an example of the alt-right influence on Wikipedia, stating that at that time the article presented a "[[false balance]]" between fringe racialist views and the "mainstream perspective in psychology."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ward |first1=Justin |title=Wikipedia wars: inside the fight against far-right editors, vandals and sock puppets |url=https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/03/12/wikipedia-wars-inside-fight-against-far-right-editors-vandals-and-sock-puppets |website=[[Southern Poverty Law Center]] |access-date=June 16, 2023 |date=March 12, 2018}}</ref>

== Task forces ==
{{anchor|Countering systemic bias task forces|reason=Original redundant and grammatically confusing section name.}}
Some task forces that focus on particular aspects of systemic bias are linked below:

* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force]]

=== Defunct task forces ===
Talk pages for the following task forces have not been edited in over two years
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Geography]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Global perspective]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/History]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Mathematics]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Politics]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Religion task force]]

==Tasks==
{{multiple image|total_width=400px|perrow=2/2
| image1 = FBE CTU lecture.jpg
| image2 = Schoolgirls in Bamozai.JPG
| image3 = US Navy 100305-N-7676W-182 Cmdr. Jim Grove, from the Office of Naval Research Navy Reserve Program 38, left, helps tudents from McKinley Technology High School make adjustments to their robot.jpg
| image4 = Early Childhood Education USAID Africa.jpg
| footer = This gallery of images from [[Special:Permalink/1130957449|education]] implies that Africans and Asians don't have advanced education system while Westerners do. A way to solve this disparity is to add images of university students in Africa and Asia.
}}
There are many things you may do, listed roughly from least to most intensive:
* Sign up as a [[/members|participant]] and mention any interests you may have related to CSB. Watch the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject countering systemic bias|talk page]], and participate in discussions there.
* Read news articles and other sources from political view points you wouldn't normally read or in other languages. If you're multilingual, translate articles from other languages.
* Consciously edit topics that are systemically under-represented, such as geographic places in Africa. Changing one out of every twenty of your edits to something outside your "comfort zone" would be substantial.
* Create articles for underrepresented groups and topics. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red|Women in Red]] keeps a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Redlist index|list]] of potentially notable women that do not have articles on the English Wikipedia.
* Be careful not to worsen the bias with your deletion nominations. If you are not familiar with a subject area, discuss your concerns on appropriate forums before making an [[WP:AFD|AfD]] nomination.
* Review articles being discussed for deletion. Advocate to keep suitable articles about under-represented topics. Improve articles that are being considered for deletion. For example, use WikiProject delete sorting to review deletion nominations of biographies about women [[WP:DS/WOMEN]]
* Change the demographic of Wikipedia. Encourage friends and acquaintances that you know have interests that are not well-represented on Wikipedia to edit. If you are at high school or university, contact a professor in minority, women's, or critical studies, explain the problem, and ask if they would be willing to encourage students to write for Wikipedia.

==Related WikiProjects and regional noticeboards==
''There are several [[Wikipedia:WikiProjects|WikiProjects]] and [[Wikipedia:Regional notice boards|regional notice boards]] that have potential to help out in our efforts. We may also eventually want to create new WikiProjects as part of this effort.''
* [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|Article Rescue Squadron]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Middle Eastern military history task force|Middle Eastern military history task force]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Authors|WikiProject Authors]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Bible/Biblical criticism work group|WikiProject Biblical Criticism]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography|WikiProject Biography]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism|WikiProject Catholicism]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Disability|WikiProject Disability]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic Groups|WikiProject Ethnic Groups]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies|WikiProject Gender Studies]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Feminism|WikiProject Feminism]]
* [[Wikipedia:Hinduism-related topics notice board|Hinduism-related topics notice board]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam|WikiProject Islam]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Languages|WikiProject Languages]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_LGBT_studies|WikiProject LGBT_studies]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Organized Labour|WikiProject Organized Labour]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government|WikiProject political figures]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history|WikiProject Military history]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts/Global visual art taskforce]] (art from non-Western cultures to balance the strong systemic bias towards the Western canon)
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject World music|WikiProject World music]] (includes tasks to do)
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport]]
::* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women scientists]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's health]]

''See also:''
* [[:Category:WikiProjects relevant for countering systemic bias]]
* {{tl|Infobox WikiProject}}, which has a <code>|csb=yes</code> parameter putting projects in that category

