Talk:Pyraminx: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Samohyl Jan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Actually, it's quite difficult - I found it more difficult than 2x2 Rubik's cube. The reason is that it seems to me you need to go through several non-tetrahedral shapes in order to solve it (ie. primitive operations that start and end as tetrahedron are not enough). [[User:Samohyl Jan|Samohyl Jan]] 05:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
: Actually, it's quite difficult - I found it more difficult than 2x2 Rubik's cube. The reason is that it seems to me you need to go through several non-tetrahedral shapes in order to solve it (ie. primitive operations that start and end as tetrahedron are not enough). [[User:Samohyl Jan|Samohyl Jan]] 05:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
::I created the [[Pyramorphix]] article, which is the puzzle you are describing. [[User:Hellbus|Hellbus]] 02:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:32, 14 April 2007
There is also a variant of tetrahedral Rubik's cube which has only 4 faces on each side, and this variant doesn't seem to be mentioned here on Wikipedia. Samohyl Jan 21:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
It seems to me like that variant would be solved in a maximum of 4 turns by a severely retarded eggplant. Provided that the eggplant had hands.
- Actually, it's quite difficult - I found it more difficult than 2x2 Rubik's cube. The reason is that it seems to me you need to go through several non-tetrahedral shapes in order to solve it (ie. primitive operations that start and end as tetrahedron are not enough). Samohyl Jan 05:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- I created the Pyramorphix article, which is the puzzle you are describing. Hellbus 02:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)