Talk:Pyraminx: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:32, 14 April 2007

There is also a variant of tetrahedral Rubik's cube which has only 4 faces on each side, and this variant doesn't seem to be mentioned here on Wikipedia. Samohyl Jan 21:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me like that variant would be solved in a maximum of 4 turns by a severely retarded eggplant. Provided that the eggplant had hands.

Actually, it's quite difficult - I found it more difficult than 2x2 Rubik's cube. The reason is that it seems to me you need to go through several non-tetrahedral shapes in order to solve it (ie. primitive operations that start and end as tetrahedron are not enough). Samohyl Jan 05:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created the Pyramorphix article, which is the puzzle you are describing. Hellbus 02:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:37, 12 April 2007 edit Samohyl Jan (talk \| contribs) 1,236 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:32, 14 April 2007 edit undo Hellbus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 14,163 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: Actually, it's quite difficult - I found it more difficult than 2x2 Rubik's cube. The reason is that it seems to me you need to go through several non-tetrahedral shapes in order to solve it (ie. primitive operations that start and end as tetrahedron are not enough). [[User:Samohyl Jan\|Samohyl Jan]] 05:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)		: Actually, it's quite difficult - I found it more difficult than 2x2 Rubik's cube. The reason is that it seems to me you need to go through several non-tetrahedral shapes in order to solve it (ie. primitive operations that start and end as tetrahedron are not enough). [[User:Samohyl Jan\|Samohyl Jan]] 05:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

			::I created the [[Pyramorphix]] article, which is the puzzle you are describing. [[User:Hellbus\|Hellbus]] 02:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)