====Africa====
{{Africa-related WikiProjects|notmember=yes}}
{{Africa topic templates}}

====Latin America or the Caribbean====
* [[Wikipedia:Argentina-related regional notice board|Argentina-related regional notice board]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mexican-Americans|WikiProject Mexican-Americans]]
* [[Wikipedia:Caribbean Wikipedians' notice board|Caribbean Wikipedians' notice board]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Echo|WikiProject Echo]], which translates pages from other WikiProjects

{{Latin-America-related WikiProjects|notmember=yes}}
{{Latin America topic templates}}

==== Asia ====
{{Asia-related WikiProjects|notmember=yes}}


Also
* Middle East, under [[:Category:WikiProject Middle East]]
* [[Wikipedia:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics|Notice board for Pakistan-related topics]]
* [[Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics|Notice board for India-related topics]]
* [[Wikipedia:Indonesia-related topics notice board|Indonesia-related topics notice board|topics notice board]]
* [[Wikipedia:Thailand-related topics notice board|Thailand-related topics notice board]]

====Europe====
{{see|Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Geographical/Europe}}
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Basque|WikiProject Basque]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Belarus|WikiProject Belarus]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Bulgaria|WikiProject Bulgaria]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia|WikiProject Croatia]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Estonia|WikiProject Estonia]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Galicia|WikiProject Galicia]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Latvia|WikiProject Latvia]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Moldova|WikiProject Moldova]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Netherlands|WikiProject Netherlands]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ukraine|WikiProject Ukraine]]

==== Other projects ====
* [[meta:Wikimedia urban postering campaign]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Interlanguage Links/Ideas from the Hebrew Wikipedia]] - a project in the Hebrew Wikipedia, and in the first stages of being exported to other languages, to add [[Help:Interlanguage links|interlanguage links]] to articles which don't have them. One of its positive side effects is that it facilitates writing articles about the culture specific to that language.
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Mathematics]]

==Related cleanup templates==

The template {{tl|globalize}} may be placed <!-- on the talk pages of relevant articles --> to produce {{globalize}}

The template {{tl|toofewopinions}} may be placed <!-- in the articles themselves --> to produce {{toofewopinions}}

The template {{tl|religion primary}} may be placed <!-- in the articles themselves --> to produce {{religion primary}}

The template {{tl|recentism}} may be placed <!-- in the articles themselves --> to produce {{recentism}}

When these templates are used they should be accompanied by a brief note on the talk page to outline what exactly you feel needs to be addressed.

==Members==
Please add your name to the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/members|members page]]'''.

We of course encourage all members of WikiProject Countering systemic bias, to also promote their membership to other Wikipedians, by adding the Userbox template to their personal user page. This is fast and easy to do. You only need to add this line at your user page: '''<nowiki>{{User WikiProject Countering systemic bias}}</nowiki>''', and then you will find this wonderful blue userbox displayed:

{{User WikiProject Countering systemic bias}}
{{-}}

If you have specific interests relating to countering systemic bias, feel free to briefly describe them there or on this Wikiproject's talk page so we can get a sense of the strengths of the project.

==References==
{{reflist|30em}}

==See also==
* [[Wikipedia:Systemic bias]]
* [[FUTON bias]]
* [[Wikipedia:Translation]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Global perspective]]
* [[Wikipedia:CSB Collaboration of the Week]] (inactive)
* [[Wikipedia:University of Würzburg survey, 2005]] (old)
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies/Countering Systemic Gender Bias]] (inactive)
* [[Wikipedia:Geographic imbalance]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Research publications/harasssment]]
* [[Wikipedia:Race and ethnicity]]
* [[Self-censorship]]

==Further reading==
* Floating Sheep Collective's report [http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/publications/convoco_geographies_en.pdf "Geographies of the World's Knowledge"] (pdf)<!--Archive: http://www.webcitation.org/6Mf3yfELo --> is available from [http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/vis/ Visualizing Data at the Oxford Internet Institute] and discusses places and time periods which Wikipedia articles tend to focus on or ignore.
* [http://infodisiac.com/blog/2011/05/wikipedia-edits-visualized/ Wikipedia edits visualized] shows the locations of editors worldwide as they edit on the randomly selected day of May 10, 2011.
* [http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777 "Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica"] by Joseph Reagle and Lauren Rhue in the ''International Journal of Communication''
* [http://www.grouplens.org/node/466 "WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia's Gender Imbalance"] a conference paper by Lam, Uduwage, Dong, Sen, Musicant, Terveen, and Riedl. ([[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-08-15/Women and Wikipedia|commentary]] on this from Signpost)
* [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000506.html "Gender Gap: Recapping some basics about what we're doing"] a note by Sue Gardner, the Wikimedia Foundation's executive director
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia’s Contributor List"] by Noam Cohen in The New York Times

