Template talk:Cite wikisource: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Suggestions for expansion and organisation |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
In my opinion, it would be useful to put the original date of publication as a field in the template. As a ''link'' it's not necessary, but as a ''citation'' it's customary and provides some information to the reader about the work being cited. I'm thinking of the single-work case, of course, not the "works by [author]" case. --[[User:Delirium|Delirium]] 09:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC) |
In my opinion, it would be useful to put the original date of publication as a field in the template. As a ''link'' it's not necessary, but as a ''citation'' it's customary and provides some information to the reader about the work being cited. I'm thinking of the single-work case, of course, not the "works by [author]" case. --[[User:Delirium|Delirium]] 09:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Suggestions for expansion and organisation== |
|||
In addition to the above-requested "date" parameter, I'd like to suggest that this template take on more of the features given in {{tl|cite web}}. If this is to be used as a citation template, then this further information is necessary for a reference to be acceptable (think FAC). |
|||
Furthermore, there appears to be some overlap between this template and {{tl|Wikisource-inline}}. Both have their uses, but some delineation is necessary. [[User:52 Pickup|<font color="#1E90FF">'''52 Pickup'''</font >]] [[User_talk:52 Pickup|<font color="purple">(deal)</font>]] 11:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:49, 25 April 2008
Documentation
Usage
| Intent | Usage | Output |
|---|---|---|
| simple link | {{cite wikisource|work title|author}} | author. – via Wikisource. {{citation}}: |author= has generic name (help)
|
| simple author link | {{cite wikisource|author name|type=author}} | (author) – via Wikisource. |
| translingual link | {{cite wikisource|work title|author|fr}} | author. (in French) – via Wikisource. {{citation}}: |author= has generic name (help)
|
date?
In my opinion, it would be useful to put the original date of publication as a field in the template. As a link it's not necessary, but as a citation it's customary and provides some information to the reader about the work being cited. I'm thinking of the single-work case, of course, not the "works by [author]" case. --Delirium 09:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Suggestions for expansion and organisation
In addition to the above-requested "date" parameter, I'd like to suggest that this template take on more of the features given in {{cite web}}. If this is to be used as a citation template, then this further information is necessary for a reference to be acceptable (think FAC).
Furthermore, there appears to be some overlap between this template and {{Wikisource-inline}}. Both have their uses, but some delineation is necessary. 52 Pickup (deal) 11:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)