==External links==
*[http://www.trust.org/under-reported-stories/ Under Reported Stories] by [[Thomson Reuters Foundation]]
*[http://www.undertoldstories.org Under-Told Stories]
*[http://neglectedbooks.com The Neglected Books Page - www.NeglectedBooks.com: Where forgotten books are remembered]


{{WikiProjectCSBTasks}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Countering systemic bias}}

[[Category:WikiProject Countering systemic bias| ]]

[[eo:Vikipedio:Evitendaj eŭropcentrismoj]]

Revision as of 12:41, 7 March 2024

WikiProject Countering systemic bias
An off-center image of Earth captured in Apollo 4 with Antarctica on top. This is the first ever color image of the Earth in medium Earth orbit.
ShortcutWP:CSB
CategoryWikiProject Countering systemic bias
Project banner template{{WikiProject Countering systemic bias}}
Userbox{{User CSB}}

The Wikipedia project contains several types of WP:NPOV violations that arise from systemic bias in the demographics of the editor community.[1] Encyclopedic coverage is imbalanced and often omits points of view from under-represented demographic groups. Systemic bias on Wikipedia may take the form of gender, geographical, racial, ideological and other forms of bias.

See § Further reading for studies, statistics, and more information that demonstrate contributor or subject imbalances.

Goals

  1. Eliminate the gaps caused by the systemic bias in editors' cultural perspective, consciously focusing upon subjects and points of view neglected by the encyclopedia as a whole.
  2. Improve the editing community's understanding of the systemic bias in Wikipedia by reviewing existing scholarship and ensuring that recent studies about Wikipedia's systemic bias are included as sources in various articles about Wikipedia itself. Ensure that sections about systemic bias in these articles are clear, complete, and concise.

Scope

The first goal is extremely broad, as under-represented POVs may affect almost any article. It may be effective to prioritise WP:Featured articles, WP:Good articles, and WP:Vital articles. The second goal is limited to articles about Wikipedia itself.

Systemic bias in coverage and selection of articles

Research consistently finds systemic bias in Wikipedia's selection of articles in its various language editions.[2][1] This bias leads, without necessarily any conscious intention, to the propagation of various prejudices and omission of important information. Wikipedia's increasing influence on the way people comprehend the world makes this bias a potentially serious threat.

Selection based on gender bias

Wikipedia has a longstanding controversy concerning gender bias and sexism.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Wikipedia has been criticized[3] by some journalists and academics for lacking not only female contributors but also extensive and in-depth encyclopedic attention to many topics regarding gender. An article in The New York Times cites a Wikimedia Foundation study which found that fewer than 13% of contributors to Wikipedia were women. Sue Gardner, then the executive director of the foundation, said increasing diversity was about making the encyclopedia "as good as it could be". Factors the article cited as possibly discouraging women from editing included the "obsessive fact-loving realm", associations with the "hard-driving hacker crowd", and the necessity to be "open to very difficult, high-conflict people, even misogynists".[4]

Selection based on racial bias

A challenge for editors trying to add Black history articles to Wikipedia is the requirement that potential article topics, such as historical individuals or events, meet Wikipedia's "notability" criteria. Sara Boboltz of HuffPost wrote that the Wikipedia notability criteria "is a troubling problem for those fighting for more content about women and minorities", because "there's simply less [published] documentation on many accomplished women and minorities throughout history – they were often ignored, after all, or forced to make their contributions as someone else's assistant."[9]

Maher stated that one issue is that "content on Wikipedia has to be backed up by secondary sources, sources that she says throughout history have contained a bias toward white men;" "people of color have not been represented in mainstream knowledge creation or inclusion in that knowledge," as "encyclopedias of old were mostly written by European men."[10]

Although these assume bias, the presence of white nationalists and other far-right extremists on Wikipedia is an ongoing problem that is unlikely to go away in the near future given the rightward political shift in countries where the majority of the site’s users live." The SPLC cited the article Race and intelligence as an example of the alt-right influence on Wikipedia, stating that at that time the article presented a "false balance" between fringe racialist views and the "mainstream perspective in psychology."[11]

Task forces

Some task forces that focus on particular aspects of systemic bias are linked below:

Defunct task forces

Talk pages for the following task forces have not been edited in over two years

Tasks

This gallery of images from education implies that Africans and Asians don't have advanced education system while Westerners do. A way to solve this disparity is to add images of university students in Africa and Asia.

There are many things you may do, listed roughly from least to most intensive:

  • Sign up as a participant and mention any interests you may have related to CSB. Watch the talk page, and participate in discussions there.
  • Read news articles and other sources from political view points you wouldn't normally read or in other languages. If you're multilingual, translate articles from other languages.
  • Consciously edit topics that are systemically under-represented, such as geographic places in Africa. Changing one out of every twenty of your edits to something outside your "comfort zone" would be substantial.
  • Create articles for underrepresented groups and topics. Women in Red keeps a list of potentially notable women that do not have articles on the English Wikipedia.
  • Be careful not to worsen the bias with your deletion nominations. If you are not familiar with a subject area, discuss your concerns on appropriate forums before making an AfD nomination.
  • Review articles being discussed for deletion. Advocate to keep suitable articles about under-represented topics. Improve articles that are being considered for deletion. For example, use WikiProject delete sorting to review deletion nominations of biographies about women WP:DS/WOMEN
  • Change the demographic of Wikipedia. Encourage friends and acquaintances that you know have interests that are not well-represented on Wikipedia to edit. If you are at high school or university, contact a professor in minority, women's, or critical studies, explain the problem, and ask if they would be willing to encourage students to write for Wikipedia.

Related WikiProjects and regional noticeboards

There are several WikiProjects and regional notice boards that have potential to help out in our efforts. We may also eventually want to create new WikiProjects as part of this effort.

See also:

Africa

Latin America or the Caribbean

Asia


Also

Europe

Other projects

Related cleanup templates

The template {{globalize}} may be placed to produce

The template {{toofewopinions}} may be placed to produce

The template {{religion primary}} may be placed to produce

The template {{recentism}} may be placed to produce

When these templates are used they should be accompanied by a brief note on the talk page to outline what exactly you feel needs to be addressed.

Members

Please add your name to the members page.

We of course encourage all members of WikiProject Countering systemic bias, to also promote their membership to other Wikipedians, by adding the Userbox template to their personal user page. This is fast and easy to do. You only need to add this line at your user page: {{User WikiProject Countering systemic bias}}, and then you will find this wonderful blue userbox displayed:

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Countering systemic bias.

If you have specific interests relating to countering systemic bias, feel free to briefly describe them there or on this Wikiproject's talk page so we can get a sense of the strengths of the project.

References

  1. ^ a b Hube, Christoph (2017-04-03). "Bias in Wikipedia". Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. WWW '17 Companion. Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee: 717–721. doi:10.1145/3041021.3053375. ISBN 978-1-4503-4914-7.
  2. ^ Livingstone, Randall M. (2010-11-23). "Let's Leave the Bias to the Mainstream Media: A Wikipedia Community Fighting for Information Neutrality". M/C Journal. 13 (6). doi:10.5204/mcj.315. ISSN 1441-2616.
  3. ^ a b Cassell, Justine (February 4, 2011). "Editing Wars Behind the Scenes". New York Times.
  4. ^ a b Noam Cohen, "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia's Contributor List," The New York Times. Found at The New York Times, January 31, 2011.
  5. ^ "Wikipedia's Women Problem". Nybooks.com. 2013-04-29. Retrieved 2013-11-19.
  6. ^ Wikipedia's Sexism Toward Women Novelists
  7. ^ Dunn, Gaby (2013-05-01). "Does Sexism Lurk?". Dailydot.com. Retrieved 2013-11-19.
  8. ^ Zandt, Deanna. "Yes, Wikipedia is Sexist". Forbes.com. Retrieved 2013-11-19.
  9. ^ Boboltz, Sara (April 15, 2015). "Editors Are Trying To Fix Wikipedia's Gender And Racial Bias Problem". HuffPost. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  10. ^ Lapowski, Issie (March 5, 2015). "Meet the Editors Fighting Racism and Sexism on Wikipedia". wired.com. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  11. ^ Ward, Justin (March 12, 2018). "Wikipedia wars: inside the fight against far-right editors, vandals and sock puppets". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved June 16, 2023.

See also

Further reading

External links